IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i10p2300-2316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested framings of urban qualities: Dis/qualifications of value in urban development controversies

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Metzger

    (KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden)

  • Sofia Wiberg

    (KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden)

Abstract

What makes a place what it is? What makes it valuable? Questions of this type inevitably relate to practices that articulate urban qualities. This paper investigates the processes and practices through which urban qualities are dis/qualified in urban development processes. Such practices frequently tend to focus on particular urban areas and their development, where some concrete and specific situated value is sensed to be at stake, and therefore often come to play out as struggles over the definition of the supposed ‘essence’ of a particular place, and with this, its qualities and value. The paper brings together the literatures of valuation studies and discussions of framing practices in relation to urban development. Drawing upon these theoretical groundings it conceptualises the dis/qualification of urban qualities as a form of ontological politics which articulates value by way of framing practices. Through the analysis of an empirical case drawn from a Swedish context it is argued that although values and qualities can be negotiated, it is nonetheless always highly uncertain to which degree value-negotiations will hold steady further downstream in the urban development process.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Metzger & Sofia Wiberg, 2018. "Contested framings of urban qualities: Dis/qualifications of value in urban development controversies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(10), pages 2300-2316, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:10:p:2300-2316
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098017712831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017712831
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098017712831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Roscoe & Barbara Townley, 2016. "Unsettling issues: valuing public goods and the production of matters of concern," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 121-126, April.
    2. Martin Kornberger & Lise Justesen & Jan Mouritsen & Anders Koed Madsen, 2015. "Making Things Valuable," Post-Print hal-02298227, HAL.
    3. Jonathan Metzger, 2013. "Placing the Stakes: The Enactment of Territorial Stakeholders in Planning Processes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(4), pages 781-796, April.
    4. William Alonso, 1960. "A Theory Of The Urban Land Market," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 149-157, January.
    5. Robert Hrelja & Karolina Isaksson & Tim Richardson, 2012. "IKEA and Small City Development in Sweden: Planning Myths, Realities, and Unsustainable Mobilities," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 125-145.
    6. Hans Kjellberg & Alexandre Mallard & Diane-Laure Arjaliès & Patrik Aspers & Stefan Beljean & Alexandra Bidet & Alberto Corsin & Emmanuel Didier & Marion Fourcade & Susi Geiger & Klaus Hoeyer & Michèle, 2013. "Valuation studies ? Our collective two cents," Post-Print hal-00827390, HAL.
    7. Martin Kornberger & Lise Justesen & Jan Mouritsen & Anders Koed Madsen, 2015. "Making Things Valuable," Post-Print hal-01892822, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kieron Flanagan & Elvira Uyarra & Iris Wanzenböck, 2021. "Towards a problem-oriented regional industrial policy: possibilities for public intervention in framing, valuation and market creation," Working Papers 52, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Apr 2021.
    2. Hayoun, Shaul, 2019. "How fair value is both market-based and entity-specific: The irreducibility of value constellations to market prices," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 68-82.
    3. Liliana Doganova & Martin Giraudeau & Hans Kjellberg & Claes-Fredrik Helgesson & Francis Lee & Alexandre Mallard & Andrea Mennicken & Fabian Muniesa & Ebba Sjögren & Teun Zuiderent-Jerak, 2018. "Five years! Have we not had enough of valuation studies by now?," Post-Print halshs-01935355, HAL.
    4. Faulconbridge, James R. & Muzio, Daniel, 2021. "Valuation devices and the dynamic legitimacy-performativity nexus: The case of PEP in the English legal profession," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Metz, Ashley & Hartley, Paul, 2020. "Scenario development as valuation: Opportunities for reflexivity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Christopher Wickert & Corinne Post & Jonathan P. Doh & John E. Prescott & Andrea Prencipe, 2021. "Management Research that Makes a Difference: Broadening the Meaning of Impact," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 297-320, March.
    7. Rebecca Vine, 2020. "Riskwork in the construction of Heathrow Terminal 2," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-20, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    8. Kornberger, Martin & Pflueger, Dane & Mouritsen, Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 79-95.
    9. Mennicken, Andrea & Kornberger, Martin, 2021. "Von performativität zu generativität: Bewertung und ihre Folgen im Kontext der Digitalisierung," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110925, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Kornberger Martin & Pflueger Dane & Mouritsen Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures : Accounting for platform organization," Post-Print hal-02276737, HAL.
    11. Neil Pollock & Duncan Chapple & Suwen Chen & Luciana D’Adderrio, 2023. "The Valorising Pitch: How Digital Start‐ups Leverage Intermediary Coverage," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 346-371, March.
    12. Plante, Maude & Free, Clinton & Andon, Paul, 2021. "Making artworks valuable: Categorisation and modes of valuation work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Denis Bulygin & Ilya Musabirov, 2020. "How People Reflect On The Usage Of Cosmetic Virtual Goods: A Structural Topic Modeling Analysis Of R/Dota2 Discussions," HSE Working papers WP BRP 60/MAN/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    14. Mouritsen, Jan & Kreiner, Kristian, 2016. "Accounting, decisions and promises," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 21-31.
    15. Pengyu Zhu, 2013. "Telecommuting, Household Commute and Location Choice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(12), pages 2441-2459, September.
    16. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Mouratidis, Kostas & Ettema, Dick & Næss, Petter, 2019. "Urban form, travel behavior, and travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 306-320.
    18. Karolina Isaksson & Satu Heikkinen, 2018. "Sustainability Transitions at the Frontline. Lock-in and Potential for Change in the Local Planning Arena," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Sangwan Lee & Liming Wang, 2022. "Intermediate Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prices of Housing near Light Rail Transit: A Case Study of the Portland Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Hrelja, Robert, 2019. "Cars. Problematisations, measures and blind spots in local transport and land use policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:10:p:2300-2316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.