IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v45y2008i7p1461-1483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Frontiers and Neo-communitarian Identities in the City: The Case of Santiago de Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Francisca B. Márquez

    (School of Anthropology, Academia de Humanismo Cristiano, University in Santiago, Condell 343, Providencia, Santiago, Chile, fmarquez@academia.cl)

  • Francisca P. Pérez

    (Doctoral Programme of Architecture and Urban Studies at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, fperez@academia.cl)

Abstract

This article analyses the different, yet similar, processes of identity-building used by poor and middle-income inhabitants of Santiago, Chile. It is suggested that these identity-building processes express the current type of urban segregation in this city and point to a weakening of the previously predominant model, which was based on the acceptance of social differences and daily exchanges between these sectors. Additionally, it is contended that the notion of `public space' and values, such as (political) citizenship and social integration, have weakened. Paradoxically, this `new' urban segregation has paved the way for a practice of neo-communitarian lifestyles, which supposedly reinforce the value of `us' and protect this `us' from the danger posed by `them'.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisca B. Márquez & Francisca P. Pérez, 2008. "Spatial Frontiers and Neo-communitarian Identities in the City: The Case of Santiago de Chile," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(7), pages 1461-1483, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:45:y:2008:i:7:p:1461-1483
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098008090684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098008090684
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098008090684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrigo Salcedo & Alvaro Torres, 2004. "Gated Communities in Santiago: Wall or Frontier?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 27-44, March.
    2. Jon Bannister & Nick Fyfe, 2001. "Introduction : Fear and the City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(5-6), pages 807-813, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mike Raco, 2003. "Remaking Place and Securitising Space: Urban Regeneration and the Strategies, Tactics and Practices of Policing in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1869-1887, August.
    2. Yoonseuk Woo & Chris Webster, 2014. "Co-evolution of gated communities and local public goods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(12), pages 2539-2554, September.
    3. Mattheus Brenig & Till Proeger, 2018. "Putting a Price Tag on Security: Subjective Well-Being and Willingness-to-Pay for Crime Reduction in Europe," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 145-166, January.
    4. Manuel Tironi, 2009. "The Lost Community? Public Housing and Social Capital in Santiago de Chile, 1985–2001," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 974-997, December.
    5. Chaitawat Boonjubun, 2019. "Also the Urban Poor Live in Gated Communities: A Bangkok Case Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Ade Kearns & Michael Parkinson, 2001. "The Significance of Neighbourhood," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(12), pages 2103-2110, November.
    7. Nilay Yavuz & Eric W. Welch, 2010. "Addressing Fear of Crime in Public Space: Gender Differences in Reaction to Safety Measures in Train Transit," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(12), pages 2491-2515, November.
    8. Peter Kitchen & Allison Williams, 2010. "Quality of Life and Perceptions of Crime in Saskatoon, Canada," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 33-61, January.
    9. Gavin Shatkin, 2008. "The City and the Bottom Line: Urban Megaprojects and the Privatization of Planning in Southeast Asia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(2), pages 383-401, February.
    10. Chris Webster & Renaud Le Goix, 2005. "Planning By Commonhold," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 19-23, December.
    11. Georgia Alexandri, 2015. "Reading between the lines: Gentrification tendencies and issues of urban fear in the midst of Athens’ crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(9), pages 1631-1646, July.
    12. Adrienne La Grange, 2014. "Hong Kong's Gating Machine," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 251-269, March.
    13. Linda Sandberg & Malin Rönnblom, 2015. "‘I don’t think we’ll ever be finished with this’: Fear and safety in policy and practice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(14), pages 2664-2679, November.
    14. Daskalopoulou, Irene & Karakitsiou, Athanasia & Malliou, Christina, 2022. "Fear of crime and Roma integration," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 344-360.
    15. Wen-Ying Li & Shang-Chia Chiou & Bo-Xun Huang, 2022. "The Sense of Safety and Active Leisure in Gated Enclaves: Evidence from Fuzhou University Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Dennis Rodgers, 2011. "Separate but Equal Democratization?: Participation, Politics, and Urban Segregation in Latin America," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-016, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Charlotte Lemanski, 2006. "Spaces of Exclusivity or Connection? Linkages between a Gated Community and its Poorer Neighbour in a Cape Town Master Plan Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(2), pages 397-420, February.
    18. Ballard, Richard & Jones, Gareth A. & Ngwenya, Makale, 2021. "Trickle-out urbanism: are Johannesburg’s gated estates good for their poor neighbours?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110855, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Michael Janoschka & Jorge Sequera & Luis Salinas, 2014. "Gentrification in Spain and Latin America — a Critical Dialogue," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1234-1265, July.
    20. Rodrigo Mora & Pablo Moran, 2020. "Public Bike Sharing Programs Under the Prism of Urban Planning Officials: The Case of Santiago de Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:45:y:2008:i:7:p:1461-1483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.