IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecaffa/v25y2005i4p19-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning By Commonhold

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Webster
  • Renaud Le Goix

Abstract

So‐called ‘gated’ communities have become common throughout the continents of Asia and America. Such communities are characterised by the ability to provide public goods and perform governance functions, independent of central and local government. It would be surprising if such communities did not develop to a greater extent in Britain, especially as a more complete legal framework now exists for their governance. Examples in Asia and America demonstrate their effectiveness, as do historical examples in the UK, such as the garden city movement. There are outstanding legal and regulatory issues that will need to be addressed as ‘gated’ communities do develop.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Webster & Renaud Le Goix, 2005. "Planning By Commonhold," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 19-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:25:y:2005:i:4:p:19-23
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2005.00584.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2005.00584.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2005.00584.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evan McKenzie, 2003. "Common‐interest housing in the communities of tomorrow," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1-2), pages 203-234.
    2. Rodrigo Salcedo & Alvaro Torres, 2004. "Gated Communities in Santiago: Wall or Frontier?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 27-44, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoonseuk Woo & Chris Webster, 2014. "Co-evolution of gated communities and local public goods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(12), pages 2539-2554, September.
    2. Adrienne La Grange, 2014. "Hong Kong's Gating Machine," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 251-269, March.
    3. Ravit Hananel & Joseph Berechman & Sagit Azary-Viesel, 2022. "Join the Club: Club Goods, Residential Development, and Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Manuel Tironi, 2009. "The Lost Community? Public Housing and Social Capital in Santiago de Chile, 1985–2001," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 974-997, December.
    5. Chaitawat Boonjubun, 2019. "Also the Urban Poor Live in Gated Communities: A Bangkok Case Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Gillad Rosen & Eran Razin, 2009. "The Rise of Gated Communities in Israel: Reflections on Changing Urban Governance in a Neo-liberal Era," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(8), pages 1702-1722, July.
    7. Gavin Shatkin, 2008. "The City and the Bottom Line: Urban Megaprojects and the Privatization of Planning in Southeast Asia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(2), pages 383-401, February.
    8. Zoltán Cséfalvay, 2011. "Searching for Economic Rationale behind Gated Communities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(4), pages 749-764, March.
    9. Dennis Rodgers, 2011. "Separate but Equal Democratization?: Participation, Politics, and Urban Segregation in Latin America," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-016, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Charlotte Lemanski, 2006. "Spaces of Exclusivity or Connection? Linkages between a Gated Community and its Poorer Neighbour in a Cape Town Master Plan Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(2), pages 397-420, February.
    11. Ballard, Richard & Jones, Gareth A. & Ngwenya, Makale, 2021. "Trickle-out urbanism: are Johannesburg’s gated estates good for their poor neighbours?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110855, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Michael Janoschka & Jorge Sequera & Luis Salinas, 2014. "Gentrification in Spain and Latin America — a Critical Dialogue," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1234-1265, July.
    13. Simon C. Y. Chen, 2011. "Common Interest Development and the Changing Roles of Government and Market in Planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(16), pages 3599-3612, December.
    14. Rodrigo Mora & Pablo Moran, 2020. "Public Bike Sharing Programs Under the Prism of Urban Planning Officials: The Case of Santiago de Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Gabriel Fauveaud, 2016. "Residential Enclosure, Power and Relationality: Rethinking Sociopolitical Relations in Southeast Asian Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 849-865, July.
    16. Francisca B. Márquez & Francisca P. Pérez, 2008. "Spatial Frontiers and Neo-communitarian Identities in the City: The Case of Santiago de Chile," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(7), pages 1461-1483, June.
    17. Fernando Calderón-Figueroa, 2024. "Residential Micro-Segregation and Social Capital in Lima, Peru," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Charlotte Lemanski & Sophie Oldfield, 2009. "The Parallel Claims of Gated Communities and Land Invasions in a Southern City: Polarised State Responses," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(3), pages 634-648, March.
    19. Loboda Lichtenbaum, Shira & Rosen, Gillad, 2018. "Municipal management of residential collectively owned open space: Exploring the case of Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 762-771.
    20. Dennis Rodgers, 2011. "Separate but Equal Democratization? Participation, Politics, and Urban Segregation in Latin America," WIDER Working Paper Series 016, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:25:y:2005:i:4:p:19-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-0665 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.