IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v40y2003i9p1869-1887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remaking Place and Securitising Space: Urban Regeneration and the Strategies, Tactics and Practices of Policing in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Raco

    (Department of Geography, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AB, UK, M.Raco@Reading.ac.uk)

Abstract

Urban regeneration programmes in the UK over the past 20 years have increasingly focused on attracting investors, middle-class shoppers and visitors by transforming places and creating new consumption spaces. Ensuring that places are safe and are seen to be safe has taken on greater salience as these flows of income are easily disrupted by changing perceptions of fear and the threat of crime. At the same time, new technologies and policing strategies and tactics have been adopted in a number of regeneration areas which seek to establish control over these new urban spaces. Policing space is increasingly about controlling human actions through design, surveillance technologies and codes of conduct and enforcement. Regeneration agencies and the police now work in partnerships to develop their strategies. At its most extreme, this can lead to the creation of zero-tolerance, or what Smith terms 'revanchist', measures aimed at particular social groups in an effort to sanitise space in the interests of capital accumulation. This paper, drawing on an examination of regeneration practices and processes in one of the UK's fastest-growing urban areas, Reading in Berkshire, assesses policing strategies and tactics in the wake of a major regeneration programme. It documents and discusses the discourses of regeneration that have developed in the town and the ways in which new urban spaces have been secured. It argues that, whilst security concerns have become embedded in institutional discourses and practices, the implementation of security measures has been mediated, in part, by the local socio-political relations in and through which they have been developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Raco, 2003. "Remaking Place and Securitising Space: Urban Regeneration and the Strategies, Tactics and Practices of Policing in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1869-1887, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:9:p:1869-1887
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000106645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098032000106645
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098032000106645?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jon Bannister & Nick Fyfe, 2001. "Introduction : Fear and the City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(5-6), pages 807-813, May.
    2. Andy Merrifield, 2000. "The Dialectics of Dystopia: Disorder and Zero Tolerance in The City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 473-489, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rhodes, Tim & Watts, Louise & Davies, Sarah & Martin, Anthea & Smith, Josie & Clark, David & Craine, Noel & Lyons, Marion, 2007. "Risk, shame and the public injector: A qualitative study of drug injecting in South Wales," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 572-585, August.
    2. Giovanni Santi & Emanuele Leporelli & Michele Di Sivo, 2019. "Improving Sustainability in Architectural Research: Biopsychosocial Requirements in the Design of Urban Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Ola Svenonius, 2018. "The body politics of the urban age: reflections on surveillance and affect," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mattheus Brenig & Till Proeger, 2018. "Putting a Price Tag on Security: Subjective Well-Being and Willingness-to-Pay for Crime Reduction in Europe," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 145-166, January.
    2. Ade Kearns & Michael Parkinson, 2001. "The Significance of Neighbourhood," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(12), pages 2103-2110, November.
    3. Vittorio Magnago Lampugnani, 2004. "Settling in cyber city?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 391-402, December.
    4. Nilay Yavuz & Eric W. Welch, 2010. "Addressing Fear of Crime in Public Space: Gender Differences in Reaction to Safety Measures in Train Transit," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(12), pages 2491-2515, November.
    5. Peter Kitchen & Allison Williams, 2010. "Quality of Life and Perceptions of Crime in Saskatoon, Canada," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 33-61, January.
    6. Georgia Alexandri, 2015. "Reading between the lines: Gentrification tendencies and issues of urban fear in the midst of Athens’ crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(9), pages 1631-1646, July.
    7. Linda Sandberg & Malin Rönnblom, 2015. "‘I don’t think we’ll ever be finished with this’: Fear and safety in policy and practice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(14), pages 2664-2679, November.
    8. Gordon MacLeod & Mike Raco & Kevin Ward, 2003. "Negotiating the Contemporary City: Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1655-1671, August.
    9. Daskalopoulou, Irene & Karakitsiou, Athanasia & Malliou, Christina, 2022. "Fear of crime and Roma integration," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 344-360.
    10. Wen-Ying Li & Shang-Chia Chiou & Bo-Xun Huang, 2022. "The Sense of Safety and Active Leisure in Gated Enclaves: Evidence from Fuzhou University Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Loretta Lees, 2008. "Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2449-2470, November.
    12. Francisca B. Márquez & Francisca P. Pérez, 2008. "Spatial Frontiers and Neo-communitarian Identities in the City: The Case of Santiago de Chile," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(7), pages 1461-1483, June.
    13. Therese Kenna, 2013. "The city: complex, material, imagined and lived," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 695-698, October.
    14. Phil Hubbard, 2004. "Cleansing the Metropolis: Sex Work and the Politics of Zero Tolerance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(9), pages 1687-1702, August.
    15. Alec Brownlow, 2009. "Keeping up Appearances: Profiting from Patriarchy in the Nation's `Safest City'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(8), pages 1680-1701, July.
    16. Jean-Louis Pan Ké Shon, 2012. "Perception of Insecurity in French Poor Neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(3), pages 505-525, February.
    17. Rob Imrie, 2001. "Barriered and Bounded Places and the Spatialities of Disability," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 231-237, February.
    18. Franzini, Luisa & Caughy, Margaret & Spears, William & Eugenia Fernandez Esquer, Maria, 2005. "Neighborhood economic conditions, social processes, and self-rated health in low-income neighborhoods in Texas: A multilevel latent variables model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1135-1150, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:9:p:1869-1887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.