IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v42y2005i8p1411-1427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Search for Community Cohesion: Key Themes and Dominant Concepts of the Public Policy Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • David Robinson

    (Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Howard Street, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK, d.robinson@shu.ac.uk)

Abstract

The community cohesion policy agenda in England emerged from the melee of explanation and advice that abounded in the aftermath of the street disturbances in Bradford, Burnley and Oldham in the summer of 2001. Various reports were published examining issues arising from the disturbances and providing recommendations for action. In 2002, the government responded with the launch of guidance on community cohesion for local authorities and established the Community Cohesion Unit, which was set the twin tasks of reviewing government policy and encouraging new learning and good practice in community cohesion at the local level. Housing was recognised as a key theme within this agenda, having been blamed in the various reports into the disturbances in 2001 for contributing towards high levels of residential segregation in many English towns, which were assumed to lead to different populations living, working and socialising separately. This paper explores this causal story, by first considering the particular conceptualisations of community and multiculturalism informing this new policy agenda, before moving on to question the integrity of four fundamental pillars on which the community cohesion agenda has been built: the assumed self-segregation of South Asian households within certain towns and cities; the role that housing policy and provision have played in reinforcing this process of self-segregation; the potential of housing interventions to reverse this process and to promote residential integration; and the curative benefits that will flow from greater interethnic residential mix.

Suggested Citation

  • David Robinson, 2005. "The Search for Community Cohesion: Key Themes and Dominant Concepts of the Public Policy Agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1411-1427, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:8:p:1411-1427
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980500150755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980500150755
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980500150755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ash Amin, 2002. "Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(6), pages 959-980, June.
    2. Keith R. Ihlanfeldt & Benjamin P. Scafidi, 2002. "The Neighbourhood Contact Hypothesis: Evidence from the Multicity Study of Urban Inequality," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(4), pages 619-641, April.
    3. Michael O. Emerson & Rachel Tolbert Kimbro & George Yancey, 2002. "Contact Theory Extended: The Effects of Prior Racial Contact on Current Social Ties," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 83(3), pages 745-761, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bécares, Laia & Cormack, Donna & Harris, Ricci, 2013. "Ethnic density and area deprivation: Neighbourhood effects on Māori health and racial discrimination in Aotearoa/New Zealand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 76-82.
    2. Katy Bennett & Allan Cochrane & Giles Mohan & Sarah Neal, 2017. "Negotiating the educational spaces of urban multiculture: Skills, competencies and college life," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(10), pages 2305-2321, August.
    3. Francis Leo Collins & Wardlow Friesen, 2011. "Making the Most of Diversity? The Intercultural City Project and a Rescaled Version of Diversity in Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(14), pages 3067-3085, November.
    4. Karien Dekker & Gideon Bolt, 2005. "Social Cohesion in Post-war Estates in the Netherlands: Differences between Socioeconomic and Ethnic Groups," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(13), pages 2447-2470, December.
    5. Maria Budnik & Katrin Grossmann & Christoph Hedtke, 2021. "Migration-Related Conflicts as Drivers of Institutional Change?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 103-112.
    6. van Ours, J.C. & Veenman, J.M.C., 2008. "How Interethnic Marriages Affect the Educational Attainment of Children : Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Other publications TiSEM e9795303-c58f-469e-97b7-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Sonia Stefanizzi & Valeria Verdolini, 2019. "Bordered communities: the perception of insecurity in five European cities," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1165-1186, May.
    8. Anniken Førde, 2019. "Enhancing Urban Encounters: The Transformative Powers of Creative Integration Initiatives," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 44-52.
    9. Stephen L. Ross, 2005. "The Continuing Practice and Impact of Discrimination," Working papers 2005-19, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2006.
    10. Lina Jamoul & Jane Wills, 2008. "Faith in Politics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(10), pages 2035-2056, September.
    11. Renia Ehrenfeucht & Marla Nelson, 2013. "Young Professionals as Ambivalent Change Agents in New Orleans after the 2005 Hurricanes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(4), pages 825-841, March.
    12. Huimin Du & Jing Song & Si-ming Li, 2021. "‘Peasants are peasants’: Prejudice against displaced villagers in newly-built urban neighbourhoods in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1598-1614, June.
    13. Kathy Burrell, 2016. "Lost in the ‘churn’? Locating neighbourliness in a transient neighbourhood," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(8), pages 1599-1616, August.
    14. Gina Netto & Humphrey Abazie, 2013. "Racial Harassment in Social Housing in a Multi-ethnic City: The Case for Moving beyond Acting against Individual Perpetrators of Racial Harassment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(4), pages 674-690, March.
    15. Joanne Sharp & Venda Pollock & Ronan Paddison, 2005. "Just Art for a Just City: Public Art and Social Inclusion in Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 1001-1023, May.
    16. Rikke Skovgaard Nielsen & Anne Hedegaard Winther, 2020. "The complexity of diversity in reality: Perceptions of urban diversity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2817-2832, November.
    17. Junhyoung Kim & Jinmoo Heo & In Lee & Wonseok Suh & Hyangmi Kim, 2015. "The Contribution of Organized Activity to Cultural Sensitivity and Personal and Social Development: A Structural Equation Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 499-513, January.
    18. Großmann, Katrin & Franke, Robert & Henkel, Laura, 2021. "Erfahrungsbericht Segregationsanalysen, Teil 2: Empirische Befunde," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Steinführer, Annett & Porsche, Lars & Sondermann, Martin (ed.), Kompendium Kleinstadtforschung, volume 16, pages 258-274, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    19. Carol Vincent & Sarah Neal & Humera Iqbal, 2017. "Encounters with diversity: Children’s friendships and parental responses," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(8), pages 1974-1989, June.
    20. Andrea Wigfield & Royce Turner, 2013. "The Development of the Good Relations Measurement Framework in Britain: A Template for Experiential Social Measurement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 655-686, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:8:p:1411-1427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.