Two Algorithms for Relaxed Structural Balance Partitioning: Linking Theory, Models, and Data to Understand Social Network Phenomena
AbstractUnderstanding social phenomena with the help of mathematical models requires a coherent combination of theory, models, and data together with using valid data analytic methods. The study of social networks through the use of mathematical models is no exception. The intuitions of structural balance were formalized and led to a pair of remarkable theorems giving the nature of partition structures for balanced signed networks. Algorithms for partitioning signed networks, informed by these formal results, were developed and applied empirically. More recently, “structural balance” was generalized to “relaxed structural balance,” and a modified partitioning algorithm was proposed. Given the critical interplay of theory, models, and data, it is important that methods for the partitioning of signed networks in terms of relaxed structural balance model are appropriate. The authors consider two algorithms for establishing partitions of signed networks in terms of relaxed structural balance. One is an older heuristic relocation algorithm, and the other is a new exact solution procedure. The former can be used both inductively and deductively. When used deductively, this requires some prespecification incorporating substantive insights. The new branch-and-bound algorithm is used inductively and requires no prespecification of an image matrix in terms of ideal blocks. Both procedures are demonstrated using several examples from the literature, and their contributions are discussed. Together, the two algorithms provide a sound foundation for partitioning signed networks and yield optimal partitions. Issues of network size and density are considered in terms of their consequences for algorithm performance.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by in its journal Sociological Methods & Research.
Volume (Year): 40 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 (February)
Contact details of provider:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.