IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v59y2013i2p165-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Depression and the medicalization of sadness: Conceptualization and recommended help-seeking

Author

Listed:
  • Glòria Durà -VilÃ
  • Roland Littlewood
  • Gerard Leavey

Abstract

Background: Critiques of the validity of the DSM diagnostic criteria for depressive disorder argue that it fails to differentiate between abnormal sadness due to internal dysfunction or depression (sadness without an identifiable cause), and normal sadness (sadness with a clear cause). Aims and Methods: A population survey was undertaken in adult education centres in Spain aiming to explore beliefs about depression and normal sadness. Two hypothetical case vignettes portrayed individuals experiencing deep sadness, both fulfilling criteria for major depressive disorder (DSM-IV), one with a clear cause, the other without an identifiable cause. Three hundred and forty-four (344) questionnaires were obtained (95% response rate). Results: Participants statistically significantly differentiated between the sadness- with -cause vignette, seen more frequently as a normal response, while the one without a cause was seen as pathological. Help-seeking behaviour recommendations followed this distinction: a medical option was statistically significantly more common when there was no cause for sadness. Socio-cultural variation in how people understand and deal with sadness was also found. Conclusions: This study emphasizes the importance of taking into account the context in which depressive symptoms occur as it seems that the absence of an appropriate context is what makes people conceptualize them as abnormal. It also raises questions about the lack of face validity of the current diagnostic classification for depressive disorder that exclusively uses descriptive criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Glòria Durà -Vilà & Roland Littlewood & Gerard Leavey, 2013. "Depression and the medicalization of sadness: Conceptualization and recommended help-seeking," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(2), pages 165-175, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:59:y:2013:i:2:p:165-175
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764011430037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764011430037
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764011430037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leavey, Gerard & Loewenthal, Kate & King, Michael, 2007. "Challenges to sanctuary: The clergy as a resource for mental health care in the community," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 548-559, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwan, Chi Kin & Baig, Raees Begum & Lo, Kai Chung, 2018. "Stressors and coping strategies of ethnic minority youth: Youth and mental health practitioners' perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 497-503.
    2. Gert Scheerder & Chantal Van Audenhove & Ella Arensman & Barbara Bernik & Giancarlo Giupponi & Anne-Claire Horel & Margaret Maxwell & Merike Sisask & Andras Szekely & Airi Värnik & Ulrich Hegerl, 2011. "Community and Health Professionals’ Attitude Toward Depression: a Pilot Study in Nine Eaad Countries," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 57(4), pages 387-401, July.
    3. Ryan E Lawrence & Kenneth A Rasinski & John D Yoon & Farr A Curlin, 2014. "Primary care physicians’ and psychiatrists’ willingness to refer to religious mental health providers," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(7), pages 627-636, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:59:y:2013:i:2:p:165-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.