IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v237y2023i5p994-1010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison between computer vision- and deep learning-based models for automated concrete crack detection

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Sales da Cunha
  • Márcio das Chagas Moura
  • Caio Souto Maior
  • Ana Cláudia Negreiros
  • Isis Didier Lins

Abstract

Systems subjected to continuous operation are exposed to different failure mechanisms such as fatigue, corrosion, and temperature-related defects, which makes inspection and monitoring their health paramount to prevent a system suffering from severe damage. However, visual inspection strongly depends on a human being’s experience, and so its accuracy is influenced by the physical and cognitive state of the inspector. Particularly, civil infrastructures need to be periodically inspected. This is costly, time-consuming, labor-intensive, hazardous, and biased. Advances in Computer Vision (CV) techniques provide the means to develop automated, accurate, non-contact, and non-destructive inspection methods. Hence, this paper compares two different approaches to detecting cracks in images automatically. The first is based on a traditional CV technique, using texture analysis and machine learning methods (TA + ML-based), and the second is based on deep learning (DL), using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) models. We analyze both approaches, comparing several ML models and CNN architectures in a real crack database considering six distinct dataset sizes. The results showed that for small-sized datasets, for example, up to 100 images, the DL-based approach achieved a balanced accuracy (BA) of ∼74%, while the TA + ML-based approach obtained a BA > 95%. For larger datasets, the performances of both approaches present comparable results. For images classified as having crack(s), we also evaluate three metrics to measure the severity of a crack based on a segmented version of the original image, as an additional metric to trigger the appropriate maintenance response.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Sales da Cunha & Márcio das Chagas Moura & Caio Souto Maior & Ana Cláudia Negreiros & Isis Didier Lins, 2023. "A comparison between computer vision- and deep learning-based models for automated concrete crack detection," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(5), pages 994-1010, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:5:p:994-1010
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221140966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221140966
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221140966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Volodymyr Mnih & Koray Kavukcuoglu & David Silver & Andrei A. Rusu & Joel Veness & Marc G. Bellemare & Alex Graves & Martin Riedmiller & Andreas K. Fidjeland & Georg Ostrovski & Stig Petersen & Charle, 2015. "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 518(7540), pages 529-533, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tulika Saha & Sriparna Saha & Pushpak Bhattacharyya, 2020. "Towards sentiment aided dialogue policy learning for multi-intent conversations using hierarchical reinforcement learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Mahmoud Mahfouz & Angelos Filos & Cyrine Chtourou & Joshua Lockhart & Samuel Assefa & Manuela Veloso & Danilo Mandic & Tucker Balch, 2019. "On the Importance of Opponent Modeling in Auction Markets," Papers 1911.12816, arXiv.org.
    3. Imen Azzouz & Wiem Fekih Hassen, 2023. "Optimization of Electric Vehicles Charging Scheduling Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Decentralized Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Jacob W. Crandall & Mayada Oudah & Tennom & Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko & Sherief Abdallah & Jean-François Bonnefon & Manuel Cebrian & Azim Shariff & Michael A. Goodrich & Iyad Rahwan, 2018. "Cooperating with machines," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
      • Abdallah, Sherief & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Cebrian, Manuel & Crandall, Jacob W. & Ishowo-Oloko, Fatimah & Oudah, Mayada & Rahwan, Iyad & Shariff, Azim & Tennom,, 2017. "Cooperating with Machines," TSE Working Papers 17-806, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
      • Abdallah, Sherief & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Cebrian, Manuel & Crandall, Jacob W. & Ishowo-Oloko, Fatimah & Oudah, Mayada & Rahwan, Iyad & Shariff, Azim & Tennom,, 2017. "Cooperating with Machines," IAST Working Papers 17-68, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
      • Jacob Crandall & Mayada Oudah & Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko Tennom & Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko & Sherief Abdallah & Jean-François Bonnefon & Manuel Cebrian & Azim Shariff & Michael Goodrich & Iyad Rahwan, 2018. "Cooperating with machines," Post-Print hal-01897802, HAL.
    5. Sun, Alexander Y., 2020. "Optimal carbon storage reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Yassine Chemingui & Adel Gastli & Omar Ellabban, 2020. "Reinforcement Learning-Based School Energy Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Woo Jae Byun & Bumkyu Choi & Seongmin Kim & Joohyun Jo, 2023. "Practical Application of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Optimal Trade Execution," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Lu, Yu & Xiang, Yue & Huang, Yuan & Yu, Bin & Weng, Liguo & Liu, Junyong, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning based optimal scheduling of active distribution system considering distributed generation, energy storage and flexible load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    9. Yuhong Wang & Lei Chen & Hong Zhou & Xu Zhou & Zongsheng Zheng & Qi Zeng & Li Jiang & Liang Lu, 2021. "Flexible Transmission Network Expansion Planning Based on DQN Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Huang, Ruchen & He, Hongwen & Gao, Miaojue, 2023. "Training-efficient and cost-optimal energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric bus based on a novel distributed deep reinforcement learning framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    11. Michelle M. LaMar, 2018. "Markov Decision Process Measurement Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 67-88, March.
    12. Yang, Ting & Zhao, Liyuan & Li, Wei & Zomaya, Albert Y., 2021. "Dynamic energy dispatch strategy for integrated energy system based on improved deep reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    13. Wang, Xuan & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Wang, Rui & Cai, Jinwen, 2020. "Operation performance comparison of CCHP systems with cascade waste heat recovery systems by simulation and operation optimisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    14. Wang, Yi & Qiu, Dawei & Sun, Mingyang & Strbac, Goran & Gao, Zhiwei, 2023. "Secure energy management of multi-energy microgrid: A physical-informed safe reinforcement learning approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    15. Parvez Farazi, Nahid & Zou, Bo & Tulabandhula, Theja, 2022. "Dynamic On-Demand Crowdshipping Using Constrained and Heuristics-Embedded Double Dueling Deep Q-Network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    16. Brammer, Janis & Lutz, Bernhard & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Permutation flow shop scheduling with multiple lines and demand plans using reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 75-86.
    17. Neha Soni & Enakshi Khular Sharma & Narotam Singh & Amita Kapoor, 2019. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Businesses: from Research, Innovation, Market Deployment to Future Shifts in Business Models," Papers 1905.02092, arXiv.org.
    18. Tri-Hai Nguyen & Laihyuk Park, 2023. "HAP-Assisted RSMA-Enabled Vehicular Edge Computing: A DRL-Based Optimization Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Sun, Hongchang & Niu, Yanlei & Li, Chengdong & Zhou, Changgeng & Zhai, Wenwen & Chen, Zhe & Wu, Hao & Niu, Lanqiang, 2022. "Energy consumption optimization of building air conditioning system via combining the parallel temporal convolutional neural network and adaptive opposition-learning chimp algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Zhang, Yang & Yang, Qingyu & Li, Donghe & An, Dou, 2022. "A reinforcement and imitation learning method for pricing strategy of electricity retailer with customers’ flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:5:p:994-1010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.