IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v226y2012i4p380-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A modularized framework for predictive maintenance scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Ming-Yi You
  • Guang Meng

Abstract

This paper presents a modularized, easy-to-implement framework for predictive maintenance scheduling. With a modularization treatment of a maintenance scheduling model, a predictive maintenance scheduling model can be established by integrating components’ real-time, sensory-updated prognostics information with a classical preventive maintenance/condition-based maintenance scheduling model. With the framework, a predictive maintenance scheduling model for multi-component systems is established to illustrate the framework’s use; such a predictive maintenance scheduling model for multi-component systems has not been reported previously in the literature. A numerical example is provided to investigate the individual-orientation and dynamic updating characteristics of the optimal preventive maintenance schedules of the established predictive maintenance scheduling model and to evaluate the performance of these preventive maintenance schedules. It is hoped that the presented framework will facilitate the implementation of predictive maintenance policies in various industrial applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming-Yi You & Guang Meng, 2012. "A modularized framework for predictive maintenance scheduling," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(4), pages 380-391, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:226:y:2012:i:4:p:380-391
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X11431209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X11431209
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X11431209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Makis & X. Jiang, 2003. "Optimal Replacement Under Partial Observations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 382-394, May.
    2. Daming Lin & Ming J. Zuo & Richard C. M. Yam, 2001. "Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models with two categories of failure modes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 172-183, March.
    3. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    4. Barbera, Fran & Schneider, Helmut & Watson, Ed, 1999. "A condition based maintenance model for a two-unit series system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 281-290, July.
    5. Pedregal, Diego J. & Carmen Carnero, Ma, 2006. "State space models for condition monitoring: a case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 171-180.
    6. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    7. Richard Barlow & Larry Hunter, 1960. "Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 90-100, February.
    8. Christer, A. H. & Wang, W. & Sharp, J. M., 1997. "A state space condition monitoring model for furnace erosion prediction and replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Liao, Haitao & Elsayed, Elsayed A. & Chan, Ling-Yau, 2006. "Maintenance of continuously monitored degrading systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 821-835, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Zu-Liang & Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Fang, Chih-Chiang, 2015. "Non-periodic preventive maintenance with reliability thresholds for complex repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 145-156.
    2. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Mao, Weijie, 2009. "A condition-based replacement and spare provisioning policy for deteriorating systems with uncertain deterioration to failure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 184-205, April.
    3. Jingyi Zhao & Chunhai Gao & Tao Tang, 2022. "A Review of Sustainable Maintenance Strategies for Single Component and Multicomponent Equipment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    6. Belyi, Dmitriy & Popova, Elmira & Morton, David P. & Damien, Paul, 2017. "Bayesian failure-rate modeling and preventive maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1085-1093.
    7. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Chen, Mao-Yin & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2013. "Specifying measurement errors for required lifetime estimation performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 631-644.
    8. You, Ming-Yi & Li, Hongguang & Meng, Guang, 2011. "Control-limit preventive maintenance policies for components subject to imperfect preventive maintenance and variable operational conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 590-598.
    9. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    10. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.
    11. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    12. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    13. Zio, Enrico & Compare, Michele, 2013. "Evaluating maintenance policies by quantitative modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 53-65.
    14. Jiawen Hu & Zuhua Jiang & Haitao Liao, 2017. "Preventive maintenance of a batch production system under time-varying operational condition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 5681-5705, October.
    15. Francesco Corman & Sander Kraijema & Milinko Godjevac & Gabriel Lodewijks, 2017. "Optimizing preventive maintenance policy: A data-driven application for a light rail braking system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 534-545, October.
    16. Chien, Yu-Hung & Zhang, Zhe George & Yin, Xiaoling, 2019. "On optimal preventive-maintenance policy for generalized Polya process repairable products under free-repair warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 68-78.
    17. Rui Jiang & Michael Kim & Viliam Makis, 2012. "A Bayesian model and numerical algorithm for CBM availability maximization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 333-348, July.
    18. Van Horenbeek, Adriaan & Buré, Jasmine & Cattrysse, Dirk & Pintelon, Liliane & Vansteenwegen, Pieter, 2013. "Joint maintenance and inventory optimization systems: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 499-508.
    19. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein & Gregory Levitin, 2022. "Replacement Policy for Heterogeneous Items Subject to Gamma Degradation Processes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1323-1340, September.
    20. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha & Amy Langston, 2023. "Termination versus operation extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(6), pages 1175-1185, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:226:y:2012:i:4:p:380-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.