IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v41y2013i2p283-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

After the Corporation

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald F. Davis

Abstract

Shareholder-owned corporations were the central pillars of the US economy in the twentieth century. Due to the success of the shareholder value movement and the widespread “Nikefication†of production, however, public corporations have become less concentrated, less integrated, less interconnected at the top, shorter-lived, and less prevalent since the turn of the twenty-first century, and there is reason to expect that their significance will continue to dwindle. We are left with both pathologies (heightened inequality, lower mobility, and a fragmented social safety net) and new technologies suitable for being repurposed in more democratic forms. Local solutions for producing, distributing, and sharing can provide functional alternatives to corporations for both production and employment; what is needed is the social organization to match the tools that we already have, or will have shortly. The time for democratic local economic forms prophesied by generations of activists may finally be at hand.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald F. Davis, 2013. "After the Corporation," Politics & Society, , vol. 41(2), pages 283-308, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:41:y:2013:i:2:p:283-308
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329213483110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329213483110
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329213483110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shaker A. Zahra & Mike Wright, 2016. "Understanding the Social Role of Entrepreneurship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 610-629, June.
    2. Miguel Antón & Florian Ederer & Mireia Giné & Martin Schmalz, 2023. "Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(5), pages 1294-1355.
    3. Maria L. Goranova & Richard L. Priem & Hermann A. Ndofor & Cheryl A. Trahms, 2017. "Is there a “Dark Side” to Monitoring? Board and Shareholder Monitoring Effects on M&A Performance Extremeness," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 2285-2297, November.
    4. Gino Cattani & Roger L. M. Dunbar & Zur Shapira, 2017. "How Commitment to Craftsmanship Leads to Unique Value: Steinway & Sons’ Differentiation Strategy," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 13-38, March.
    5. Aric Rindfleisch, 2020. "Transaction cost theory: past, present and future," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 85-97, June.
    6. Alex Edmans, 2014. "Blockholders and Corporate Governance," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 23-50, December.
    7. Donald Tomaskovic-Devey & Silvia Maja Melzer, 2020. "The organizational production of earnings inequalities, Germany 1995–2010," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Johan S. G. Chu, 2018. "A Theory of Durable Dominance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 498-512, September.
    9. Myriam Ertz & Fabien Durif & Manon Arcand, 2019. "A conceptual perspective on collaborative consumption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 27-41, June.
    10. Thorgren, Sara & Williams, Trenton Alma, 2023. "Progress without a venture? Individual benefits of post-disruption entrepreneuring," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    11. Rebecca Mitchell & Yun Shen & Lan Snell, 2022. "The future of work: a systematic literature review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2667-2686, June.
    12. Marco Bettiol & Vladi Finotto & Eleonora Di Maria & Stefano Micelli, 2014. "The hidden side of innovation: why tinkerers matter," Working Papers 08, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    13. François Bonnet & Clément Théry, 2014. "Sociology and political science in the patrimonial society: implications of Piketty's Capital," Working Papers halshs-01060570, HAL.
    14. Helfen, Markus & Wirth, Carsten, 2020. "Management von Arbeit in pluralen Netzwerkorganisationen: Trends, Deutungen und Handlungsoptionen," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 185, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    15. Sandra Waddock, 2016. "Developing Humanistic Leadership Education," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 57-73, September.
    16. François-Xavier Dudouet & Eric Grémont & Antoine Vion, 2014. ""Bank Centrality" and Money Creation [« Centralité bancaire » et émission monétaire]," Working Papers halshs-01095256, HAL.
    17. Baines, Joseph & Hager, Sandy Brian, 2021. "The Great Debt Divergence and its Implications for the Covid-19 Crisis: Mapping Corporate Leverage as Power," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar.
    18. Li, Fengchun & Liang, Ting & Zhang, Hailian, 2021. "Does economic policy uncertainty affect cross-border M&As? —— A data analysis based on Chinese multinational enterprises," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    19. Branzei, Oana & Parker, Simon C. & Moroz, Peter W. & Gamble, Edward, 2018. "Going pro-social: Extending the individual-venture nexus to the collective level," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 551-565.
    20. Kam Phung & Sean Buchanan & Madeline Toubiana & Trish Ruebottom & Luciana Turchick‐Hakak, 2021. "When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1107-1139, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:41:y:2013:i:2:p:283-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.