IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v21y1977i2p323-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group Size and Others' Strategy in an N-Person Game

Author

Listed:
  • John Fox

    (Department of Sociology York University)

  • Melvin Guyer

    (Mental Health Research Institute University of Michigan)

Abstract

The effects of group size and cooperativeness of others upon an individual's propensity to cooperate is studied using the Take-Some format of the Prisoner's Dilemma game. By holding utility effects constant, this format permits comparisons to be made between the performances of subjects in different size groups. A 2 × 2 experimental design was employed in which 48 male subjects were assigned to stooge-player groups comprised of either two or eleven “others.†Stooge players in these groups employed either high or low cooperative strategies in 200 repeated trials of play. The results show a significant group-size effect upon the degree of cooperativeness evidenced by the subjects. A significant group size x stooge strategy interaction was also observed, subjects in the 3-person group being responsive to the “others†while subjects in the larger group remained relatively unaffected by “others' †cooperativeness. An interpretation of these results is made in terms of the “accountability†of an individual to others in the group.

Suggested Citation

  • John Fox & Melvin Guyer, 1977. "Group Size and Others' Strategy in an N-Person Game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(2), pages 323-338, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:21:y:1977:i:2:p:323-338
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277702100206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277702100206
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277702100206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Edwin Bixenstine & Clifford A. Levitt & Kellogg V. Wilson, 1966. "Collaboration among six persons in a Prisoner's Dilemma game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 10(4), pages 488-496, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kamei, Kenju, 2020. "Group size effect and over-punishment in the case of third party enforcement of social norms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 395-412.
    2. Jager, W. & Janssen, M. A. & De Vries, H. J. M. & De Greef, J. & Vlek, C. A. J., 2000. "Behaviour in commons dilemmas: Homo economicus and Homo psychologicus in an ecological-economic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 357-379, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeffrey Pincus & V. Edwin Bixenstine, 1977. "Cooperation in the Decomposed Prisoner's Dilemma Game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(3), pages 519-530, September.
    2. Pamela Oliver, 1980. "Selective Incentives in an Apex Game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(1), pages 113-141, March.
    3. Dwight J. Goehring & James P. Kahan, 1976. "The Uniform N-Person Prisoner's Dilemma Game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 20(1), pages 111-128, March.
    4. Phillip Bonacich & Gerald H. Shure & James P. Kahan & Robert J. Meeker, 1976. "Cooperation and Group Size in the N-Person Prisoners' Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 20(4), pages 687-706, December.
    5. Pamela Oliver, 1984. "Rewards and Punishments as Selective Incentives," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 28(1), pages 123-148, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:21:y:1977:i:2:p:323-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.