IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jadint/v25y2021i1p73-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What does the Data Tell Us About Dominatarian Theory of Regional Integration?

Author

Listed:
  • Francis Onditi

Abstract

This article contests that the classical regional integration theoretical frameworks are too broad to bring out conceptual clarity and explain the emerging interstate tensions. The paper identifies two specific indicators that together can explain the dynamics: economic domination and institutional (interest groups) domination. It evaluates the applicability of the Onditi’s dominatarian theory by constructing an alternative thinking framework— regional trade dominance (RTD), to explain the dynamics of the regional integration based on trade data from the East African Community (EAC) Development Strategy, 2016–2021. The paper addresses this conceptual-policy lacuna by demonstrating how Kenya’s economic performance and institutional (interest groups) leverages have sustained its dominant interest, leading to interstate cynicism and mistrust. The persistent mistrust driven by the perceived asymmetric power balance among the EAC Partner States points to the importance of framing the debate in a way that constructs the outcome of the regional integration to accommodate both powerful states and those perceived weak. In this case, the RTD analytical framework, offers the option for constructing the outcome of a regional integration, either as a noun, dominance or as an act of domination .

Suggested Citation

  • Francis Onditi, 2021. "What does the Data Tell Us About Dominatarian Theory of Regional Integration?," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 25(1), pages 73-100, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jadint:v:25:y:2021:i:1:p:73-100
    DOI: 10.1177/09735984211000567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09735984211000567
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09735984211000567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frederick M. Abbott, 2007. "A New Dominant Trade Species Emerges: Is Bilateralism a Threat?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 571-583, September.
    2. Alexander B. Darku, 2009. "The gravity model and the test for the regional integration effect:the case of Tanzania," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 25-44, September.
    3. Busse, Matthias & Shams, Rasul, 2003. "Trade Effects of the East African Community: Do We Need a Transitional Fund?," Discussion Paper Series 26290, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    4. Bizuneh, Menna & Buigut, Steven & Valev, Neven, 2018. "Gaining Global Clout Through Monetary Union: Evidence from East Africa," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 33(2), pages 1363-1387.
    5. Bernard Hoekman & Lemma W Senbet & Witness Simbanegavi, 2017. "Integrating African Markets: The Way Forward," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 26(suppl_2), pages 3-11.
    6. Branko Milanovic, 2006. "Economic Integration and Income Convergence: Not Such a Strong Link?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 88(4), pages 659-670, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Taconet & Aurélie Méjean & Céline Guivarch, 2020. "Influence of climate change impacts and mitigation costs on inequality between countries," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 15-34, May.
    2. Iván Arribas & Francisco Pérez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2014. "The dynamics of international trade integration: 1967–2004," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 19-41, February.
    3. Ilaria Fusacchia & Jean Balié & Luca Salvatici, 2022. "The AfCFTA impact on agricultural and food trade: a value added perspective," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 237-284.
    4. Alfred Moyo, 2019. "Evaluating the impact of global oil prices on the SADC and the potential for increased trade in biofuels and natural gas within the region," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-36, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Walkenhorst, Peter, 2005. "Trade Policy Developments in Tanzania: The Challenge of Global and Regional Integration," MPRA Paper 23399, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Ibrahim A. Adekunle & Abayomi T. Onanuga & Ibrahim A. Odusanya, 2021. "Financial Integration and Growth Outcomes in Africa: Experience of the Trade Blocs," Research Africa Network Working Papers 21/052, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    7. Norehan Abdullah & Hussin Abdullah & Hadi M. Othman Abuhriba, 2014. "The Determinants of Trade and Trade Direction of Arab Maghreb Union (AMU)," Journal of Empirical Economics, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 46-62.
    8. Steven Buigut, 2016. "Trade Effects of the East African Community Customs Union: Hype Versus Reality," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 84(3), pages 422-439, September.
    9. Costantini, Valeria & Liberati, Paolo, 2014. "Technology transfer, institutions and development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 26-48.
    10. Ferreira, Francisco H.G. & Ravallion, Martin, 2008. "Global poverty and inequality : a review of the evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4623, The World Bank.
    11. J. Paul Dunne & Nicholas Masiyandima, 2017. "Bilateral FDI from South Africa and Income Convergence in SADC," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 29(3), pages 403-415, September.
    12. Gallardo-Albarrán, Daniel, 2019. "Missed opportunities? Human welfare in Western Europe and the United States, 1913–1950," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 57-73.
    13. Xuepeng Liu, 2009. "Trade and income convergence: Sorting out the causality," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 169-195.
    14. Maniu Cristina & Marin Pantelescu Andreea, 2013. "Romanian’S Services In The Actual Context Of The Economic Crisis," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 245-254, February.
    15. Menna Bizuneh & Steven Buigut & Neven Valev, 2020. "Beyond Borders: The Euro Crisis and Public Support for Monetary Integration in East Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 88(4), pages 518-535, December.
    16. Kaitibie Simeon & Haq Munshi Masudul & Rakotoarisoa Manitra A., 2017. "Analysis of Food Imports in a Highly Import Dependent Economy," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, August.
    17. Chengang Wang & Yingqi Wei & Xiaming Liu, 2010. "Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows in OECD Countries: Evidence from Gravity Panel Data Models," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7), pages 894-915, July.
    18. Tobias Bünder, 2018. "How Common Is the East African Community’s Common External Tariff Really? The Influence of Interest Groups on the EAC’s Tariff Negotiations," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(1), pages 21582440177, January.
    19. Francis Onditi, 2021. "Dominatarian Theory of Regional Integration," Insight on Africa, , vol. 13(1), pages 76-94, January.
    20. Barnes, Ryan & Bosworth, Ryan, 2015. "LNG is linking regional natural gas markets: Evidence from the gravity model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 11-17.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jadint:v:25:y:2021:i:1:p:73-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.