IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v21y2020i1p197-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study to Measure Job Satisfaction Among Academicians Using Herzberg’s Theory in the Context of Northeast India

Author

Listed:
  • Monu Singh
  • Abhigyan Bhattacharjee

Abstract

The study aims to test the significance of Herzberg’s theory in the field of academics. The study also aims to measure the differences in the satisfaction levels of academicians towards their job on the basis of the location of their home town, that is, from Northeast and other parts of the country. The study is primary in nature and data have been collected with the help of a self-developed questionnaire. The sample units consisted of 478 academicians estimating around 30 per cent of the total academicians working in the central universities of Northeast India. Researchers have used multiple regression analysis, step-wise regression analysis and t -test in the study. It was found from the study that Herzberg’s two-factor theory can be successfully applied to the academics’ job satisfaction. Both the motivation and hygiene factors have been found to be positively and significantly related to job satisfaction. It has been found from the study that there is a significant difference in the satisfaction level of academicians towards the motivation and hygiene factors of job satisfaction due to the difference in their home town. Academicians whose home town is in the Northeast are found to be highly satisfied towards the motivation and hygiene factors than the academicians whose home town is in other parts of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Monu Singh & Abhigyan Bhattacharjee, 2020. "A Study to Measure Job Satisfaction Among Academicians Using Herzberg’s Theory in the Context of Northeast India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(1), pages 197-218, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:21:y:2020:i:1:p:197-218
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150918816413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150918816413
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150918816413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James S. Fairweather, 2005. "Beyond the Rhetoric: Trends in the Relative Value of Teaching and Research in Faculty Salaries," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(4), pages 401-422, July.
    2. James S. Fairweather, 2002. "The Mythologies of Faculty Productivity," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 26-48, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Byunghyun Lee & Changjae Lee & Ilyoung Choi & Jaekyeong Kim, 2022. "Analyzing Determinants of Job Satisfaction Based on Two-Factor Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Binder, Melissa & Chermak, Janie & Krause, Kate & Thacher, Jennifer, 2012. "The teaching penalty in higher education: Evidence from a public research university," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 39-41.
    2. Maria Kravtsova & Aleksey Oshchepkov, 2019. "Market And Network Corruption," HSE Working papers WP BRP 209/EC/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Fouad El Ouardighi & Konstantin Kogan & Radu Vranceanu, 2013. "Publish or Teach ? : Analysis of the Professor's Optimal Career Plan," Working Papers hal-00823514, HAL.
    4. Kristof Witte & Nicky Rogge, 2010. "To publish or not to publish? On the aggregation and drivers of research performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 657-680, December.
    5. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Daniele Biancardi & Mabel Sanchez Barrioluengo & Federico Biagi, 2019. "Study on Higher Education Institutions and Local Development," JRC Research Reports JRC117272, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Ar. R. T. Hidayat & Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Shizuka Hashimoto & Satoshi Hoshino & Muhammad Dimyati & Ahmad E. Yustika, 2023. "Personal Cognition and Implicit Constructs Affecting Preferential Decisions on Farmland Ownership: Multiple Case Studies in Kediri, East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Victor Rudakov & Ilya Prakhov, 2019. "Gender Wage Inequality In Russian Universities," HSE Working papers WP BRP 208/EC/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    8. Akan Kadyrbekov & Dmitry Veselov, 2019. "Migration Of Russian Settlers And The Legacy Of Inter-Regional Development In Kazakhstan," HSE Working papers WP BRP 210/EC/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    9. Charissa Samaniego & Peggy Lindner & Maryam A. Kazmi & Bobbie A. Dirr & Dejun Tony Kong & Evonzia Jeff-Eke & Christiane Spitzmueller, 2023. "Higher research productivity = more pay? Gender pay-for-productivity inequity across disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 1395-1407, February.
    10. Ilya Prakhov & Victor Rudakov, 2018. "The Determinants of Faculty Pay in Russian Universities: Incentive Contracts," HSE Working papers WP BRP 47/EDU/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. Jung Cheol Shin & William K. Cummings, 2010. "Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: research preference, collaboration, and time on research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(2), pages 581-594, November.
    12. Mary Feeney & Eric Welch, 2014. "Academic outcomes among principal investigators, co-principal investigators, and non-PI researchers," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 111-133, February.
    13. Kyle R. Myers & Wei Yang Tham & Jerry Thursby & Marie Thursby & Nina Cohodes & Karim Lakhani & Rachel Mural & Yilun Xu, 2023. "New Facts and Data about Professors and their Research," Papers 2312.01442, arXiv.org.
    14. repec:hal:journl:hal-00823514 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. J. Corey Miller & Keith H. Coble & Jayson L. Lusk, 2013. "Evaluating top faculty researchers and the incentives that motivate them," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(3), pages 519-533, December.
    16. Mark D Lindner & Richard K Nakamura, 2015. "Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Karla Damiano-Teixeira, 2006. "Managing Conflicting Roles: A Qualitative Study with Female Faculty Members," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 310-334, June.
    18. Seyedali Ahrari & Jamilah Bt. Othman & Md. Salleh Hassan & Bahaman Abu Samah & Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh, 2017. "Using Network-Based Theory to Develop a Curriculum for Citizenship Education in Higher Institutions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 1207-1228, February.
    19. Hui Li & Shoukat Iqbal Khattak & Qingquan Jiang, 2021. "A Qualitative Assessment of the Determinants of Faculty Engagement in Internationalization: A Chinese Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    20. Meredith, Jack R. & Steward, Michelle D. & Lewis, Bruce R., 2011. "Knowledge dissemination in operations management: Published perceptions versus academic reality," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 435-446, August.
    21. Eugene Judson & Lydia Ross & Kristi Glassmeyer, 2019. "How Research, Teaching, and Leadership Roles are Recommended to Male and Female Engineering Faculty Differently," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(7), pages 1025-1047, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:21:y:2020:i:1:p:197-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.