IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v14y2013i1p137-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Consumers’ Preferences and Attitudes Towards Branded Petrol: An Initial Investigation of the Branded Petrol Market

Author

Listed:
  • Anurag Dugar

Abstract

Petrol was sold as a ‘commodity’ through ‘mass marketing’ in India for over four decades and generations of Indian consumers got so used to this that when ‘segmented marketing’ arrived and brands were launched in 2002, a paradigm shift was expected in marketing practices and also in consumer behaviour. The changes occurred, as expected. Before 2002, Indian consumers purchased petrol which came in only one variant, from government regulated companies with similar sounding names and logos, at one price from one type of outlet. Even the promotion campaigns reached consumers through identical media (hoardings) and conveyed identical messages (‘save petrol’). This was the result of tight regulations posed by the government on the marketing of petrol. Also, offering subsidies to petroleum marketing companies and setting different prices of petrol and diesel were also a part of government’s overall strategy. Over a period of time, the sharp rise in demand made the government realize that it could not manage the exploration, refining and marketing of petrol on its own. After a lot of deliberation, in 2002, government allowed private sector players to market petrol, with a promise of providing a level playing field to them. As a result, the Indian market saw the entry of multinational (Royal Dutch Shell Plc.) and private Indian players (Reliance Industries, Essar Oil Limited, etc.) setting up shop to market petrol. Brands were launched, celebrities were hired to promote the brands, outlets were refurbished and pricing was revisited and different variants of petrol were offered at different prices. The whole scenario changed very quickly and companies went out all guns blazing and all the players launched a marketing blitzkrieg. Objective of the study: Now, after a decade of high-decibel marketing action and after millions having been spent in brand building and educating consumers about the new avatars of petrol and ways of petroleum marketing, it was felt that it would be interesting and useful to take stock of the outcome of these marketing activities. To be precise, this research is aimed at measuring the changes, if any, in consumers’ preferences and attitudes towards branded petrol. Methodology : To achieve the above, an empirical study was undertaken and data was collected from 900 MBA students who drive their own vehicles and hence are consumers of petrol. Hence, it was a fairly large homogenous set of respondents to whom the questionnaire was administered. Findings : The results of the study present interesting findings for academicians as well as marketers. It was found that although consumers see value in branded petrol they consider different brands of petrol as ‘very similar’. It may be concluded that the marketing strategies have made the consumers sit up and take notice of petrol brands and also the strategies have been successful in the sense that consumers see value in branded petrol. Another interesting insight as a result of analysis was that consumers perceive that they are price sensitive as far as petrol is concerned, but actually they are not. Implications : The above suggests that companies would have to think of creative ways to position their brands as ‘different’ because until that is achieved, the companies will not be able to reap the real benefits of marketing and marketers of petrol need not lose their sleep on the price sensitivity of the consumers (at least up to an extent); rather, they should focus on adding value and creating meaningful differentiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Anurag Dugar, 2013. "Measuring Consumers’ Preferences and Attitudes Towards Branded Petrol: An Initial Investigation of the Branded Petrol Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(1), pages 137-154, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:14:y:2013:i:1:p:137-154
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150912466466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150912466466
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150912466466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maheswaran, Durairaj & Sternthal, Brian, 1990. "The Effects of Knowledge, Motivation, and Type of Message on Ad Processing and Product Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(1), pages 66-73, June.
    2. Ambarish Chandra & Mariano Tappata, 2011. "Consumer search and dynamic price dispersion: an application to gasoline markets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 42(4), pages 681-704, December.
    3. Lichtenstein, Donald R & Bloch, Peter H & Black, William C, 1988. "Correlates of Price Acceptability," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 243-252, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mitra, Anusree, 1995. "Price cue utilization in product evaluations : The moderating role of motivation and attribute information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 187-195, July.
    2. Satoh, Eiji & Iwase, Ryusuke & Kamakura, Keita & Sawasato, Shinji & Tominaga, Saki, 2018. "Consumer search costs, geographical concentration, and retail gasoline pricing: Evidence from inland Japan," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-8.
    3. Wein, Thomas, 2021. "Why abandoning the paradise? Stations incentives to reduce gasoline prices at first," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242362, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Montag, Felix & Mamrak, Robin & Sagimuldina, Alina & Schnitzer, Monika, 2023. "Imperfect price information, market power, and tax pass-through," Working Papers 337, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    5. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2017. "Geographical dispersion of consumer search behaviour," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(57), pages 5740-5752, December.
    6. Lucas W. Davis, Shaun Mcrae, and Enrique Seira Bejarano, 2019. "An Economic Perspective on Mexico's Nascent Deregulation of Retail Petroleum Markets," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    7. Andreas Leibbrandt, 2016. "Behavioral Constraints on Pricing: Experimental Evidence on Price Discrimination and Customer Antagonism," CESifo Working Paper Series 6214, CESifo.
    8. Saul Lach & José L. Moraga†González, 2017. "Asymmetric Price Effects of Competition," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(4), pages 767-803, December.
    9. Kukar-Kinney, Monika & Ridgway, Nancy M. & Monroe, Kent B., 2012. "The Role of Price in the Behavior and Purchase Decisions of Compulsive Buyers," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 63-71.
    10. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Intini, Mario & Perdiguero, Jordi, 2020. "Pay cycles and fuel price: a quasi experimental approach," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1288, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    11. Joshua Sherman & Avi Weiss, 2017. "On Fruitful And Futile Tests Of The Relationship Between Search And Price Dispersion," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(4), pages 1898-1918, October.
    12. Drevs, Florian & Tscheulin, Dieter K. & Lindenmeier, Jörg & Renner, Simone, 2014. "Crowding-in or crowding out: An empirical analysis on the effect of subsidies on individual willingness-to-pay for public transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 250-261.
    13. Yilmazkuday Hakan, 2017. "Anti-Crime Laws and Retail Prices," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Balabanis, George & Stathopoulou, Anastasia, 2021. "The price of social status desire and public self-consciousness in luxury consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 463-475.
    15. David P. Byrne & Nicolas de Roos, 2017. "Consumer Search in Retail Gasoline Markets," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(1), pages 183-193, March.
    16. Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Kerr Lorenzo Picazo & Kim Aaron Salvador & Bobby Ardiansyah Miraja & Yoshiki B. Kurata & Thanatorn Chuenyindee & Reny Nadlifatin & Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira , 2021. "Gym-Goers Preference Analysis of Fitness Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach for Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Rabbanee, Fazlul K. & Roy, Rajat & Sharma, Piyush, 2022. "Contextual differences in the moderating effects of price consciousness and social desirability in pay-what-you-want (PWYW) pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 13-25.
    18. Lindblom, Arto & Lindblom, Taru & Wechtler, Heidi, 2018. "Collaborative consumption as C2C trading: Analyzing the effects of materialism and price consciousness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 244-252.
    19. Kapoor, Ankur & Sahay, Arvind & Singh, Nandini C. & Chandrasekhar Pammi, V.S. & Banerjee, Prantosh, 2023. "The neural correlates and the underlying processes of weak brand choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    20. Stühmeier Torben, 2015. "Price Disclosure Rules and Consumer Price Comparison," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 815-835, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:14:y:2013:i:1:p:137-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.