IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v18y1994i4p458-471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teacher Involvement in School-Conducted Needs Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Paul R. Brandon

    (University of Hawaii at Manoa)

  • Zhigang Wang

    (University of Hawaii at Manoa)

  • Ronald H. Heck

    (University of Hawaii at Manoa)

Abstract

Little attention in the literature on stakeholder shared decision making in program evaluations has been given to involving stakeholders in developing the process of decision making. If stakeholders are not fully involved in developing this process, decisions may be biased and lead to invalid evaluation findings. In this article, the authors present a theoretical model suggesting how stakeholder involvement in establishing the process of decision making in school-conducted needs assessments affects the validity of the selected needs, with validity defined as teacher agreement with the selection of needs. Using LISREL VII, the model was tested using teacher survey data. The findings show that teachers were not heavily involved in developing decision- making processes. However, they agreed with the selected needs, and their involvement in de veloping the decision-making processes accounted for a substantial portion of their agreement.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul R. Brandon & Zhigang Wang & Ronald H. Heck, 1994. "Teacher Involvement in School-Conducted Needs Assessments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(4), pages 458-471, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:18:y:1994:i:4:p:458-471
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9401800405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9401800405
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9401800405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greene, Jennifer C., 1988. "Communication of results and utilization in participatory program evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 341-351, January.
    2. Brandon, Paul R. & Newton, Barbara J. & Harman, James W., 1993. "Enhancing validity through beneficiaries' equitable involvement in identifying and prioritizing homeless children's educational problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 287-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Unruh, Deanne, 2005. "Using primary and secondary stakeholders to define facility-to-community transition needs for adjudicated youth with disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 413-422, November.
    2. Dan Durning, 1993. "Participatory policy analysis in a social service agency: A case study," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(2), pages 297-322.
    3. Daigneault, Pierre-Marc, 2014. "Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: A systematic map," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 171-181.
    4. Neuman, Ari & Shahor, Neria & Shina, Ilan & Sarid, Anat & Saar, Zehava, 2013. "Evaluation utilization research—Developing a theory and putting it to use," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 64-70.
    5. Papineau, Danielle & Kiely, Margaret C., 1996. "Participatory evaluation in a community organization: Fostering stakeholder empowerment and utilization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 79-93, February.
    6. SHI, Jia & LEE, Ching-Hung & GUO, Xuesong & ZHU, Zhengwei, 2020. "Constructing an integrated stakeholder-based participatory policy evaluation model for urban traffic restriction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Valérie Pattyn & Marjolein Bouterse, 2020. "Explaining use and non-use of policy evaluations in a mature evaluation setting," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Karen E. Kirkhart & Robert O. Morgan & Joan Sincavage, 1991. "Assessing Evaluation Performance and Use," Evaluation Review, , vol. 15(4), pages 482-502, August.
    9. Toal, Stacie A. & King, Jean A. & Johnson, Kelli & Lawrenz, Frances, 2009. "The unique character of involvement in multi-site evaluation settings," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 91-98, May.
    10. Geoffrey J. Syme & Brian S. Sadler, 1994. "Evaluation of Public Involvement in Water Resources Planning," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(5), pages 523-542, October.
    11. Brousselle, Astrid & Petit, Geneviève & Giraud, Marie-Josée & Rietmann, Michèle & Boisvert, Krystel & Foley, Véronique, 2016. "Using the evaluation process as a lever for improving health and healthcare accessibility: The case of HCV services organization in Quebec," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 134-143.
    12. Tri Minh Ha & Phuc Van Nguyen, 2017. "Factors Affecting Evaluation Influence in the Public Sector of Cam Lo District, Vietnam," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 309-318.
    13. Wetzel, Mary C. & McNaboe, Chris & McNaboe, Kathleen A., 1995. "A mission based ecological evaluation of a summer camp for youth with developmental disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 37-46.
    14. Johnson, R. Burke, 1998. "Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 93-110, February.
    15. Brandon, Paul R., 1999. "Involving program stakeholders in reviews of evaluators' recommendations for program revisions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 363-372, August.
    16. Turnbull, B., 1999. "The mediating effect of participation efficacy on evaluation use," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 131-140, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:18:y:1994:i:4:p:458-471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.