IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eurjou/v27y2021i3p307-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power resources and supranational mechanisms: The global unions and the OECD Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Ford

    (The University of Sydney, Australia)

  • Michael Gillan

    (The University of Western Australia, Australia)

Abstract

This article uses the power resources approach to analyse the Global Union Federations’ (GUFs) use of the specific instances mechanism associated with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. While this mechanism has serious limitations, it has proved to be a useful tool when combined with public campaigns and the exercise of other power resources at multiple scales. This is so, we argue, because the fact that multi-national enterprises themselves operate across national boundaries creates an incentive to engage power resources at a supranational level, as well as within the countries where they, or their suppliers, are present. As this finding suggests, consideration of unions’ power resources benefits from deeper consideration of the multi-scalar and interrelated character of union action and of the role that intermediary coordinating organizations like GUFs play in supporting the exercise of power at the supranational level.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Ford & Michael Gillan, 2021. "Power resources and supranational mechanisms: The global unions and the OECD Guidelines," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(3), pages 307-325, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:27:y:2021:i:3:p:307-325
    DOI: 10.1177/0959680120988238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0959680120988238
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0959680120988238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michele Ford & Michael Gillan & Htwe Htwe Thein, 2020. "Supranational grievance mechanisms and firm‐level employment relations," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 262-282, July.
    2. Urs LUTERBACHER & Andrew PROSSER & Konstantinos PAPADAKIS, 2017. "An emerging transnational industrial relations? Exploring the prospects for cross†border labour bargaining," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 156(3-4), pages 307-343, December.
    3. Bradon Ellem & Caleb Goods & Patricia Todd, 2020. "Rethinking Power, Strategy and Renewal: Members and Unions in Crisis," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 424-446, June.
    4. Ruggie, John & Nelson, Tamaryn, 2015. "Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Normative Innovations and Implementation Challenges," Working Paper Series rwp15-045, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joey Soehardjojo & Rick Delbridge & Guglielmo Meardi, 2023. "The hidden layers of resistance to dominant HRM transfer: Evidence from Japanese management practice adoption in Indonesia," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(3), pages 679-702, August.
    2. Michele Ford & Michael Gillan, 2022. "Understanding global union repertoires of action," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 559-577, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mary Naughton, 2022. "Mobilising societal power: Understanding public support for nursing strikes," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 93-109, March.
    2. Axel Marx & Franz Ebert & Nicolas Hachez, 2017. "Dispute Settlement for Labour Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Rethinking Current Approaches," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 49-59.
    3. Lohmeyer, Nora & Schüßler, Elke & Helfen, Markus, 2018. "Can solidarity be organized "from below" in global supply chains? The case of ExChains [Kann Solidarität „von unten“ in globalen Zuliefererketten organisiert werden? Der Fall ExChains]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 25(4), pages 400-424.
    4. Caleb Goods & Bradon Ellem, 2023. "Employer associations: Climate change, power and politics," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(2), pages 481-503, May.
    5. Axel Marx & Jan Wouters, 2017. "Rule Intermediaries in Global Labor Governance," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 670(1), pages 189-206, March.
    6. Carolei Domenico, 2022. "Accountability beyond Corporations: The Applicability of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to Non-profit Organisations," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 31-47, January.
    7. Grégory Jemine, 2023. "It takes two to tango: Reconceptualizing union power and union effectiveness in a relational perspective," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 445-470, November.
    8. Pierre Garaudel, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Post-Print halshs-02474817, HAL.
    9. Nienhüser, Werner & Peetz, David & Murray, Georgina & Troup, Carolyn, 2022. "Social media, the internet and the crisis of unionism," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 262, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    10. Michele Ford & Michael Gillan & Htwe Htwe Thein, 2020. "Supranational grievance mechanisms and firm‐level employment relations," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 262-282, July.
    11. Pauline Stanton & Timothy Bartram & Greg J. Bamber, 2022. "The role of nurses' unions in workplace innovation in Australian and Canadian hospitals: Analysing union strategies," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 484-500, September.
    12. Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra de & Bellen, Hans Michael van, 2022. "Institutional dimension for sustainable development: the relationship of organic and conventional cotton farming with government," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(1), January.
    13. Jack Fiorito & Irene Padavic, 2022. "What Do Workers and the Public Want? Unions’ Social Value," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(2), pages 295-320, March.
    14. Garaudel, Pierre, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    15. Nancy D. Ursel & Ligang Zhong, 2022. "Unionization and CEO turnover," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 53-70, January.
    16. Sean O'Brady, 2021. "Fighting precarious work with institutional power: Union inclusion and its limits across spheres of action," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(4), pages 1084-1107, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:27:y:2021:i:3:p:307-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.