IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v20y2002i4p573-592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reinventing Government? Explaining Management Reform at the Hong Kong Housing Authority

Author

Listed:
  • Richard M Walker

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3WA, Wales)

  • Ling Hin Li

    (Centre for Real Estate and Economics, Department of Real Estate and Construction, 5/F, Knowles Building, Hong Kong University, Pokfulham Road, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

In this paper we explain why the Hong Kong Housing Authority (HKHA) is embarking upon a substantial programme of management reform to outsource the management and maintenance of 600 000 units of public rental housing. An international management-reform analytical framework is developed which classifies reforms under the headings of finance, management, ownership, and performance. The application of this framework to reform at the HKHA indicates that the emphasis is upon market-led approaches. The management-reform framework is able to explain aspects of the HKHA approach in relation to searches for reduced costs, downsizing, clearer standards, higher quality, and more customer-responsive services. Alone, however, it is unable to explain fully the reform programme. The housing-policy reforms and the government's aim to increase levels of home-ownership are shown to be major contributory factors to the direction adopted by the HKHA. These case-study findings assert the importance of policy processes for the explanation of management reforms and have implications for the analysis of management reforms in many settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard M Walker & Ling Hin Li, 2002. "Reinventing Government? Explaining Management Reform at the Hong Kong Housing Authority," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 20(4), pages 573-592, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:20:y:2002:i:4:p:573-592
    DOI: 10.1068/c18m
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c18m
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c18m?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pollitt, Christopher & Girre, Xavier & Lonsdale, Jeremy & Mul, Robert & Summa, Hilkka & Waerness, Marit, 1999. "Performance or Compliance?: Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198296003.
    2. Donald F. Kettl, 1997. "The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 446-462.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stuart Kells, 2011. "The Seven Deadly Sins of Performance Auditing: Implications for Monitoring Public Audit Institutions," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(4), pages 383-396, December.
    2. Popoola, Oluwatoyin Muse Johnson & Che-Ahmad, Ayoib & Samsudin, Rose Shamsiah, 2014. "Fraud and Forensic Accounting: Knowledge and Risk Assessment Task Performance in Malaysian Public Sector – Conceptual study," MPRA Paper 66680, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2014.
    3. Regina Pacheco, 2013. "Arm’s Length Bodies in Brazil: Contradictions and Challenges," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 131-141, June.
    4. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2008. "The Challenge of Coordination in Central Government Organizations: The Norwegian Case," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 97-116, June.
    5. Caroline Stiel, 2017. "Modern Public Enterprises: Organisational Innovation and Productivity," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1713, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Mark Christensen & Peter Skærbæk, 2007. "Framing and overflowing of public sector accountability innovations," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 101-132, March.
    7. Munger, Michael C, 2000. "Five Questions: An Integrated Research Agenda for Public Choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 103(1-2), pages 1-12, April.
    8. Jan Buček, 2022. "Comparison of Selected Elements and Processes within the Activity of European SAIs," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 45-66.
    9. Suhyun Baek & Sunah Kim, 2018. "Participatory Public Service Design by Gov.3.0 Design Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Michela Arnaboldi & Irvine Lapsley, 2008. "Making Management Auditable: The Implementation of Best Value in Local Government," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 44(1), pages 22-47, March.
    11. Hyndman, Noel & Liguori, Mariannunziata & Meyer, Renate E. & Polzer, Tobias & Rota, Silvia & Seiwald, Johann, 2014. "The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 388-408.
    12. Martha S. Feldman, 2002. "The global management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(1), pages 145-147.
    13. Gendron, Yves & Cooper, David J. & Townley, Barbara, 2007. "The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-2), pages 101-129.
    14. Popoola, Oluwatoyin Muse Johnson & Che-Ahmad, Ayoib & Samsudin, Rose Shamsiah, 2014. "Forensic Accounting and Fraud: Capability and Competence Requirements in Malaysia," MPRA Paper 66664, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2014.
    15. Weerawardena, Jay & McDonald, Robert E. & Mort, Gillian Sullivan, 2010. "Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 346-356, October.
    16. Yousef Alwardat & Abdullatif Basheikh, 2017. "The Impact of Performance Audit on Public Administrations in Saudi Arabia: An Exploratory Study," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 144-144, November.
    17. Yeon-Seob Ha, 2002. "A Comparative Study of Budgetary and Financial Management Reforms: The Cases of Australia, New Zealand, and Sweden," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 123-136, July.
    18. Matthew Carmona & Louie Sieh, 2008. "Performance Measurement in Planning—Towards a Holistic View," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(2), pages 428-454, April.
    19. Zbyslaw Dobrowolski, 2021. "Are the Supreme Audit Institutions Agile? A Cognitive Orientation and Agility Measures," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 52-62.
    20. Halstead, John M. & Mohr, Robert D. & Deller, Steven C., 2010. "Service Delivery in Rural Municipalities: Privatize, Cooperate, or Go It Alone?," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 60991, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:20:y:2002:i:4:p:573-592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.