IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v49y2022i6p1775-1791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Street edge subdivision: Structuring ground floor interfaces to stimulate pedestrian visual engagement

Author

Listed:
  • James Simpson
  • Megan Freeth
  • Kimberley Jayne Simpson
  • Kevin Thwaites

Abstract

There have been numerous attempts to identify what makes the ground floor interfaces of street edges engaging for pedestrians. Their subdivision has often been highlighted as important, predominantly, in line with functions along their length. However, the effect of subdivision on street edge engagement is yet to be empirically tested. We use mobile eye-tracking to systematically examine where and for how long pedestrians visually engage ground floors in relation to their subdivision. We consider three scales of subdivision: morphologically defined plinths (different building ground floors), territorially defined segments (different areas of territorial ownership) and spatially defined micro-segments (different spaces separated by pillars and partitions). Results show that segments dominate ground floor visual engagement, with micro-segments also having a significant influence. Plinths were shown to have no direct effect upon such engagement. We subsequently use these findings to show how subdivision should be approached by design decision-makers when seeking to actively encourage pedestrian engagement with ground floors along street edges.

Suggested Citation

  • James Simpson & Megan Freeth & Kimberley Jayne Simpson & Kevin Thwaites, 2022. "Street edge subdivision: Structuring ground floor interfaces to stimulate pedestrian visual engagement," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1775-1791, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:1775-1791
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083211068050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083211068050
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083211068050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oh, Hyunjoo & Petrie, Jenny, 2012. "How do storefront window displays influence entering decisions of clothing stores?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 27-35.
    2. Kim Dovey & Stephen Wood, 2015. "Public/private urban interfaces: type, adaptation, assemblage," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Halekoh, Ulrich & Højsgaard, Søren, 2014. "A Kenward-Roger Approximation and Parametric Bootstrap Methods for Tests in Linear Mixed Models The R Package pbkrtest," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 59(i09).
    4. James Simpson & Kevin Thwaites & Megan Freeth, 2019. "Understanding Visual Engagement with Urban Street Edges along Non-Pedestrianised and Pedestrianised Streets Using Mobile Eye-Tracking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Vikas Mehta & Binita Mahato, 2019. "Measuring the robustness of neighbourhood business districts," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 99-118, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongguo Ren & Lei Zhang & Jing Zhang & Xue Wang & Qingqin Wang, 2024. "Exploration of a Rural Street Environment: The Difference in Sight between Villagers and Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nawaf Saeed Al Mushayt & Francesca Dal Cin & Sérgio Barreiros Proença, 2021. "New Lens to Reveal the Street Interface. A Morphological-Visual Perception Methodological Contribution for Decoding the Public/Private Edge of Arterial Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Martin, Manon & Govaerts, Bernadette, 2019. "LiMM-PCA : combining ASCA+ and linear mixed models to analyse high dimensional designed data," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019021, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    3. Paul E. Rose & James E. Brereton & Lewis J. Rowden & Ricardo Lemos Figueiredo & Lisa M. Riley, 2019. "What’s new from the zoo? An analysis of ten years of zoo-themed research output," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Pantano, Eleonora, 2016. "Engaging consumer through the storefront: Evidences from integrating interactive technologies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 149-154.
    5. Ian Carter & Stefano Moroni, 2022. "Adaptive and anti-adaptive neighbourhoods: Investigating the relationship between individual choice and systemic adaptability," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 722-736, February.
    6. Aimee Felstead & Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Urban Commoning in Shared Residential Landscapes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Byron C. Jaeger & Lloyd J. Edwards & Kalyan Das & Pranab K. Sen, 2017. "An statistic for fixed effects in the generalized linear mixed model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 1086-1105, April.
    8. Waseem Alnosaier & David Birkes, 2019. "Inner workings of the Kenward–Roger test," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 195-223, March.
    9. Julie Gamble, 2017. "Experimental Infrastructure: Experiences in Bicycling in Quito, Ecuador," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 162-180, January.
    10. Lenth, Russell V., 2016. "Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 69(i01).
    11. Pantano, Eleonora & Viassone, Milena & Boardman, Rosy & Dennis, Charles, 2022. "Inclusive or exclusive? Investigating how retail technology can reduce old consumers’ barriers to shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Sebastian Loth & Katharina Jettka & Manuel Giuliani & Stefan Kopp & Jan P de Ruiter, 2018. "Confidence in uncertainty: Error cost and commitment in early speech hypotheses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-30, August.
    13. Menon, R.G. Vishnu & Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Fagerstrøm, Asle & Foxall, Gordon R., 2016. "Consumer attention to price in social commerce: Eye tracking patterns in retail clothing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5008-5013.
    14. King, K.W. & Hanrahan, B.R. & Stinner, J. & Shedekar, V.S., 2022. "Field scale discharge and water quality response, to drainage water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    15. Mirna Zordan & Gianni Talamini & Caterina Villani, 2019. "The Association between Ground Floor Features and Public Open Space Face-To-Face Interactions: Evidence from Nantou Village, Shenzhen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Gesche Janzarik & Daniel Wollschläger & Michèle Wessa & Klaus Lieb, 2022. "A Group Intervention to Promote Resilience in Nursing Professionals: A Randomised Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Peter H. Bloch & Omid Kamran-Disfani, 2018. "A framework for studying the impact of outdoor atmospherics in retailing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 195-213, December.
    18. Govaerts, B. & Francq, B. & Marion, R. & Martin, M. & Thiel, M., 2020. "The essentials on linear regression, ANOVA, general linear and linear mixed models for the chemist," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2020012, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    19. Evgeniya Bobkova & Meta Berghauser Pont & Lars Marcus, 2021. "Towards analytical typologies of plot systems: Quantitative profile of five European cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 604-620, May.
    20. Mirela Octavia Sirbu & Andreea Simona Saseanu & Simona Ioana Ghita, 2015. "Consumers` perception on the use of innovative technologies in creating store atmosphere," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(39), pages 567-567, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:1775-1791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.