IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v45y2018i6p1106-1121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the role of barriers in shaping segregation profiles: The importance of visualizing the local neighborhood

Author

Listed:
  • Rory Kramer

Abstract

“Egocentric†segregation profiles allow researchers to avoid a reliance on a priori definitions of local neighborhoods that contribute an unknown amount of error to measures of segregation. To date, however, such profiles have used distance-decay techniques that rely on “as the crow flies†measures of space. Yet we know that major roads, railroads, and other physical attributes of space mean that such techniques may introduce error into the measurement and visualization of residential segregation. Here, I use a variation on standard smoothing techniques that allows the smoothing function to vary based on a second variable of interest, in this case, the location of major roads, railroads, and nonresidential land use. Using Philadelphia as a case study due to access to detailed land-use data, I show that barriers do not affect observed values of city-level racial and ethnic dissimilarity. Visualizing the impact of barriers on local neighborhoods, however, shows that while barriers may not affect city-wide indexes of segregation, they continue to powerfully shape local experiences of the city, including protecting new immigrant ethnic enclaves, wealthy white neighborhoods, and also isolating high-poverty, predominantly black neighborhoods in different parts of the city.

Suggested Citation

  • Rory Kramer, 2018. "Testing the role of barriers in shaping segregation profiles: The importance of visualizing the local neighborhood," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1106-1121, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:45:y:2018:i:6:p:1106-1121
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808318766067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808318766067
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808318766067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George C. Galster, 2008. "Quantifying the Effect of Neighbourhood on Individuals: Challenges, Alternative Approaches, and Promising Directions," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 128(1), pages 7-48.
    2. Sean Reardon & Stephen Matthews & David O’Sullivan & Barrett Lee & Glenn Firebaugh & Chad Farrell & Kendra Bischoff, 2008. "The geographic scale of Metropolitan racial segregation," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(3), pages 489-514, August.
    3. J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (ed.), 2004. "Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 4, number 4.
    4. Richard Mitchell & Duncan Lee, 2014. "Is There Really a “Wrong Side of the Tracks”in Urban Areas and Does It Matter for Spatial Analysis?," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(3), pages 432-443, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Galster & Anna Santiago, 2017. "Neighbourhood ethnic composition and outcomes for low-income Latino and African American children," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 482-500, February.
    2. Lea Eilers & Alfredo R. Paloyo & Peggy Bechara, 2022. "The effect of peer employment and neighborhood characteristics on individual employment," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1885-1908, April.
    3. Lina Hedman & David Manley & Maarten van Ham & John Östh, 2015. "Cumulative exposure to disadvantage and the intergenerational transmission of neighbourhood effects," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 195-215.
    4. Christopher S Fowler, 2018. "Key assumptions in multiscale segregation measures: How zoning and strength of spatial association condition outcomes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1055-1072, November.
    5. Gabriel Otero & Rafael Carranza & Dante Contreras, 2017. "‘Neighbourhood effects’ on children's educational achievement in Chile: The effects of inequality and polarization," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(11), pages 2595-2618, November.
    6. David Kretschmer & Hanno Kruse, 2020. "Neighbourhood effects on acculturation attitudes among minority and majority adolescents in Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3363-3380, December.
    7. Sandro Sousa & Vincenzo Nicosia, 2022. "Quantifying ethnic segregation in cities through random walks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Olga Alonso-Villar & Coral Del RÍo, 2012. "Concentration of Economic Activity: Inequality-Based Measures," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 223-246, June.
    9. Diane Coffey & Ashwini Deshpande & Jeffrey Hammer & Dean Spears, 2019. "Local Social Inequality, Economic Inequality, and Disparities in Child Height in India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(4), pages 1427-1452, August.
    10. María Ayuda & Fernando Collantes & Vicente Pinilla, 2010. "From locational fundamentals to increasing returns: the spatial concentration of population in Spain, 1787–2000," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 25-50, March.
    11. Vasco Leite & Sofia Castro & João Correia-da-Silva, 2009. "The core periphery model with asymmetric inter-regional and intra-regional trade costs," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 8(1), pages 37-44, April.
    12. Azariadis, Costas & Stachurski, John, 2005. "Poverty Traps," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, Elsevier.
    13. Wang, Xu & Zhang, Xiaobo & Xie, Zhuan & Huang, Yiping, 2016. "Roads to innovation: Firm-level evidence from China:," IFPRI discussion papers 1542, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Sue Easton & Loretta Lees & Phil Hubbard & Nicholas Tate, 2020. "Measuring and mapping displacement: The problem of quantification in the battle against gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 286-306, February.
    15. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer, 2008. "Detection Of Local Interactions From The Spatial Pattern Of Names In France," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 67-95, February.
    16. Lina Ahlin & Martin Andersson & Per Thulin, 2014. "Market Thickness and the Early Labour Market Career of University Graduates: An Urban Advantage?," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 396-419, October.
    17. Mayer, T. & Mejean, I. & Nefussi, B., 2010. "The location of domestic and foreign production affiliates by French multinational firms," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 115-128, September.
    18. Tom Broekel & Matthias Brachert & Matthias Duschl & Thomas Brenner, 2015. "Joint R and D subsidies, related variety, and regional innovation," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2015-01, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    19. Ernest Miguelez & Rosina Moreno, 2017. "Networks, Diffusion of Knowledge, and Regional Innovative Performance," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(4), pages 331-336, July.
    20. Camilla Lenzi & Giovanni Perucca, 2021. "Not too close, not too far: Urbanisation and life satisfaction along the urban hierarchy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2742-2757, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:45:y:2018:i:6:p:1106-1121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.