IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v12y1985i3p303-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prescriptive Analysis in Planning

Author

Listed:
  • H Voogd

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Urban and Regional Planning Group, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft)

Abstract

In this paper the subject of prescriptive analysis in spatial planning is dealt with. The point is made that all planners to some extent engage in prescriptive analysis. It is argued that this kind of analysis need not be equated with a technocratic exercise provided that the analyst recognises explicitly that public planning is influenced to a large extent by the political arena, with many uncertainties and with rapidly shifting priorities. An overview of various decision theoretical approaches is given, and a discussion presented of various prescriptive approaches in planning.

Suggested Citation

  • H Voogd, 1985. "Prescriptive Analysis in Planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 12(3), pages 303-312, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:12:y:1985:i:3:p:303-312
    DOI: 10.1068/b120303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b120303
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b120303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lootsma, F. A., 1980. "Saaty's priority theory and the nomination of a senior professor in operations Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 4(6), pages 380-388, June.
    2. J. H. P. Paelinck, 1976. "Qualitative Multiple Criteria Analysis, Environmental Protection And Multiregional Development," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 59-76, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konstantin Fisun & Mariya Naumenko & Nadiya Bortnyk, 2018. "Price Of The Efficiency Of Functioning Of Organizational Systems Using Expert Methods," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(3).
    2. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    3. Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel & Renata Korsakienė & Agota Giedrė Raišienė & Yuriy Bilan, 2019. "IT2 Hybrid Decision-Making Approach to Performance Measurement of Internationalized Firms in the Baltic States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Milad Kolagar & Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini & Ramin Felegari & Parviz Fattahi, 2020. "Policy-making for renewable energy sources in search of sustainable development: a hybrid DEA-FBWM approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 485-509, December.
    5. Sureeyatanapas, Panitas & Sriwattananusart, Kawinpob & Niyamosoth, Thanawath & Sessomboon, Weerapat & Arunyanart, Sirawadee, 2018. "Supplier selection towards uncertain and unavailable information: An extension of TOPSIS method," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 69-79.
    6. Nijkamp, P. & Soffer, A., 1979. "Soft multicriteria decision models for urban renewal plans," Serie Research Memoranda 0005, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    7. Zhenyu Zhang & Jie Lin & Huirong Zhang & Shuangsheng Wu & Dapei Jiang, 2020. "Hybrid TODIM Method for Law Enforcement Possibility Evaluation of Judgment Debtor," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Xiaoli Tian & Zeshui Xu & Xinxin Wang & Jing Gu & Fawaz E. Alsaadi, 2019. "Decision Models to Find a Promising Start-Up Firm with Qualiflex under Probabilistic Linguistic Circumstance," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1379-1402, July.
    9. Juan-juan Peng & Jian-qiang Wang & Wu-E Yang, 2017. "A multi-valued neutrosophic qualitative flexible approach based on likelihood for multi-criteria decision-making problems," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 425-435, January.
    10. Van Dijk, Herman K. & Kloek, Teun & Boender, C. Guus E., 1985. "Posterior moments computed by mixed integration," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1-2), pages 3-18.
    11. Michel Grabisch, 2008. "How to score alternatives when criteria are scored on an ordinal scale," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00340381, HAL.
    12. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    13. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Miebs, Grzegorz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2022. "Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 633-651.
    14. Isard Walter & Anderton Charles H., 1999. "Survey of the Peace Economics Literature: Recent Key Contributions and a Comprehensive Coverage Up to 1992 (Part I)," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(4), pages 1-42, October.
    15. Chao Tian & Wen Yu Zhang & Shuai Zhang & Juan Juan Peng, 2019. "An Extended Single-Valued Neutrosophic Projection-Based Qualitative Flexible Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Shapiro, Arnold F. & Koissi, Marie-Claire, 2017. "Fuzzy logic modifications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 189-202.
    17. Hinloopen, E. & Nijkamp, P., 1986. "Qualitative multiple criteria choice analysis : the dominant regime method," Serie Research Memoranda 0045, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    18. Peter Nijkamp, 1979. "Conflict Patterns and Compromise Solutions in Fuzzy Choice Theory," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 4(1), pages 67-90, February.
    19. Ahn, Byeong Seok, 2017. "Approximate weighting method for multiattribute decision problems with imprecise parameters," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 87-95.
    20. Rofiat Bunmi Mudashiru & Nuridah Sabtu & Rozi Abdullah & Azlan Saleh & Ismail Abustan, 2022. "A comparison of three multi-criteria decision-making models in mapping flood hazard areas of Northeast Penang, Malaysia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(3), pages 1903-1939, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:12:y:1985:i:3:p:303-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.