IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v52y2020i3p478-482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional delineation of China based on commuting flows

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyan Mu

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Anthony Gar-On Yeh

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Delineating functional regions by association and connectivity has attracted much attention in urban and regional studies. Commuting ties reflect the social and economic interactions between places. However, most commuting studies are at the city level. A national-scale commuting map of China has not been drawn. This study employs computational and visual methods to model and visualize the commuting flows between county-level units. We use a dataset extracted from the 2015 One Percent Population Sample Survey of China provided by the National Bureau of Statistics. China can be algorithmically divided into new commuting regions based on the functional network of commuting flows. The results provide a valuable perspective to understand how people live, work and move across boundaries of administrative units in a daily urban system. Different administrative units in the same commuting region should have inter-jurisdictional cooperation to improve the efficiency of resource allocation and maximize the benefits of investments. We suggest that policy makers take commuting regions that cross administrative units into account when making regional transportation, trans-territorial infrastructure or investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyan Mu & Anthony Gar-On Yeh, 2020. "Regional delineation of China based on commuting flows," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 478-482, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:3:p:478-482
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X19873006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X19873006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X19873006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Garrett Dash Nelson & Alasdair Rae, 2016. "An Economic Geography of the United States: From Commutes to Megaregions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoyan Mu & Anthony Gar-On Yeh & Xiaohu Zhang & Jiejing Wang & Jian Lin, 2022. "Moving down the urban hierarchy: Turning point of China’s internal migration caused by age structure and hukou system," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1389-1405, May.
    2. Lucas Martínez-Bernabéu & José Manuel Casado-Díaz, 2022. "Automatic delimitation of labour market areas based on multi-criteria optimisation: The case of Spain 2011," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 654-670, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark He & Joseph Glasser & Nathaniel Pritchard & Shankar Bhamidi & Nikhil Kaza, 2020. "Demarcating geographic regions using community detection in commuting networks with significant self-loops," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-31, April.
    2. Wenqian Ke & Wei Chen & Zhaoyuan Yu, 2017. "Uncovering Spatial Structures of Regional City Networks from Expressway Traffic Flow Data: A Case Study from Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Garrett Dash Nelson, 2021. "Communities, Complexity, and the ‘Conchoration’: Network Analysis and the Ontology of Geographic Units," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(4), pages 351-369, September.
    4. Agovino, Massimiliano & Crociata, Alessandro & Sacco, Pier Luigi, 2019. "Proximity effects in obesity rates in the US: A Spatial Markov Chains approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 301-311.
    5. Wangbao Liu & Quan Hou & Zhihao Xie & Xin Mai, 2020. "Urban Network and Regions in China: An Analysis of Daily Migration with Complex Networks Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    6. Madeleine I. G. Daepp, 2022. "Small-area moving ratios and the spatial connectivity of neighborhoods: Insights from consumer credit data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 1129-1146, March.
    7. Kyusang Kwon & Minho Seo, 2018. "Does the Polycentric Urban Region Contribute to Economic Performance? The Case of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, November.
    8. Amin Khiali-Miab & Maarten J van Strien & Kay W Axhausen & Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, 2019. "Combining urban scaling and polycentricity to explain socio-economic status of urban regions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Yoonjee Baek & Heesun Joo, 2022. "A Study on the Spatial Structure of the Bu-Ul-Gyeong Megacity Using the City Network Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Geoff Boeing, 2018. "Estimating local daytime population density from census and payroll data," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 179-182, January.
    11. Beckers, Joris & Vanhoof, Maarten & Verhetsel, Ann, 2019. "Returning the particular: Understanding hierarchies in the Belgian logistics system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 315-324.
    12. Ryan Thomas & Stephan Schmidt & Stefan Siedentop, 2022. "Toward comparative polycentricity scores: Assessing variations in regional delineation and subcenter identification," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1597-1611, July.
    13. Nikhil Kaza & Katherine Nesse, 2021. "Characterizing the Regional Structure in the United States: A County-based Analysis of Labor Market Centrality," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 44(5), pages 560-581, September.
    14. Ben Derudder, 2021. "Network Analysis of ‘Urban Systems’: Potential, Challenges, and Pitfalls," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(4), pages 404-420, September.
    15. Ruth Hamilton & Alasdair Rae, 2020. "Regions from the ground up: a network partitioning approach to regional delineation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(5), pages 775-789, June.
    16. Neal, Zachary P. & Derudder, Ben & van Meeteren, Michiel, 2022. "When is a matrix a geographical network?," OSF Preprints 6jhzm, Center for Open Science.
    17. Marcińczak, Szymon & Bartosiewicz, Bartosz, 2018. "Commuting patterns and urban form: Evidence from Poland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 31-39.
    18. Georg von Graevenitz & Stuart J. H. Graham & Amanda F. Myers, 2022. "Distance (still) hampers diffusion of innovations," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 227-241, February.
    19. Ziqi Liu & Ming Zhang & Liwen Liu, 2021. "Benchmark of the Trends of Spatial Inequality in World Megaregions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Lucas Martínez‐Bernabéu & José Manuel Casado‐Díaz, 2021. "Standard modularity is unsuitable for functional regionalization of spatial interaction data," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(5), pages 1323-1330, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:3:p:478-482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.