IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v50y2018i4p922-938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shifting modes of governing municipal waste – A sociology of translation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Guzman
  • Mariana Mayumi P De Souza

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the shifting of modes of governing municipal waste, from disposal (waste-to-landfill) to waste as a resource (sustainable recycling). To this end, we frame this study combining the modes of governing approach developed by Bulkeley, Watson and Hudson with Bruno Latour’s sociology of translation approach (or Actor-Network Theory). Within this double framework, we investigate practices that emerge from the attempts made by multiple stakeholders to shift modes of governing waste. This study contributes to the modes of governing waste in particular and, to environmental policy implementation studies in general. We posit that shifting governing modes involves (i) the construction of human–non-human networks that support the stabilization of a particular governing mode; (ii) consideration of the role of non-humans , their agency and materiality and; (iii) the acknowledgement that counter-networks and unintended consequences are likely to emerge. When we add to this view the role of politics, a more complex, dynamic and rich picture of the phenomenon surfaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Guzman & Mariana Mayumi P De Souza, 2018. "Shifting modes of governing municipal waste – A sociology of translation approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(4), pages 922-938, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:50:y:2018:i:4:p:922-938
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X18763609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X18763609
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X18763609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Courpasson & Damon Golsorkhi & Jeffrey J. Sallaz, 2012. "Rethinking Power in Organizations, Institutions, and Markets : Classical Perspectives, Current Research, and the Future Agenda," Post-Print hal-02312215, HAL.
    2. Nicky Gregson & Mike Crang, 2010. "Materiality and Waste: Inorganic Vitality in a Networked World," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(5), pages 1026-1032, May.
    3. Richard Bull & Judith Petts & James Evans, 2010. "The importance of context for effective public engagement: learning from the governance of waste," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(8), pages 991-1009.
    4. Gavin Parker & Amanda Wragg, 1999. "Networks, Agency and (De)stabilization: The Issue of Navigation on the River Wye, UK," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 471-487.
    5. Maria Helena Guimarães & Annie McKee & Maria Lu�sa Lima & Lia Vasconcelos & Tomasz Boski & Tomaz Dentinho, 2015. "Putting transdisciplinarity into practice: a mixed mode procedure for stakeholder participation in natural resource management," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 1827-1852, October.
    6. Harriet Bulkeley & Matt Watson & Ray Hudson, 2007. "Modes of Governing Municipal Waste," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2733-2753, November.
    7. Simin Davoudi, 2009. "Governing waste: introduction to the special issue," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 131-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne P. M. Velenturf & Phil Purnell, 2017. "Resource Recovery from Waste: Restoring the Balance between Resource Scarcity and Waste Overload," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Measham, Thomas G. & Zhang, Airong, 2019. "Social licence, gender and mining: Moral conviction and perceived economic importance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 363-368.
    3. Ruth Lane, 2014. "Understanding the Dynamic Character of Value in Recycling Metals from Australia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, April.
    4. E. DuPuis & Sean Gillon, 2009. "Alternative modes of governance: organic as civic engagement," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 26(1), pages 43-56, March.
    5. Sebastian Ureta, 2016. "Caring for waste: Handling tailings in a Chilean copper mine," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(8), pages 1532-1548, August.
    6. Lampel, Linda, 2020. "Value capture and distribution in second-hand clothing trade: The role of charity discourses, commercial strategies and economic and political contexts," ÖFSE-Forum, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), volume 72, number 72, Juni.
    7. Pauline Deutz & Gareth Neighbour & Michael McGuire, 2010. "Integrating sustainable waste management into product design: sustainability as a functional requirement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 229-239.
    8. Stefan Nier & Oliver Klein & Christine Tamásy, 2019. "Global Crop Value Chains: Shifts and Challenges in South-North Relations," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Nuno Ferreira da Cruz & Pedro Simões & Rui Cunha Marques, 2013. "The Hurdles of Local Governments with Ppp Contracts in the Waste Sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(2), pages 292-307, April.
    10. S. M. Mizanur Rahman & Chelsea Schelly & Audrey L. Mayer & Emma S. Norman, 2018. "Uncovering Discursive Framings of the Bangladesh Shipbreaking Industry," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Pauline McGuirk & Robyn Dowling & Harriet Bulkeley, 2014. "Repositioning urban governments? Energy efficiency and Australia’s changing climate and energy governance regimes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2717-2734, October.
    12. Nutcha Charoenboon & Marco J. Haenssgen & Penporn Warapikuptanun & Thipphaphone Xayavong & Yuzana Khine Zaw, 2019. "Translating antimicrobial resistance: a case study of context and consequences of antibiotic-related communication in three northern Thai villages," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Joshua Lohnes & Bradley Wilson, 2018. "Bailing out the food banks? Hunger relief, food waste, and crisis in Central Appalachia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 350-369, March.
    14. Harriet Bulkeley & Gareth Powells & Sandra Bell, 2016. "Smart grids and the constitution of solar electricity conduct," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(1), pages 7-23, January.
    15. Carla De Laurentis & Malcolm Eames & Miriam Hunt, 2017. "Retrofitting the built environment ‘to save’ energy: Arbed, the emergence of a distinctive sustainability transition pathway in Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(7), pages 1156-1175, November.
    16. Lily B Pollans, 2017. "Trapped in trash: ‘Modes of governing’ and barriers to transitioning to sustainable waste management," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(10), pages 2300-2323, October.
    17. Hickle, Garth T., 2014. "An examination of governance within extended producer responsibility policy regimes in North America," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 55-65.
    18. Debi Parush & Deborah F. Shmueli, 2024. "Integrating Framing Approaches as a Tool for Managing Complex Transitioning to Renewable Energy (TRE) Projects: The Yatir Wind Farm Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-28, April.
    19. Büscher, Chris, 2023. "Turning poo into profit? The troubled politics of a biogas-based sanitation business model in Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    20. Eckerberg, Katarina & Buizer, Marleen, 2017. "Promises and dilemmas in forest fire management decision-making: Exploring conditions for community engagement in Australia and Sweden," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 133-140.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:50:y:2018:i:4:p:922-938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.