IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v36y2004i1p127-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralization or Recentralization? A Question of Household versus Population Enumeration, Canadian Metropolitan Areas 1971–1996

Author

Listed:
  • Trudi E Bunting

    (Department of Geography and School of Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2GI, Canada)

Abstract

The author considers patterns of population growth and density occurring in Canadian metropolitan areas (CMAs) over the 25-year period 1971–96. Two different sets of data, population and household, are examined with the aid of distance-decay density gradients and enumeration of intrazonal change in census tracts defined as core area (census tracts immediately adjacent to the central business district), inner city, and suburban. Important differences are found when household data are used in lieu of population data. In the core and inner city, household change points towards an overall pattern of recentralization and, in the suburbs, to intensification of development—albeit muted. This contrasts with an accentuated trend to decentralization witnessed in the population-based analyses. The author concludes that centralization is an active force in most CMAs, although it is not as strong a force as decentralization. It is also suggested that there is great diversity between the twenty-two CMAs that make up the dataset. Most important is the demonstration that evidence based on population trends alone is not sufficient to gauge changing patterns of intrametropolitan population distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Trudi E Bunting, 2004. "Decentralization or Recentralization? A Question of Household versus Population Enumeration, Canadian Metropolitan Areas 1971–1996," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 127-147, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:1:p:127-147
    DOI: 10.1068/a35204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a35204
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a35204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papageorgiou, Yorgos Y. & Pines, David, 1989. "The exponential density function: First principles, comparative statics, and empirical evidence," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 264-268, September.
    2. Richardson, Harry W, 1988. "Monocentric vs. Policentric Models: The Future of Urban Economics in Regional Science," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick Rérat, 2012. "The New Demographic Growth of Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(5), pages 1107-1125, April.
    2. Fazley Siddiq & Shira Babins, 2013. "Trends in Population Growth Inequality across Subnational Jurisdictions in Canada 1," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 39(s1), pages 41-64, May.
    3. Rafa Madariaga & Joan Carles Martori & Ramon Oller, 2011. "Income, distance and spatial effects in the Monocentric model. The Barcelona Metropolitan Area case," ERSA conference papers ersa11p511, European Regional Science Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hugh Millward & Trudi Bunting, 2008. "Patterning in Urban Population Densities: A Spatiotemporal Model Compared with Toronto 1971–2001," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(2), pages 283-302, February.
    2. T. Bunting & P. Filion & H. Priston, 2002. "Density Gradients in Canadian Metropolitan Regions, 1971-96: Differential Patterns of Central Area and Suburban Growth and Change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(13), pages 2531-2552, December.
    3. P Gordon & J E Moore II, 1989. "Endogenizing the Rise and Fall of Urban Subcenters via Discrete Programming Models," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(9), pages 1195-1203, September.
    4. Gershon Alperovich & Joeseph Deutsch, 1992. "Population Density Gradients and Urbanisation Measurement," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(8), pages 1323-1328, December.
    5. Alegria, Tito, 2016. "Polycentric versus hierarchical tertiary centres: comparing San Diego and Tijuana," MPRA Paper 98145, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Shunfeng Song, 1994. "Modelling Worker Residence Distribution in the Los Angeles Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(9), pages 1533-1544, November.
    7. Kala Seetharam Sridhar & Shivakumar Nayka, 2022. "Determinants of Commute Time in an Indian City," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 16(1), pages 49-75, February.
    8. Anas, Alex & Arnott, Richard J. & Small, Kenneth A., 2000. "The Panexponential Monocentric Model," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 165-179, March.
    9. repec:npf:wpaper:23 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Michael Iacono & David Levinson, 2017. "Accessibility dynamics and location premia: Do land values follow accessibility changes?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 364-381, February.
    11. Lambert van der Laan, 1998. "Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models," ERSA conference papers ersa98p252, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Hui Wang & Feng Yuan & Yehua Dennis Wei & Wen Chen & Lei Wang, 2021. "Understanding spatial and compositional dynamics of employment centers in urban China: Empirical evidence from Nanjing," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2635-2661, December.
    13. Shanaka Herath, 2011. "Does it matter how far you live from the city centre? A study of apartment values in Vienna," ERES eres2011_97, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    14. Alex Anas & Richard Arnott & Kenneth A. Small, 1998. "Urban Spatial Structure," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1426-1464, September.
    15. Hsieh, Wen-Hua & Irwin, Elena G. & Forster, D. Lynn, 2000. "Spatial Dependence Among County-Level Land Use Changes," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21852, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Sridhar, Kala Seetharam, 2004. "Cities with suburbs: Evidence from India," Working Papers 04/23, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    17. Liv Osland & Inge Thorsen, 2008. "Effects on Housing Prices of Urban Attraction and Labor-Market Accessibility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(10), pages 2490-2509, October.
    18. Sanjoy Chakravorty, 1996. "A Measurement of Spatial Disparity: The Case of Income Inequality," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(9), pages 1671-1686, November.
    19. Anne Aguilera, 2005. "Growth in Commuting Distances in French Polycentric Metropolitan Areas: Paris, Lyon and Marseille," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(9), pages 1537-1547, August.
    20. Alain Bertraud & Stephen Malpezzi, 2001. "The Spatial Distribution of Population in 35 World Cities: The Role of Markets, Planning, and Topography," Wisconsin-Madison CULER working papers 01-03, University of Wisconsin Center for Urban Land Economic Research.
    21. repec:ind:nipfwp:23 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Bumsoo Lee & Peter Gordon, 2010. "Urban Structure: It's Role in Urban Growth, Net New Business Formation and Industrial Churn," Working Paper 8515, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:1:p:127-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.