IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v23y2012i4p647-655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Free-Market Energy

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander M. Schaefer
  • Walter E. Block

Abstract

There should be no governmental energy policy, nor any department of energy, for that matter. All decisions concerning fuel, up to and including nuclear power, should be based on private property rights and the tenets of laissez faire capitalism. This would assure the proper assumption of risk and ideal resource allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander M. Schaefer & Walter E. Block, 2012. "Free-Market Energy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 23(4), pages 647-655, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:647-655
    DOI: 10.1260/0958-305X.23.4.647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/0958-305X.23.4.647
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1260/0958-305X.23.4.647?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murray Rothbard, 1982. "Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 55-99, Spring.
    2. Higgs, Robert, 1994. "Banning a Risky Product Cannot Improve Any Consumer's Welfare (Properly Understood), With Applications to FDA Testing Requirements," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 3-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Groeneveld, Rolf A. & Wesseler, Justus & Berentsen, Paul B.M., 2013. "Dominos in the dairy: An analysis of transgenic maize in Dutch dairy farming," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-116.
    2. William Hongsong Wang & Vicente Moreno-Casas & Jesús Huerta de Soto, 2021. "A Free-Market Environmentalist Transition toward Renewable Energy: The Cases of Germany, Denmark, and the United Kingdom," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Jankovic Ivan & Block Walter, 2019. "Private Property Rights, Government Interventionism and Welfare Economics," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 19(4), pages 365-397, December.
    4. Marc David Davidson, 2021. "How Fairness Principles in the Climate Debate Relate to Theories of Distributive Justice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Gage Counts & Walter E Block, 2016. "Fracking: A creature of government?," Energy & Environment, , vol. 27(8), pages 933-941, December.
    6. Walter E. Block, 2017. "Radical Privatization: Oceans, Roads,Heavenly Bodies," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 12(2), pages 41-56, June.
    7. Victor I. Espinosa & José Antonio Peña-Ramos & Fátima Recuero-López, 2021. "The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking: Evidence from Spain’s Support Policies for Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Tamara Todorova, 2007. "The Coase Theorem Revisited: Implications for Economic Transition," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 35(2), pages 189-201, June.
    9. Mihaela Iacob & Rodica Gherghina & Georgiana Camelia Cre?an, 2019. "„Comparative (Bio)Economic Systems” in Terms of Social Responsibility: The Natural Environment – Between Ideal Capitalism, Utopian Socialism and Real-World Interventionism," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 707-707, August.
    10. Block Walter & Block Mattew, 1996. "Roads, Brtoges, Sunlight, and Private Property Rights," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2-3), pages 1-12, June.
    11. Emily Schaeffer & Walter Block, 2007. "The Economics of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge," Energy & Environment, , vol. 18(1), pages 75-85, January.
    12. Octavian-Dragomir Jora & Matei-Alexandru Apăvăloaei & Vlad I. Roșca & Mihaela Iacob, 2020. "“Mens Sana in Sound Corporations”: A Principled Reconciliation Between Profitability and Responsibility, With a Focus on Environmental Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Skevas, Theodoros & Fevereiro, Pedro & Wesseler, Justus, 2010. "Coexistence regulations and agriculture production: A case study of five Bt maize producers in Portugal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2402-2408, October.
    14. Fox, Glenn, 1997. "Environmental Policy Harmonization: Comment," Proceedings of the 3rd Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1997: Harmonization\Convergence\Compatibility in Agriculture and Agri-Food Policy: Canada, United States and Mexico 16892, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    15. Daniel B. Klein, 2008. "Colleagues, Where Is the Market Failure? Economists on the FDA," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 5(3), pages 316-348, September.
    16. Makovi, Michael, 2015. "The "Self-Defeating Morality" of the Lockean Proviso," MPRA Paper 65621, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Jordan Reel & Walter E. Block, 2013. "Educational Vouchers: Freedom to Choose?," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 7(4), December.
    18. William Hongsong Wang & Victor I. Espinosa & Jesús Huerta de Soto, 2022. "A Free-Market Environmentalist Enquiry on Spain’s Energy Transition along with Its Recent Increasing Electricity Prices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-34, August.
    19. Makovi, Michael, 2015. "The Welfare Costs of Rent-Seeking: A Methodologically Individualist & Subjectivist Revision," MPRA Paper 63270, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Klein, Daniel, 2003. "Mere Libertarianism: Blending Hayek and Rothbard," Ratio Working Papers 29, The Ratio Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:647-655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.