IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v16y1998i2p125-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R. J. Rummel's Understanding Conflict and War: An Overlooked Classic?

Author

Listed:
  • James Lee Ray

    (Vanderbilt University)

Abstract

R.J. Rummel's five volume work Understanding Conflict and War is an ambitious, comprehensive theoretical approach to international as well as domestic conflict. It provides a substantial theoretical as well as epistemological basis for the democratic peace proposition, which has received a lot of attention in recent years. Yet most writers in the field seem unaware of the roots of that proposition in this 5 volume work. The democratic peace proposition is only one of the 33 interrelated propositions regarding the causes of international conflict developed in Understanding Conflict and War. Many others, regarding the argument that international politics are less violent than domestic politics, or the impact of power transitions, or of recurring crises, or of geographic contiguity, or of regime type of states in general, and not just on their relationships with each other, play a prominent role in important contemporary research efforts. The theoretical approach developed by Rummel may have important potential to integrate and/or subsume all of these “islands of theory.†It may also provide an alternative to rational choice, or formal methods of developing a theory of international conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • James Lee Ray, 1998. "R. J. Rummel's Understanding Conflict and War: An Overlooked Classic?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 16(2), pages 125-147, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:16:y:1998:i:2:p:125-147
    DOI: 10.1177/073889429801600202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/073889429801600202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/073889429801600202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huth, Paul & Gelpi, Christopher & Bennett, D. Scott, 1993. "The Escalation of Great Power Militarized Disputes: Testing Rational Deterrence Theory and Structural Realism," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(3), pages 609-623, September.
    2. Aurélie Charles, 2012. "Introduction," Perspectives from Social Economics, in: Exchange Entitlement Mapping, pages 1-7, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence J. Christiano & Roberto Motto & Massimo Rostagno, 2003. "The Great Depression and the Friedman-Schwartz hypothesis," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, pages 1119-1215.
    2. Jacob K. Goeree & Charles A. Holt, 2001. "Ten Little Treasures of Game Theory and Ten Intuitive Contradictions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1402-1422, December.
    3. Bart Hawkins Kreps, 2020. "Energy Sprawl in the Renewable‐Energy Sector: Moving to Sufficiency in a Post Growth Era," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3), pages 719-749, May.
    4. G. D. Hess, 1995. "An Introduction To Lewis Fry Richardson and His Mathematical Theory of War and Peace," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 14(1), pages 77-113, February.
    5. Winkler, Adalbert, 2001. "On the need for an international lender of last resort: Lessons from domestic financial markets," W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers 28, University of Würzburg, Department of Economics.
    6. Kyle Beardsley & Victor Asal, 2009. "Nuclear Weapons as Shields," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(3), pages 235-255, July.
    7. Mikhail Chernov & Brett R. Dunn & Francis A. Longstaff, 2018. "Macroeconomic-Driven Prepayment Risk and the Valuation of Mortgage-Backed Securities," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(3), pages 1132-1183.
    8. Kevin A. Clarke, 2005. "The Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Econometric Research," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(4), pages 341-352, September.
    9. Judy L Klein, 2015. "The Cold War Hot House for Modeling Strategies at the Carnegie Institute of Technology," Working Papers Series 19, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    10. Serdar Ş. Güner, 2004. "Aegean Territorial Waters Conflict: An Evolutionary Narrative," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(4), pages 297-312, September.
    11. Gulino, Salvatore, 2012. "Obsolescence Of The 30-Year Mortgage," MPRA Paper 55354, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Brock F. Tessman & Steve Chan, 2004. "Power Cycles, Risk Propensity, and Great-Power Deterrence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(2), pages 131-153, April.
    13. David L. Rousseau, 2002. "Motivations for Choice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(3), pages 394-426, June.
    14. Juan-Manuel Renero, 2000. "May the Worst Commodity Standard be the Best? A Re-enactment of "The Crimes of 1873"," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1522, Econometric Society.
    15. T. Clifton Morgan & Glenn Palmer, 2000. "A Model of Foreign Policy Substitutability," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 44(1), pages 11-32, February.
    16. Michael J. Ireland & Scott Sigmund Gartner, 2001. "Time to Fight," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 45(5), pages 547-568, October.
    17. Gregory A. Raymond, 1994. "Democracies, Disputes, and Third-Party Intermediaries," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(1), pages 24-42, March.
    18. D. Scott Bennett & Allan C. Stam, 2000. "Research Design and Estimator Choices in the Analysis of Interstate Dyads," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 44(5), pages 653-685, October.
    19. Gerald L. Sorokin, 1996. "The Role of Rewards in Conflictual International Interactions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(4), pages 658-677, December.
    20. Kevin A. Clarke & Curtis S. Signorino, 2010. "Discriminating Methods: Tests for Non‐nested Discrete Choice Models," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(2), pages 368-388, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:16:y:1998:i:2:p:125-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.