IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v587y2003i1p6-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preface

Author

Listed:
  • David Weisburd
  • Anthony Petrosino
  • Cynthia M. Lum

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • David Weisburd & Anthony Petrosino & Cynthia M. Lum, 2003. "Preface," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 6-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:587:y:2003:i:1:p:6-14
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716202250882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716202250882
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716202250882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Petrosino & Robert F. Boruch & Haluk Soydan & Lorna Duggan & Julio Sanchez-Meca, 2001. "Meeting the Challenges of Evidence-Based Policy: The Campbell Collaboration," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 578(1), pages 14-34, November.
    2. David P. Farrington & Anthony Petrosino, 2001. "The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 578(1), pages 35-49, November.
    3. Sandra M. Nutley & Huw T.O. Davies, 1999. "The Fall and Rise of Evidence in Criminal Justice," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 47-54, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David P. Farrington, 2003. "Methodological Quality Standards for Evaluation Research," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 49-68, May.
    2. Rebecca A. Maynard, 2018. "The Role of Federal Agencies in Creating and Administering Evidence-Based Policies," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 678(1), pages 134-144, July.
    3. David B. Wilson, 2001. "Meta-Analytic Methods for Criminology," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 578(1), pages 71-89, November.
    4. Lenart-Gansiniec Regina, 2022. "The dilemmas of systematic literature review: the context of crowdsourcing in science," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 58(1), pages 11-21, March.
    5. David P. Farrington, 2003. "British Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 589(1), pages 150-167, September.
    6. David Weisburd & Cynthia M. Lum & Sue-Ming Yang, 2003. "When can we Conclude that Treatments or Programs “Don’t Work†?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 31-48, May.
    7. Cynthia Lum & Leslie W. Kennedy & Alison J. Sherley, 2006. "The Effectiveness of Counter‐Terrorism Strategies," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 1-50.
    8. Brandon C. Welsh & David P. Farrington, 2001. "Toward an Evidence-Based Approach to Preventing Crime," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 578(1), pages 158-173, November.
    9. David Weisburd & Cynthia M. Lum & Anthony Petrosino, 2001. "Does Research Design Affect Study Outcomes in Criminal Justice?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 578(1), pages 50-70, November.
    10. Joan McCord, 2003. "Cures That Harm: Unanticipated Outcomes of Crime Prevention Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 16-30, May.
    11. Anthony Petrosino & Robert F. Boruch & Haluk Soydan & Lorna Duggan & Julio Sanchez-Meca, 2001. "Meeting the Challenges of Evidence-Based Policy: The Campbell Collaboration," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 578(1), pages 14-34, November.
    12. Muhammad Fadhlullah Abu Bakar & Shuhairy Norhisham & Herda Yati Katman & Chow Ming Fai & Nor Najwa Irina Mohd Azlan & Nur Sarah Shaziah Samsudin, 2022. "Service Quality of Bus Performance in Asia: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Hui Foh Foong & Sook Yee Lim & Fakhrul Zaman Rokhani & Mohamad Fazdillah Bagat & Siti Farra Zillah Abdullah & Tengku Aizan Hamid & Siti Anom Ahmad, 2022. "For Better or for Worse? A Scoping Review of the Relationship between Internet Use and Mental Health in Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:587:y:2003:i:1:p:6-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.