IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rss/jnljms/v7i4p2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixed Approach Pros And Cons of Positivism and Alternativism:Towards The Perfection of Science Development

Author

Listed:
  • Dian Indri Purnamasari

Abstract

We discuss the following questions: “Which one of these approaches is the best, and is it possible that the two schools of thought be "united" for the perfection of science development?†In accounting methodology or in any particular study, it is better that the use of both approaches were left to their respective researchers in discussing a topic, without criticizing each other and claim that one approach is better than the other. The two may complement and refine each other’s topics studied in depth from different perspectives. Thus, it is expected that the development of science will lead to perfection with the development of various approaches used.

Suggested Citation

  • Dian Indri Purnamasari, 2016. "Mixed Approach Pros And Cons of Positivism and Alternativism:Towards The Perfection of Science Development," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 188-194.
    • Handle: RePEc:rss:jnljms:v7i4p2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rassweb.org/admin/pages/ResearchPapers/Paper%202_1497446483.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tinker, Anthony M. & Merino, Barbara D. & Neimark, Marilyn Dale, 1982. "The normative origins of positive theories: Ideology and accounting thought," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 167-200, April.
    2. Holthausen, Robert W. & Leftwich, Richard W., 1983. "The economic consequences of accounting choice implications of costly contracting and monitoring," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 77-117, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    2. Lawrence A. Boland & Irene M. Gordon, 1992. "Criticizing positive accounting theory," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 142-170, September.
    3. Ding, Yuan & Richard, Jacques & Stolowy, Hervé, 2008. "Towards an understanding of the phases of goodwill accounting in four Western capitalist countries: From stakeholder model to shareholder model," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 718-755.
    4. Philip W. Bell, 1987. "Accounting as a discipline for study and practice: 1986," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 338-367, March.
    5. James, Kieran, 2008. "A Critical Theory perspective on the pressures, contradictions and dilemmas faced by entry-level accounting academics," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(8), pages 1263-1295.
    6. Brown, Lawrence D., 1996. "Influential accounting articles, individuals, Ph.D. granting institutions and faculties: A citational analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(7-8), pages 723-754.
    7. Rã‰Al Labelle, 1990. "Bond covenants and changes in accounting policy: Canadian evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 677-698, March.
    8. Hand, John R. M. & Skantz, Terrance R., 1997. "The economic determinants of accounting choices: The unique case of equity carve-outs under SAB 51," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 175-203, December.
    9. Barrett, Michael & Cooper, David J. & Jamal, Karim, 2005. "Globalization and the coordinating of work in multinational audits," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Ravenscroft, Sue & Williams, Paul F., 2009. "Making imaginary worlds real: The case of expensing employee stock options," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 770-786, August.
    11. Iatridis, George & Valahi, Styliani, 2010. "Voluntary IAS 1 accounting disclosures prior to official IAS adoption: An empirical investigation of UK firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    13. Merz, Alexander, 2017. "What have we learned from SFAS 123r and IFRS 2? A review of existing evidence and future research suggestions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 14-33.
    14. Pankaj Baag, 2014. "Exploring The Relation Between Promoter’S Contribution And Resubmitted Approved Loan Proposal In The Indian Banks At The Loan Inception Stage," Working papers 154, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    15. Strausz, Roland, 2006. "Timing of verification procedures: Monitoring versus auditing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 89-107, January.
    16. Emmanuel Mensah & Christopher Boachie, 2023. "Corporate governance mechanisms and earnings management: The moderating role of female directors," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2167290-216, December.
    17. James Linck & Thomas Lopez & Lynn Rees, 2007. "The valuation consequences of voluntary accounting changes," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 327-352, May.
    18. Alayemi, Sunday Adebayo & Morohunfola Olasunkanmi Abdul-Lateef, 2017. "Accounting Numbers and Management’s Financial Reporting Incentives: Evidence from Positive Accounting Theory," Noble International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 2(2), pages 50-53, February.
    19. Toms, J. S., 2002. "The rise of modern accounting and the fall of the public company: the Lancashire cotton mills 1870-1914," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1-2), pages 61-84.
    20. Paul Klumpes, 2000. "Incentives and disincentives for voluntary disclosure by pension funds: international evidence," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 287-298.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rss:jnljms:v7i4p2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danish Khalil (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rassweb.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.