IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/supplm/v64y2016i8p37-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Analysis of Investment’s Sensitivity

Author

Listed:
  • Radu Titus MARINESCU

    (Universitatea „ARTIFEX” din Bucuresti)

  • Madalina Gabriela ANGHEL

    (Universitatea „ARTIFEX” din Bucuresti)

  • Aurelian DIACONU

    (Universitatea „ARTIFEX” din Bucuresti)

Abstract

In performing the analysis of an investment, an important role is played by the sensitivity degree of the project, at the investments’ design, we must take the uncertainty (risk) level into account, also the recovery mode for expenses involved etc. the impact study for an investment must take into account the also the efficiency of the project for the economic environment, and also the consequences regarding its social effect. A project is based on a series of random variables, which must be identified and included in the realized study. From the theoretical viewpoint, it also manifests the perspective of occurrence of some issues during the investment’s development. In this way, the simplest method of analysis is represented by sensitivity, which consists in the analysis of all elements that determine the value of the project, the estimation of the investment’s effect variation. The analysis must be performed in an optimistic, but also pessimistic sense, in order to identify, control and eventually reduce the risks that can occur during the investment process. In this order, we have focused on the sensitivity analysis and we have used the scenarios technique. The theoretical models identified were analysed also practically, in order to suggest essential elements that must be taken into account. The data used in the validation of the identified models were sometimes adjusted by the authors.

Suggested Citation

  • Radu Titus MARINESCU & Madalina Gabriela ANGHEL & Aurelian DIACONU, 2016. "Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Analysis of Investment’s Sensitivity," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(8), pages 37-47, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:64:y:2016:i:8:p:37-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/supliment/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/RRSS_08_2016_A3_en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm Baker & Ryan Taliaferro & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2006. "Predicting Returns with Managerial Decision Variables: Is There a Small‐Sample Bias?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(4), pages 1711-1730, August.
    2. John A. Doukas & Chansog (Francis) Kim & Christos Pantzalis, 2008. "Do Analysts Influence Corporate Financing and Investment?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 37(2), pages 303-339, June.
    3. Marek Popielas, 2012. "Harmonization Of Investment Services In The European Union - The Example Of Investment Funds," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 3(1), pages 73-88, March.
    4. Edward Herbst & Frank Schorfheide, 2014. "Sequential Monte Carlo Sampling For Dsge Models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(7), pages 1073-1098, November.
    5. Adriano A. Rampini & S. Viswanathan, 2010. "Collateral, Risk Management, and the Distribution of Debt Capacity," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(6), pages 2293-2322, December.
    6. Olga B. Kalaman & Olga O. Zhalinska, 2012. "Venture capital as a major source of investment in innovation," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 1(1), pages 92-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Marius POPOVICI, 2017. "Financial market analysis models," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(6), pages 174-183, June.
    2. Matthias Efing & Harald Hau & Patrick Kampkktter & Jean-Charles Rochet, 2018. "Bank Bonus Pay as a Risk Sharing Contract," Working Papers hal-01847442, HAL.
    3. Arnaud Dufays, 2016. "Evolutionary Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers for Change-Point Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-33, March.
    4. Azamat Abdymomunov & Atanas Mihov, 2019. "Operational Risk and Risk Management Quality: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 56(1), pages 73-93, August.
    5. Bustos, Emil, 2023. "The Effect of Financial Constraints on Inventory Holdings," Working Paper Series 1463, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    6. Andrés Fioriti & Allan Hernandez-Chanto, 2022. "Leveling the Playing Field for Risk-Averse Agents in Security-Bid Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5441-5463, July.
    7. Shawn Cole & Xavier Gine & Jeremy Tobacman & Petia Topalova & Robert Townsend & James Vickery, 2013. "Barriers to Household Risk Management: Evidence from India," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 104-135, January.
    8. Calvet, Laurent E. & Czellar, Veronika, 2015. "Through the looking glass: Indirect inference via simple equilibria," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 343-358.
    9. Heitor Almeida & Murillo Campello & Igor Cunha & Michael S. Weisbach, 2014. "Corporate Liquidity Management: A Conceptual Framework and Survey," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 135-162, December.
    10. To, Thomas Y. & Navone, Marco & Wu, Eliza, 2018. "Analyst coverage and the quality of corporate investment decisions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 164-181.
    11. Gregor Boehl & Gavin Goy & Felix Strobel, 2020. "A Structural Investigation of Quantitative Easing," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_193, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    12. Johannes F. Wieland & Mu‐Jeung Yang, 2020. "Financial Dampening," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 52(1), pages 79-113, February.
    13. Mélise Jaud & Madina Kukenova & Martin Strieborny, 2009. "Financial dependence and intensive margin of trade," PSE Working Papers halshs-00575005, HAL.
    14. Roberts, Michael R., 2015. "The role of dynamic renegotiation and asymmetric information in financial contracting," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 61-81.
    15. Bolton, Patrick & Wang, Neng & Yang, Jinqiang, 2019. "Investment under uncertainty with financial constraints," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Shibata, Takashi & Nishihara, Michi, 2018. "Investment timing, reversibility, and financing constraints," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 771-796.
    17. Benjamin L. Collier & Andrew F. Haughwout & Howard C. Kunreuther & Erwann O. Michel‐Kerjan, 2020. "Firms’ Management of Infrequent Shocks," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 52(6), pages 1329-1359, September.
    18. Schroth, Josef, 2021. "Macroprudential policy with capital buffers," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 296-311.
    19. Josef Schroth, 2012. "Financial Crisis Resolution," Staff Working Papers 12-42, Bank of Canada.
    20. Efraim Benmelech & Nitish Kumar & Raghuram Rajan, 2020. "The Decline of Secured Debt," NBER Working Papers 26637, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:64:y:2016:i:8:p:37-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.