IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mrpase/v13y2021i1p17-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geopolitics And Multicultural Environment As The Determinants Of Personnel Security

Author

Listed:
  • Wadim STRIELKOWSKI

    (Cambridge Institute for Advanced Studies, 23 King Street, CB1 1AH Cambridge, UK And Department of Trade and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jose NIÑO-AMÉZQUITA

    (Regional Research Centre for Competiveness and Innovation of BoyacA (CRePIB), Av. Calle 147 # 19-79 Torre B Ap 402, Bogota, Colombia)

  • Svetlana KALYUGINA

    (North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkin str.1, Stavropol 355009, Russian Federation)

Abstract

Ther paper studies the impacts of geopolitics and polycultural environment that constitute the key determinants for the personnel securuity. We focus on a specific case study of Russian Federation where the geopolitical factors and multiculturalism have a significant reprecussion on human resources (similar to other former Communist countries). Factors such as the mobility and quality of human resources, internal and international migration, or even a brain drain involving highly skilled professionals are associated with profound institutional changes that are taking place in Russian Federation. Moreover, the safety of personnel is closely linked to national security, which makes it extremely important. Nowadays, modern conflicts and waged with information and knowledge rather than with weapons and highly-skilled human resources become the most important element of protecting national interests and polical dominance within the entangled web of the world’s complex geopolitics. The paper is devoted to assessing the specifics of personnel security and safety in Russia in the context of globalization and the country’s geopolitical plans and ambitions. We identify the factors affecting personnel security in the country and provide recommendations for improving it. In addition, we discuss a number of relevant and valuable recommendations regarding the justification of the directions of personnel policy and human resource management within the framework of the national security in the globalized multi-tier world.

Suggested Citation

  • Wadim STRIELKOWSKI & Jose NIÑO-AMÉZQUITA & Svetlana KALYUGINA, 2021. "Geopolitics And Multicultural Environment As The Determinants Of Personnel Security," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 17-31, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:17-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mrp.ase.ro/no131/f2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olga Yurievna Voronkova & Veronika Yankovskaya & Irina Kovaleva & Ilya Epishkin & Iuliana Iusupova & Yuliya Berdova, 2019. "Sustainable territorial development based on the effective use of resource potential," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 662-673, September.
    2. Marco Siddi, 2018. "The Role of Power in EU–Russia Energy Relations: The Interplay between Markets and Geopolitics," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(10), pages 1552-1571, November.
    3. Ehsan Rasoulinezhad & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary & Jinsok Sung & Nisit Panthamit, 2020. "Geopolitical Risk and Energy Transition in Russia: Evidence from ARDL Bounds Testing Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wadim Strielkowski & Anna Sherstobitova & Patrik Rovny & Tatiana Evteeva, 2021. "Increasing Energy Efficiency and Modernization of Energy Systems in Russia: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. N.S. Plaskova & N.A. Prodanova & V.A. Dikikh & V.E. Kerimov & I.P. Kurochkina & E.V. Prokofieva, 2020. "Principles of Forming a Modern Accounting and Analytical Model of Commercial Organization in Digital Economy," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 203-214.
    3. Riti, Joshua Sunday & Shu, Yang & Riti, Miriam-Kamah J., 2022. "Geopolitical risk and environmental degradation in BRICS: Aggregation bias and policy inference," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Seyi Saint Akadiri & Joshua Sunday Riti & Ada Tony Odu, 2023. "Interaction among geopolitical risk, trade openness, economic growth, carbon emissions and Its implication on climate change in india," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1305-1326, August.
    5. Cebotari Livia, 2022. "EU-Russia energy relations: problems and perspectives," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 1001-1014, August.
    6. Denis A. Lavrov & Svetlana V. Karpova & Vladimir I. Avdiyskiy & Svetlana E. Dubova & Svetlana V. Makar & Natalia A. Barmenkova & Nataliya A. Kazakova & Nikolay P. Kushchev, 2021. "Green Electricity and Heat Generation in Canada: Implications for Russia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 280-289.
    7. Romanova, Tatiana, 2021. "Russia's political discourse on the EU’s energy transition (2014–2019) and its effect on EU-Russia energy relations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Sohag, Kazi & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Elsayed, Ahmed H. & Mariev, Oleg & Safonova, Yulia, 2022. "Do geopolitical events transmit opportunity or threat to green markets? Decomposed measures of geopolitical risks," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Muhammad Khalid Anser & Qasim Raza Syed & Hooi Hooi Lean & Andrew Adewale Alola & Munir Ahmad, 2021. "Do Economic Policy Uncertainty and Geopolitical Risk Lead to Environmental Degradation? Evidence from Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Cui, Lianbiao & Yue, Suyun & Nghiem, Xuan-Hoa & Duan, Mei, 2023. "Exploring the risk and economic vulnerability of global energy supply chain interruption in the context of Russo-Ukrainian war," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Mohd Ziaur Rehman & Shabeer Khan & Uzair Abdullah Khan & Wadi B. Alonazi & Abul Ala Noman, 2023. "How Do Global Uncertainties Spillovers Affect Leading Renewable Energy Indices? Evidence from the Network Connectedness Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Floros Flouros & Victoria Pistikou & Vasilios Plakandaras, 2022. "Geopolitical Risk as a Determinant of Renewable Energy Investments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Fen Li & Zhehao Huang & Junhao Zhong & Khaldoon Albitar, 2020. "Do Tense Geopolitical Factors Drive Crude Oil Prices?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Wang, Kai-Hua & Wen, Cui-Ping & Liu, Hong-Wen & Liu, Lu, 2023. "Promotion or hindrance? Exploring the bidirectional causality between geopolitical risk and green bonds from an energy perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    15. Su, Chi-Wei & Khan, Khalid & Umar, Muhammad & Zhang, Weike, 2021. "Does renewable energy redefine geopolitical risks?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Osama D. Sweidan, 2023. "The Effect of Geopolitical Risk on Income Inequality: Evidence from a Panel Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 47-66, June.
    17. Kai-Hua Wang & Jia-Min Kan & Cui-Feng Jiang & Chi-Wei Su, 2022. "Is Geopolitical Risk Powerful Enough to Affect Carbon Dioxide Emissions? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Li, Yurog & Cong, Zhenglong & Xie, Yufan & Wang, Yan & Wang, Hongmei, 2022. "The relationship between green finance, economic factors, geopolitical risk and natural resources commodity prices: Evidence from five most natural resources holding countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Dalilis Escobar Rivera & Maria Rosa Terradellas Piferrer & Maria Helena Benito Mundet, 2021. "Measuring Territorial Social Responsibility and Sustainability Using the EFQM Excellence Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Yinhui Wang & Yugang He, 2023. "Does Information and Communication Technology Trade Openness Matter for China’s Energy Transformation and Environmental Quality?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:17-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.