Incentive Contracting for National Defense: A Problem of Optimal Risk Sharing
AbstractThis paper analyzes risk sharing in defense contracting within an insurance framework with moral hazard present. The positive model specifies conditions under which risk sharing between the firm and the government can be expected to occur, and identifies the important exogenous characteristics of the firm that determine the equilibrium set of contract terms. An important public policy implication is derived from a normative comparison between the simple incentive structure currently used in defense contracting and a modified contingent claims arrangement. The latter is shown to be superior in providing desirable risk sharing, while also maintaining appropriate marginal incentives for cost control.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by The RAND Corporation in its journal Bell Journal of Economics.
Volume (Year): 8 (1977)
Issue (Month): 1 (Spring)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.rje.org
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- David Pérez-Castrillo & Nicolas Riedinger, 1999.
"Auditing Cost Overrun Claims,"
CIE Discussion Papers
1999-12, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics.
- Dieter Bös, 1996. "Incomplete Contracting and Target-Cost Pricing," Discussion Paper Serie A 524, University of Bonn, Germany.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.