IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/spppps/0221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local spatial policy in Ukraine and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Nowak, Maciej J.

    (West Pomeranian University of Technology)

  • Lozynskyy, Roman M.

    (Ivan Franko National University of Lviv)

  • Pantyley, Viktoriya

    (Maria Curie-Skłodowska University)

Abstract

The article aims to compare the local tools of Ukrainian and Polish spatial policy. It includes legal solutions (with a particular emphasis on the basics of development restrictions) and problems related to their application diagnosed in the literature on the subject. Based on the analysis of the spatial management systems of both countries, the similarities and differences were determined, referring them to the international discussion and suggesting directions for further research (on the spatial management systems of Central and Eastern European countries). Ukraine and Poland were selected for analysis in terms of similarities (partially similar historical conditions, location) and differences (status of a European Union Member State, spatial planning traditions).

Suggested Citation

  • Nowak, Maciej J. & Lozynskyy, Roman M. & Pantyley, Viktoriya, 2021. "Local spatial policy in Ukraine and Poland," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/KSzPP/article/view/2783
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: azybal@sgh.waw.pl
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Reimer & Hans Blotevogel, 2012. "Comparing Spatial Planning Practice in Europe: A Plea for Cultural Sensitization," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 7-24.
    2. Vincent Nadin, 2012. "International Comparative Planning Methodology: Introduction to the Theme Issue," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 1-5.
    3. Umberto Janin Rivolin & Andreas Faludi, 2005. "The hidden face of European spatial planning: innovations in governance," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 195-215, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maciej Nowak & Viktoriya Pantyley & Małgorzata Blaszke & Liudmila Fakeyeva & Roman Lozynskyy & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, 2023. "Spatial Planning at the National Level: Comparison of Legal and Strategic Instruments in a Case Study of Belarus, Ukraine, and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Maciej J. Nowak & Agnieszka Brelik & Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel & Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka & Justyna Przedańska, 2023. "Spatial Conflicts concerning Wind Power Plants—A Case Study of Spatial Plans in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Andrei Mitrea & Krisztina Filepné Kovács & Gunta Lukstina & Evelin Jürgenson & Zuzana Ladzianska & Velislava Simeonova & Roman Lozynskyy & Vit Rezac & Viktori, 2022. "The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Spatial Planning Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suškevičs, M. & Eiter, S. & Martinat, S. & Stober, D. & Vollmer, E. & de Boer, C.L. & Buchecker, M., 2019. "Regional variation in public acceptance of wind energy development in Europe: What are the roles of planning procedures and participation?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 311-323.
    2. Kristina Grange, 2014. "In Search of Radical Democracy: The Ideological Character of Current Political Advocacies for Culture Change in Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2670-2685, November.
    3. Przemysław Śleszyński & Maciej Nowak & Paweł Sudra & Magdalena Załęczna & Małgorzata Blaszke, 2021. "Economic Consequences of Adopting Local Spatial Development Plans for the Spatial Management System: The Case of Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Mario Reimer, 2013. "Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Levin-Keitel, Meike & Sondermann, Martin, 2014. "Planerische Instrumente in lokalen Kontexten: Einblicke in die Vielfalt von Planungskulturen," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 172-191, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    6. Salvati, Luca & Sateriano, Adele & Grigoriadis, Efstathios & Carlucci, Margherita, 2017. "New wine in old bottles: The (changing) socioeconomic attributes of sprawl during building boom and stagnation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 361-372.
    7. Paola Gazzola, 2008. "What Appears To Make Sea Effective In Different Planning Systems," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(01), pages 1-24.
    8. Jussi S Jauhiainen & Helka Moilanen, 2011. "Towards Fluid Territories in European Spatial Development: Regional Development Zones in Finland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(4), pages 728-744, August.
    9. Stein Axel, 2010. "Territorial Cohesion in the Context of Interregional and Transnational Cooperation," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 5-22, June.
    10. Živanović, Zora & Tošić, Branka & Berisha, Erblin & Perić, Ana, 2023. "An attempt to locate the Russian spatial planning system within the European planning families," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. Maciej Nowak & Giancarlo Cotella & Przemysław Śleszyński, 2021. "The Legal, Administrative, and Governance Frameworks of Spatial Policy, Planning, and Land Use: Interdependencies, Barriers, and Directions of Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-9, October.
    12. Lanfredi, Maria & Egidi, Gianluca & Bianchini, Leonardo & Salvati, Luca, 2022. "One size does not fit all: A tale of polycentric development and land degradation in Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Andreas Faludi, 2008. "The Learning Machine: European Integration in the Planning Mirror," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(6), pages 1470-1484, June.
    14. Hamedinger Alexander, 2014. "The Mobility and/or Fixity of Urban and Planning Policies – The Role of Divergent Urban Planning Cultures," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Suitner Johannes, 2014. "Cultures of Image Construction Approaching Planning Cultures as a Factor in Urban Image Production," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Frank Othengrafen & Mario Reimer, 2013. "The Embeddedness of Planning in Cultural Contexts: Theoretical Foundations for the Analysis of Dynamic Planning Cultures," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1269-1284, June.
    17. Marcin DÄ…browski, 2014. "Towards place-based regional and local development strategies in Central and Eastern Europe? EU cohesion policy and strategic planning capacity at the sub-national level," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(4-5), pages 378-393, June.
    18. Luca Salvati, 2014. "Towards a Polycentric Region? The Socio-economic Trajectory of Rome, an ‘Eternally Mediterranean’ City," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(3), pages 268-284, July.
    19. Marjolein Spaans, 2005. "Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England," ERSA conference papers ersa05p235, European Regional Science Association.
    20. Popović, Svetislav G. & Dobričić, Milica & Savić, Sanja Vlahović, 2021. "Challenges of sustainable spatial development in the light of new international perspectives - The case of Montenegro," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    spatial management systems; local spatial development plans; comparisons;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K49 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Other
    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcin Ochalski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.