IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/spppps/0182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Znaczenie konsultacji społecznych w formułowaniu polityki publicznej Unii Europejskiej

Author

Listed:
  • Kurczewska, Urszula

    (Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społeczne, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)

Abstract

W procesie formułowania polityki publicznej Unii Europejskiej istotną rolę odgrywają mechanizmy deliberatywne, które mają rekompensować niedostatek demokracji przedstawicielskiej. Jednym z nich są konsultacje społeczne prowadzone głównie przez Komisję Europejską. Artykuł zawiera analizę roli otwartych konsultacji publicznych w programowaniu i realizacji unijnej polityki sektorowej. Wyraźnie widoczny jest wzrost ich znaczenia i częstość stosowania w odniesieniu do różnych rodzajów polityki gospodarczej. Konsultacje pełnią różne funkcje, przede wszystkim służą jako instrument legitymizacji podejmowanych przez Komisję decyzji oraz jako ważne źródło informacji o opiniach i stanowiskach interesariuszy. Szczegółowo analizowany jest wypadek konsultacji społecznych dotyczących umowy transatlantyckiej TTIP ze względu na jej wagę dla wszystkich Europejczyków oraz masowe protesty społeczne, które już występowały i mogą również mieć miejsce w przyszłości.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurczewska, Urszula, 2015. "Znaczenie konsultacji społecznych w formułowaniu polityki publicznej Unii Europejskiej," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/KSzPP/article/view/616
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: azybal@sgh.waw.pl
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pieter Bouwen, 2004. "The Logic of Access to the European Parliament: Business Lobbying in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 473-495, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Barron & Peter Hultén, 2011. "Corporate Political Strategizing in the European Union during the 2007–10 Recession: An Exploratory Study," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 783-801, October.
    2. Scott L. Greer & Elize Massard da Fonseca & Christopher Adolph, 2008. "Mobilizing Bias in Europe," European Union Politics, , vol. 9(3), pages 403-433, September.
    3. Gullberg, Anne Therese, 2008. "Lobbying friends and foes in climate policy: The case of business and environmental interest groups in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2954-2962, August.
    4. Massaro, Maria, 2019. "Is business lobbying in the European Union context-dependent? Evidence from the policy field of radio spectrum," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10).
    5. David Marshall, 2015. "Explaining Interest Group Interactions with Party Group Members in the European Parliament: Dominant Party Groups and Coalition Formation," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 311-329, March.
    6. Åse Gornitzka & Cathrine Holst, 2015. "The Expert-Executive Nexus in the EU: An Introduction," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-12.
    7. Steffen Hurka, 2013. "Changing the output: The logic of amendment success in the European Parliament’s ENVI Committee," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(2), pages 273-296, June.
    8. Åse Gornitzka & Ulf Sverdrup, 2015. "Societal Inclusion in Expert Venues: Participation of Interest Groups and Business in the European Commission Expert Groups," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 151-165.
    9. Niemann, Arne, 2011. "Conceptualising Commom Commercial Policy Treaty revision: explaining stagnancy and dynamics from the Amsterdam IGC to the Treaty of Lisbon," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 15, October.
    10. Adam W. Chalmers, 2020. "Unity and conflict: Explaining financial industry lobbying success in European Union public consultations," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 391-408, July.
    11. Adam W Chalmers, 2013. "With a lot of help from their friends: Explaining the social logic of informational lobbying in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(4), pages 475-496, December.
    12. Petrus Kautto, 2009. "Nokia as an Environmental Policy Actor: Evolution of Collaborative Corporate Political Activity in a Multinational Company," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 103-125, January.
    13. Arne Niemann, 2006. "Explaining visa, asylum and immigration policy Treaty revision: insights from a revised neofunctionalist framework," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0005, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    14. David Marshall, 2010. "Who to lobby and when: Institutional determinants of interest group strategies in European Parliament committees," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(4), pages 553-575, December.
    15. Anne Gullberg, 2008. "Rational lobbying and EU climate policy," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 161-178, June.
    16. Petrus Kautto, 2009. "Nokia as an Environmental Policy Actor: Evolution of Collaborative Corporate Political Activity in a Multinational Company," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 103-125, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    konsultacje społeczne; polityka publiczna; deliberacja; Komisja Europejska; interesariusze; dialog obywatelski; umowa TTIP;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcin Ochalski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.