IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v6y2017i5p55-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing Tax Avoidance by Using Conservatism Accounting Through Book Tax Differences:Case Study in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Heni Purwantini

    (Institute of Economic Science of Jaya Negara Malang,Indonesia)

Abstract

The research’s first purpose is to analyze directly conservatism accounting influence towards book tax differences and tax avoidance. The second purpose is to analyse indirect influence towards tax avoidance through book tax differences. The research is conducted to companies enlisted in Indonesian Stock Exchange and belongs to LQ45 during 2013 to 2015. The number of companies sample taken by purposive sampling is 23 corporations, therefore total observation is 69 observations. The acquired data analysed by path analysis. This research conclude that conservatism accounting practice significantly influence book tax difference practice but did not influence tax avoidance. Conservatism accounting practice is also having no influence towards tax avoidance committed by book tax differences. This book tax difference is only significantly influential to commit tax avoidance. This research can contribute in taxation field as input in tax planning formulation. Key Words:Book Tax Differences, Conservatism, Accounting, Corporations, Path Analysis, Indonesian Stock Exchange

Suggested Citation

  • Heni Purwantini, 2017. "Minimizing Tax Avoidance by Using Conservatism Accounting Through Book Tax Differences:Case Study in Indonesia," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 6(5), pages 55-67, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:6:y:2017:i:5:p:55-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/62/64
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/62
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Plesko, George A., 2004. "Corporate Tax Avoidance and the Properties of Corporate Earnings," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 57(3), pages 729-737, September.
    2. Maurizio Bovi, 2005. "Book-Tax Gap. An Income Horse Race," Public Economics 0506009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Abdul Wahab, Nor Shaipah & Holland, Kevin, 2015. "The persistence of book-tax differences," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 339-350.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joshua Aronmwan, Edosa & Okafor, Chinwuba, 2019. "Corporate Tax Avoidance: Review Of Measures And Prospects," International Journal of Contemporary Accounting Issues-IJCAI (formerly International Journal of Accounting & Finance IJAF), The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), vol. 8(2), pages 21-42, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heni PURWANTINI & Grahita CHANDRARIN & Prihat ASSIH, 2017. "Minimizing Tax Avoidance by Using Conservatism Accounting through Book Tax Differences. Case Study in Indonesia," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 140-147.
    2. Luca Menicacci, 2022. "Financial reporting and book-tax conformity: A review of the issues," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 41-77.
    3. Anna Görlitz & Michael Dobler, 2023. "Financial accounting for deferred taxes: a systematic review of empirical evidence," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 113-165, February.
    4. Luo, Bing, 2019. "Effects of auditor-provided tax services on book-tax differences and on investors' mispricing of book-tax differences," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    5. Wiem Dridi & Boubaker Adel, 2016. "Book-Tax Differences and the Persistence of Earnings and Accruals: Tunisian Evidence," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 193-193, June.
    6. Hanlon, Michelle & Laplante, Stacie Kelley & Shevlin, Terry, 2005. "Evidence for the Possible Information Loss of Conforming Book Income and Taxable Income," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(2), pages 407-442, October.
    7. Poterba, James M. & Rao, Nirupama S. & Seidman, Jeri K., 2011. "Deferred Tax Positions and Incentives for Corporate Behavior Around Corporate Tax Changes," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 64(1), pages 27-57, March.
    8. Konda, Laura & Patel, Elena & Seegert, Nathan, 2022. "Tax enforcement and the intended and unintended consequences of information disclosure," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Edward L. Maydew & Douglas A. Shackelford, 2005. "The Changing Role of Auditors in Corporate Tax Planning," NBER Working Papers 11504, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Utkir Kholbadalov, 2012. "The relationship of corporate tax avoidance, cost of debt and institutional ownership: evidence from Malaysia," Economic Analysis Working Papers (2002-2010). Atlantic Review of Economics (2011-2016), Colexio de Economistas de A Coruña, Spain and Fundación Una Galicia Moderna, vol. 2, pages 1-1, December.
    11. Jennie Cho & Jilnaught Wong & Norman Wong, 2006. "Book‐Tax Differences and Inland Revenue Audit Adjustments in New Zealand," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9‐10), pages 1650-1667, November.
    12. Petr Habanec & Hana Bohušová, 2017. "Comparison of Deferred Tax Materiality Reporting in Accordance with Continental and Anglo-Saxon Reporting System," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(6), pages 1917-1924.
    13. Wei Huang & Tingting Ying & Yun Shen, 2018. "Executive cash compensation and tax aggressiveness of Chinese firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1151-1180, November.
    14. Chyz, James A., 2013. "Personally tax aggressive executives and corporate tax sheltering," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 311-328.
    15. Savka VUCKOVIC-MILUTINOVIC & Radojko LUKIC, 2013. "Analysis of Deferred Taxes in the Business Environment in Serbia," Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 25-37, June.
    16. Abdul Wahab, Nor Shaipah & Ntim, Collins G. & Mohd Adnan, Mohd Muttaqin & Tye, Wei Ling, 2018. "Top management team heterogeneity, governance changes and book-tax differences," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 30-46.
    17. Irwan & Etty Murwaningsari, 2021. "Factors Affecting Book-Tax Differences in Indonesian Manufacturing Industries," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 21-28.
    18. James A. Chyz & Fabio B. Gaertner & Asad Kausar & Luke Watson, 2019. "Overconfidence and Corporate Tax Policy," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1114-1145, September.
    19. Joshua Aronmwan, Edosa & Okafor, Chinwuba, 2019. "Corporate Tax Avoidance: Review Of Measures And Prospects," International Journal of Contemporary Accounting Issues-IJCAI (formerly International Journal of Accounting & Finance IJAF), The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), vol. 8(2), pages 21-42, September.
    20. Epps, Kathryn K. & Catherine Cleaveland, M., 2009. "Insiders’ perspectives of the effects of recent regulation on corporate taxation," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 34-47.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:6:y:2017:i:5:p:55-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.