IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v15y2020i1p46-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rejoinder To Nelson On Nature Preserves

Author

Listed:
  • Walter E. BLOCK

    (Loyola University New Orleans)

  • Michael R. EDELSTEIN

Abstract

One of the most difficult challenges facing free market advocates of homesteading as the foundation of private property rights is the nature preserve. Homesteading requires the mixing of labor with land in order to turn it into private property. But pristine nature preserves are lands with which no human labor has ever interacted. It would appear then that in the free society there could be no such thing as a pristine nature preserve. Block and Edelstein (2012) found a way out of this quandary. In the view of Nelson (2019), these two authors failed in this self-appointed task of theirs. The present paper is an attempt to defend the former against the criticisms of the latter

Suggested Citation

  • Walter E. BLOCK & Michael R. EDELSTEIN, 2020. "Rejoinder To Nelson On Nature Preserves," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 15(1), pages 46-56, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:46-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/SP20/REBE-SP20-A4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William N. Butos & Roger G. Koppl, 1995. "The Varieties of Subjectivism: Keynes and Hayek on Expectations," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 9505001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 May 1995.
    2. Makovi, Michael, 2015. "The "Self-Defeating Morality" of the Lockean Proviso," MPRA Paper 65621, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Walter E. Block & Michael R. Edelstein, 2012. "Popsicle Sticks And Homesteading Land For Nature Preserves," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 7(1), pages 7-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Butos & Roger Koppl, 2004. "Carabelli & de Vecchi on Keynes and Hayek," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 239-247.
    2. Cornelia Woll, 2010. "Firm Interests in Uncertain Times: Business Lobbying in Multilateral Service Liberalization," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73, Sciences Po.
    3. Walter E. Block & William Barnett, 2017. "Maturity Mismatching and “Market Failure”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 313-323, May.
    4. William Butos, 2003. "Knowledge Questions: Hayek, Keynes and Beyond," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 16(4), pages 291-307, December.
    5. Walter E. Block, 2015. "Natural Rights, Human Rights, and Libertarianism," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 29-62, January.
    6. John Davis & Theodore Koutsobinas, 2021. "Attribute substitution, counterfactual thinking, and heterodox economics," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 5(S3), pages 45-54, October.
    7. Anna Carabelli & Nicolo De Vecchi, 2001. "Hayek and Keynes: From a common critique of economic method to different theories of expectations," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 269-285.
    8. Theodore Burczak, 2001. "Profit Expectations and Confidence: Some unresolved issues in the Austrian/Post-Keynesian debate," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 59-80.
    9. Robert P. Murphy & William Barnett II & Walter E. Block, 2012. "Testing Austrian Business Cycle Theory? A Second Rejoinder To Andrew Young," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 7(3), pages 7-20, September.
    10. Miguel A. Durán, 2005. "The problems of the the Co-Ordination problem," ThE Papers 05/09, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    11. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Theoretische Grundlagen demokratischer Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik: Der Beitrag von John Maynard Keynes," Discussion Papers 2013-16, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    12. William Butos & Roger Koppl, 1993. "Hayekian expectations: Theory and empirical applications," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 303-329, September.
    13. Roger Koppl & William Butos, 2001. "Confidence in Keynes and Hayek: Reply to Burczak," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 81-86.
    14. Salvatore Rizzello & Margherita Turvani, 2000. "Institutions Meet Mind: The Way out of a Deadlock," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 165-180, June.
    15. Anna Carabelli & Nicolo De vecchi, 2004. "On Hayek and Keynes once again: a reply to Butos & Koppl," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 249-256.
    16. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m3igpqi is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Stephen Montgomery & Walter E. Block, 2016. "Animal Torture: A Critique Of Thick Libertarianism," Review of Social and Economic Issues, Romanian-American University, vol. 1(3), pages 105-116, march.
    18. Pierre Garrouste, 2008. "The Austrian roots of the economics of institutions," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 21(4), pages 251-269, December.
    19. Jon-Paul Amos & Walter E. Block, 2022. "Contra Horowitz: A Case for Reparations to Blacks for Slavery," International Studies, Libertas International University, vol. 22(2), pages 35-57, December.
    20. Roger Koppl & William Luther, 2012. "Hayek, Keynes, and modern macroeconomics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 25(3), pages 223-241, September.
    21. Cornelia Woll, 2010. "Firm Interests in Uncertain Times: Business Lobbying in Multilateral Service Liberalization," Post-Print hal-00972803, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:46-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.