IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rai/indbez/doi10.1688-indb-2016-02-fassauer.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entgrenzung und Grenzarbeit in Co-Konfiguration: Eine taetigkeitstheoretische Perspektive (Blurred boundaries and boundary work in co-configuration: An activity theoretic perspective)

Author

Listed:
  • Fassauer, Gabriele
  • Geithner, Silke

Abstract

Wir diskutieren die Herausforderungen, die sich aus einer co-konfigurierten Leistungserstellung fuer Beschaeftigte ergeben. Co-Konfiguration bedeutet, dass verschiedene Partner (z.B. Unternehmen, Kunden, Zulieferer) gemeinsam Produkte herstellen, die im Arbeitsprozess den Kundenbeduerfnissen angepasst werden. Sie stellt damit eine Form entgrenzter Leistungserstellung dar, bei der Akteure verschiedener Organisationen eingebunden sind. Dabei muessen Grenzen hinsichtlich der individuellen Arbeitsleistung der Beteiligten (z.B. Arbeitszeit, Arbeitsaufgaben) als auch in Bezug auf deren Zusammenarbeit (z.B. Verantwortlichkeiten, Arbeitsteilung) je nach Prozessverlauf neu ausgehandelt werden. Der Beitrag zielt darauf ab, diese Entgrenzung und die damit verknuepfte Grenzarbeit sowie deren Herausforderungen und Belastungspotential analytisch greifbar und empirisch sichtbar zu machen. Dazu werden taetigkeitstheoretische Ueberlegungen angewendet, entsprechende Erkenntnisse anhand eines Fallbeispiels aufgezeigt sowie Schlussfolgerungen abgeleitet. (In this paper we discuss the work-related challenges of co-configuration. Co-configuration refers to manufacturing processes where different partners (e.g. manufacturers, customers, suppliers) work together in order to produce products and services that are frequently adapted to the needs of the customer. As partners from different organizations are intensely involved in this process, co-configuration blurs the boundaries of traditional forms of production. In this vein, we argue that co-configuration poses particular challenges for employees. Thus, the boundaries of the individual working processes of employees (e.g. time, tasks) as well as their collaboration (e.g. division of labor, responsibilities) must be regularly adapted according to the stage of the production process. We argue that this is accomplished through a particular form of boundary work. In our paper we show how co-configuration blurs boundaries of the production process and describe the challenges of boundary work for employees. We also seek to elucidate how boundary work might become a work-related strain. We do so by applying cultural-historical activity theory and using empirical data from a case study of a manufacturing company.)

Suggested Citation

  • Fassauer, Gabriele & Geithner, Silke, 2016. "Entgrenzung und Grenzarbeit in Co-Konfiguration: Eine taetigkeitstheoretische Perspektive (Blurred boundaries and boundary work in co-configuration: An activity theoretic perspective)," Industrielle Beziehungen - Zeitschrift fuer Arbeit, Organisation und Management - The German Journal of Industrial Relations, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 23(2), pages 92-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:rai:indbez:doi:10.1688/indb-2016-02-fassauer
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/hampp_e-journals_IndB.htm#216
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    co-configuration; blurring of boundaries; boundary work; cultural-historical activity theory; stress;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rai:indbez:doi:10.1688/indb-2016-02-fassauer. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rainer Hampp (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.