IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/psl/moneta/202042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interdisciplinaritˆ nella teoria economica: riflessioni sulle spalle di Paolo Sylos Labini (Interdisciplinarity and economic theory: Paolo Sylos LabiniÕs legacy)

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Ambrosino

    (Universitˆ di Torino)

  • Luca Storti

    (Universitˆ di Torino)

Abstract

LÕarticolo mostra come Sylos Labini abbia contribuito a sviluppare un approccio interdisciplinare alla teoria economica. Si evidenzia che questo approccio ha diversi elementi di congiunzione con gli orientamenti eterodossi in economia, in particolare con quellÕambito della corrente istituzionalista che viene definito Original Institutional Economics e con il cosiddetto neoistituzionalismo sociologico. In particolare, Sylos Labini ha approfondito la commistione tra i diversi campi del sapere negli studi che ha dedicato alle classi sociali. Si proverˆ dunque a ricostruire come queste indagini diventino: i) il baricentro di una riflessione organica sui complessi rapporti tra politica-economia-societˆ storicamente presenti in Italia; ii) una sorta di campo tematico allÕinterno del quale Sylos Labini affina la propria concezione del lavoro scientifico dellÕeconomista e approfondisce come tra economia e istituzioni vi sia un rapporto di profonde interconnessioni. The paper deals with a specific part of Paolo Sylos Labini's scientific work promoting an interdisciplinary approach in economics. We suggest that Sylos Labini is an 'early promoter' of the contemporary heterodox orientations in economics. His contribution shares, indeed, relevant features with the Original Institutional Economics and sociological New-Institutionalism. More precisely, the paper focuses on Sylos Labini's investigations on the development of social classes in Italy. In these studies, the author developed an interdisciplinary approach mixing analytical tools belonging to both economic and sociology. We argue that this approach should be considered: i) the core of an organic reflection on the complex relationships between different level of analysis (i.e., political-economic-social ones) in the historical reconstruction of social classes in Italy; ii) a paramount example of Sylos Labini's idea of how economists should deal with scientific research.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Ambrosino & Luca Storti, 2020. "Interdisciplinaritˆ nella teoria economica: riflessioni sulle spalle di Paolo Sylos Labini (Interdisciplinarity and economic theory: Paolo Sylos LabiniÕs legacy)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 73(292), pages 285-300.
  • Handle: RePEc:psl:moneta:2020:42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/monetaecredito/article/view/17298/16523
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm Rutherford, 2001. "Institutional Economics: Then and Now," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 173-194, Summer.
    2. Davis, John B., 2006. "The turn in economics: neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Anonymous, 2014. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 1-2, May.
    4. Ambrosino, Angela & Fontana, Magda & Gigante, Anna Azzurra, 2015. "Shifting Boundaries in Economics: the Institutional Cognitive Strand," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201544, University of Turin.
    5. Anonymous, 2014. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 109-110, August.
    6. Angela Ambrosino & Magda Fontana & Anna Azzurra Gigante, 2018. "Shifting Boundaries In Economics: The Institutional Cognitive Strand And The Future Of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 767-791, July.
    7. Mario Cedrini & Magda Fontana, 2018. "Just another niche in the wall? How specialization is changing the face of mainstream economics [Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, and the sciences]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 427-451.
    8. Hodgson, Geoffrey M., 2014. "On fuzzy frontiers and fragmented foundations: some reflections on the original and new institutional economics," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 591-611, December.
    9. Alessandro Pizzorno, 1978. "Political Exchange and Collective Identity in Industrial Conflict," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Colin Crouch & Alessandro Pizzorno (ed.), The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe since 1968, chapter 11, pages 277-298, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Hodgson, Geoffrey M. & Stoelhorst, J. W., 2014. "Introduction to the special issue on the future of institutional and evolutionary economics," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 513-540, December.
    11. Marcella Corsi, 2007. "Il mestiere dell'economista secondo Paolo Sylos Labini," Economia & lavoro, Carocci editore, issue 3, pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angela Ambrosino & Magda Fontana & Anna Azzurra Gigante, 2018. "Shifting Boundaries In Economics: The Institutional Cognitive Strand And The Future Of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 767-791, July.
    2. Mario Cedrini & Magda Fontana, 2018. "Just another niche in the wall? How specialization is changing the face of mainstream economics [Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, and the sciences]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 427-451.
    3. Angela Ambrosino & Paolo Silvestri, 2020. "Hodgson: An Institution Across Disciplinary Barriers," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 54(2), pages 329-348, December.
    4. Essiane, Patrick-Nelson Daniel, 2020. "De l'Ancienne Economie Institutionnelle à la Nouvelle Economie Institutionnelle: une introduction à quelques débats [Old Institutional Economics and New Institutional Economics: an Introduction to ," MPRA Paper 102858, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Elert, Niklas & Henrekson, Magnus, 2021. "Innovative Entrepreneurship as a Collaborative Effort: An Institutional Framework," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 17(4), pages 330-435, June.
    6. Bridget O'Laughlin & Julien-François Gerber, 2016. "Forum 2016," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 47(4), pages 902-917, July.
    7. Elert, Niklas & Henrekson, Magnus, 2020. "Collaborative innovation blocs and antifragility," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 537-552, August.
    8. Olivier Brette & Nathalie Lazaric & Victor Vieira da Silva, 2017. "Habit, decision making, and rationality : comparing Veblen and early Herbert Simon," Post-Print halshs-01310305, HAL.
    9. Geoffrey M. Hodgson & Juha-Antti Lamberg, 2018. "The past and future of evolutionary economics: some reflections based on new bibliometric evidence," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 167-187, June.
    10. Verónica Robert & Gabriel Yoguel & Octavio Lerena, 2017. "The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 761-793, September.
    11. Joanna Dzionek-Kozlowska & Rafal Matera, 2016. "Institutions Without Culture. A Critique of Acemoglu and Robinson's Theory of Economic Development," Lodz Economics Working Papers 9/2016, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology.
    12. Richard R. Nelson, 2016. "Behavior and cognition of economic actors in evolutionary economics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 737-751, October.
    13. Sidney G. Winter, 2016. "The place of entrepreneurship in “The Economics that Might Have Been”," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 15-34, June.
    14. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    15. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    16. Maggie O’Neill & Ruth Penfold-Mounce & David Honeywell & Matt Coward-Gibbs & Harriet Crowder & Ivan Hill, 2021. "Creative Methodologies for a Mobile Criminology: Walking as Critical Pedagogy," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(2), pages 247-268, June.
    17. Getz, Donald & Page, Stephen J., 2016. "Progress and prospects for event tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 593-631.
    18. Schipper, Burkhard C., 2021. "Discovery and equilibrium in games with unawareness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    19. Kumar, Kaushalendra & Shukla, Ankita & Singh, Abhishek & Ram, Faujdar & Kowal, Paul, 2016. "Association between wealth and health among older adults in rural China and India," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 43-52.
    20. Urša Golob & Mark A. P. Davies & Joachim Kernstock & Shaun M. Powell, 2020. "Trending topics plus future challenges and opportunities in brand management," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 123-129, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    classi sociali; istituzioni; sviluppo economico; Paolo Sylos Labini; futuro della scienza economica; metodologia dellÕeconomia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:psl:moneta:2020:42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carlo D'Ippoliti (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economiacivile.it .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.