IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/reveco/reco_0035-2764_1985_num_36_4_408865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emplois publics et distribution des revenus

Author

Listed:
  • Claude Le Pen

Abstract

[eng] Public employment and distribution of income. Claude Le Pen. This paper investigates the influence of jniblic expenditure on distribution of income through the labour market.. The demand of labour from public administrations exercices a differentiel effect on each workers group on a labour market with segmentation, and hence contributes ta determine the income gap. It is shown that, public production being held constant, each group lias interest to act politically to bias in its favours the actual « labour-mix ». Next, « labour-mix » being fixed, workers the government has the greatest « propen.sity to employ » have interest to support programs for extension of public production.. The quantification of the lutter effect with french data, shows that its sense is anti-redistributive but its intensity is not likely to prevent others socio-economic factors from reducing the income gap. [fre] Ce texte s'intéresse à un canal de transmission peu connu des dépenses publiques vers les inégalités de revenus : le marché du travail.. La demande de travail des administrations sur un marché segmenté exerce un effet différentiel sur les différents groupes et influence donc sur la structure salariale. On montre ainsi qu'à production publique donnée, chaque groupe de travailleurs a intérêt à agir pour biaiser en sa faveur le « complexe » de travail effectivement utilisé. A complexe donné, les travailleurs qui bénéficient de la plus forte « pro­pension à employer » de la part de l'Etat ont intérêt à favoriser la production publique.. La quantification de ce dernier effet sur des données françaises montre qu'il est contre-redistributif mais que son intensité n'est toutefois pas telle qu'il puisse inverser la tendance à la fermeture de l'écart salarial dû à d'autres facteurs écono­miques et sociaux.

Suggested Citation

  • Claude Le Pen, 1985. "Emplois publics et distribution des revenus," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 36(4), pages 715-740.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1985_num_36_4_408865
    DOI: 10.3406/reco.1985.408865
    Note: DOI:10.3406/reco.1985.408865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/reco.1985.408865
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/reco_0035-2764_1985_num_36_4_408865
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/reco.1985.408865?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keller, Wouter J., 1981. "Public sector employment and the distribution of income," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 235-249, April.
    2. Gordon Tullock, 1974. "Dynamic hypothesis on bureaucracy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 127-131, September.
    3. James Buchanan & Gordon Tullock, 1977. "The expanding public sector: Wagner squared," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 147-150, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruno Frey & Werner Pommerehne, 1982. "How powerful are public bureaucrats as voters?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 253-262, January.
    2. Michael L. Marlow, 2013. "Public sector unions and government size," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 466-470, March.
    3. Halvor Mehlum & Gisle Natvik & Ragnar Torvik, 2021. "The Inefficient Combination: Competitive Markets, Free Entry, and Democracy," Working Papers No 02/2021, Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School.
    4. Ernst Jonsson, 1984. "Recurrent cost and performance comparisons within public administration: A method of generating efficiency-promoting competition," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 185-192, January.
    5. François Facchini & Mickael Melki & Andrew Pickering, 2013. "The Labor Share and the Size of Government," Discussion Papers 13/02, Department of Economics, University of York.
    6. Ferdi Celikay, 2020. "Dimensions of tax burden: a review on OECD countries," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(49), pages 27-43, March.
    7. Etienne Farvaque & Frédéric Gannon, 2018. "Profiling giants: the networks and influence of Buchanan and Tullock," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 277-302, June.
    8. Afonso, António & Furceri, Davide, 2010. "Government size, composition, volatility and economic growth," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 517-532, December.
    9. Rebecca M. Blank, 1993. "Public Sector Growth and Labor Market Flexibility: The United States vs. The United Kingdom," NBER Working Papers 4339, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. James Buchanan & Gordon Tullock, 1977. "The expanding public sector: Wagner squared," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 147-150, September.
    11. Aleksandar Vasilev, 2013. "On the cost of rent-seeking by government bureaucrats in a Real-Business-Cycle framework," Working Papers 2013_20, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    12. Stephen L. Mehay & Rodolfo A. Gonzalez, 1987. "Outside Information and the Monopoly Power of a Public Bureau: An Empirical Analysis," Public Finance Review, , vol. 15(1), pages 61-75, January.
    13. Thomas McGuire & Michael Coiner & Larry Spancake, 1979. "Budget-maximizing agencies and efficiency in government," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 333-357, September.
    14. François Facchini & Mickael Melki & Andrew Pickering, 2017. "Labour Costs and the Size of Government," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 79(2), pages 251-275, April.
    15. David Nellor, 1984. "Public bureau budgets and jurisdiction size: An empirical note," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 175-183, January.
    16. Bert Jaarsma & Arthur Schram & Frans Winden, 1986. "On the voting participation of public bureaucrats," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 183-187, January.
    17. Kristof Witte & Wim Moesen, 2010. "Sizing the government," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 39-55, October.
    18. Christopher Hood, 1991. "Stabilization and Cutbacks," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 3(1), pages 37-63, January.
    19. Rodolfo A. Gonzalez & Stephen L. Mehay, 1990. "Publicness, Scale, and Spillover Effects in Defense Spending," Public Finance Review, , vol. 18(3), pages 273-290, July.
    20. Vasilev, Aleksandar, 2013. "Essays on Real Business Cycle Modeling and the Public Sector," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 130522, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1985_num_36_4_408865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/reco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.