IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1989_num_91_5_5139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'allocation du travail dans les exploitations céréalières

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Vermersch

Abstract

[eng] Distribution of work in grain producing farms : a Tobit model of semi-fixed labour, . by Dominique Vermersch.. . Conventional models derived from duality theory assume that labour is either a fixed factor or a variable one. In this paper, we examine a more realistic model which uses the Tobit approach. Labour is assumed to be semi-fixed : it is free to vary for some observations and it is fixed for the others. The fast part is devoted to the estimation of this model using a cross-section of farms. [spa] La asignación del trabajo en las explotaciones cerealistas : una modelización Tobit de una demanda de factor semi fijo, . por Dominique Vermersch.. . Inscribiéndose en un esquema dual clásico en la teoría de la producción, la justificación teórica de una modelización Tobit permite tomar en cuenta el carácter casi fijo de ciertos factores, en la medida en que éste es efectivo para ciertas observaciones solamente. Aplicado a una muestra de explotaciones cerealistas, el modelo microeconométrico asociado contribuye a la medición de una oferta latente de trabajo y caracteriza la tecnología agrícola utilizada cuando el factor no es fijo. [fre] L'allocation du travail dans les exploitations céréalières : une modélisation Tobit d'une demande de facteur semi-fixe, . par Dominique Vermersch.. . Dans la filiation d'un schéma dual classique en théorie de la production, la justification théorique d'une modélisation Tobit permet de prendre en compte la semi-fixité de certains facteurs, dans la mesure où celle-ci est effective pour certaines observations seulement. Appliqué à un échantillon d'exploitations céréalières, le modèle microéconométrique associé contribue à mesurer une offre latente de travail et caractérise la technologie agricole utilisée en l'absence de fixité. [ger] Die Arbeitszuordnung in Getreidebaubetrieben : eine Tobit-Modellierung einer Nachfrage nach halbfixen Faktoren, . von Dominique Vermersch.. . Unter Zugrundelegung eines klassischen, dualen, produktionstheoretischen Schemas erlaubt die theoretische Rechtfertigung einer Tobit-Modellierung dem halbfixen Charakter gewisser Faktoren insoweit Rechnung zu tragen, als dieser nur für gewisse Beobachtungen tatsächlich gegeben ist. Das auf eine Auswahl von Getreidebaubetrieben angewandte mikroökonomische Modell trägt dazu bei, ein latentes Arbeitsangebot zu messen, und kennzeichnet die Landwirtschaftstechnologie bei Nichtvorliegen fixer Merkmale.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Vermersch, 1989. "L'allocation du travail dans les exploitations céréalières," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 91(5), pages 57-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1989_num_91_5_5139
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.1989.5139
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1989.5139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1989.5139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1989_num_91_5_5139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.1989.5139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diewert, W. E., 1973. "Functional forms for profit and transformation functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 284-316, June.
    2. Patrick Sevestre & Brigitte Dormont, 1986. "Modèles dynamiques de demande de travail : spécification et estimation sur données de panel," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 37(3), pages 455-488.
    3. McElroy, Marjorie B, 1987. "Additive General Error Models for Production, Cost, and Derived Demand or Share Systems," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(4), pages 737-757, August.
    4. Lau, Lawrence J., 1976. "A characterization of the normalized restricted profit function," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 131-163, February.
    5. Woodland, A. D., 1979. "Stochastic specification and the estimation of share equations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 361-383, August.
    6. John M. Antle & Ali S. Aitah, 1983. "Rice Technology, Farmer Rationality, and Agricultural Policy in Egypt," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(4), pages 667-674.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D. Vermersch & F. Bonnieux & P. Rainelli, 1993. "Abatement of agricultural pollution and economic incentives: The case of intensive livestock farming in France," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 3(3), pages 285-296, June.
    2. Pierre Rainelli, 1990. "Intensification de l'agriculture et environnement," Post-Print hal-01518566, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James R. Hines, Jr., 1990. "The Transfer Pricing Problem: Where the Profits Are," NBER Working Papers 3538, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Moschini, GianCarlo, 2001. "Production risk and the estimation of ex-ante cost functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 357-380, February.
    3. Intarapapong, Walaiporn & Peterson, E. Wesley F., 1998. "Environmentally Adjusted Measures Of Gains From Trade Liberalization: The Case Of U.S. Corn Production," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20914, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Diewert, Erwin, 2008. "Changes in the Terms of Trade and Canada's Productivity Performance," Economics working papers diewert-08-03-11-11-03-49, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 18 Jul 2008.
    5. Fry, Jane M. & Fry, Tim R. L. & McLaren, Keith R., 1996. "The stochastic specification of demand share equations: Restricting budget shares to the unit simplex," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 377-385, August.
    6. Huffman, Wallace & Evenson, Robert E., 1987. "Research Bias Effects for Input and Output Decisions: An Application to U.S. Cash Grain Farms," Staff General Research Papers Archive 11016, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. John Mullahy & Stephanie Robert, 2010. "No time to lose: time constraints and physical activity in the production of health," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 409-432, December.
    8. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "Performance Analysis: Economic Foundations & Trends," CEPA Working Papers Series WP162021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    9. E. Grifell-Tatjé & C. A. K. Lovell, 1999. "Profits and Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(9), pages 1177-1193, September.
    10. Aradhyula, Satheesh Venkata, 1989. "Policy structure, output supply and input demand for US crops," ISU General Staff Papers 198901010800009909, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Brown, Bryan W. & Walker, Mary Beth, 1995. "Stochastic specification in random production models of cost-minimizing firms," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1-2), pages 175-205.
    12. Emmanuel Dhyne & Amil Petrin & Valerie Smeets & Frederic Warzynski, 2017. "Multi Product Firms, Import Competition, and the Evolution of Firm-product Technical Efficiencies," NBER Working Papers 23637, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. John Mullahy, 2010. "Multivariate Fractional Regression Estimation of Econometric Share Models," NBER Working Papers 16354, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. HUR, Jung & YOON, Haeyeon, 2018. "Product Dynamics and Trade Liberalization: Evidence from the Korea-US FTA," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-82, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    15. Hathie, Ibrahima & Lopez, Rigoberto A., 2002. "Optimal Transboundary Water Diversion: The Case Of The Senegal River," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19586, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Diewert, Erwin & Mizobuchi, Hideyuki, 2009. "An Economic Approach to the Measurement of Productivity Growth Using Differences Instead of Ratios," Economics working papers erwin_diewert-2009-2, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 09 Jan 2009.
    17. Sahoo, Biresh K. & Tone, Kaoru, 2009. "Radial and non-radial decompositions of profit change: With an application to Indian banking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1130-1146, August.
    18. Manyeki, John Kibara & Kotosz, Balázs & Kanó, Izabella Szakálné, 2021. "Unconditional factor demands and supply response for livestock products: A farm-level analysis of the Southern Rangelands of Kenya," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(3), September.
    19. Fullerton, Thomas M., Jr., 1984. "Supply elasticities for U.S. fresh market vegetables: an application of duality theory within a quasi-rational expectations framework," ISU General Staff Papers 1984010108000017526, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    20. Muhammad Ali Chaudhary & Eatzaz Ahmad & Abid A. Burki & Mushtaq A. Khan, 1999. "Industrial Sector Input Demand Responsiveness and Policy Interventions," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 1083-1100.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1989_num_91_5_5139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.