IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/caecpo/cep_0154-8344_1998_num_32_1_1229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les principes d'un système monétaire sain de Bentham

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Sigot

Abstract

[eng] La théorie monétaire de Bentham, telle qu'elle apparaît dans le manuscrit Sur les prix (1801) met l'accent sur la notion de confiance, élément clef dans la détermination de la valeur du papier-monnaie. Il en résulte une analyse qui s'intéresse de manière prioritaire à la nécessité d'éviter à la fois les banqueroutes et l'inflation : l'article reconstruit alors la position de Bentham pour mettre en place un système monétaire sain, c'est-à-dire un système tel que le volume de monnaie soit proportionné aux besoins de la circulation, aux réserves des banques et à la quantité de monnaie métallique qui circule. [fre] La théorie monétaire de Bentham, telle qu'elle apparaît dans le manuscrit Sur les prix (1801) met l'accent sur la notion de confiance, élément clef dans la détermination de la valeur du papier-monnaie. Il en résulte une analyse qui s'intéresse de manière prioritaire à la nécessité d'éviter à la fois les banqueroutes et l'inflation : l'article reconstruit alors la position de Bentham pour mettre en place un système monétaire sain, c'est-à-dire un système tel que le volume de monnaie soit proportionné aux besoins de la circulation, aux réserves des banques et à la quantité de monnaie métallique qui circule.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Sigot, 1998. "Les principes d'un système monétaire sain de Bentham," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 32(1), pages 117-140.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_1998_num_32_1_1229
    DOI: 10.3406/cep.1998.1229
    Note: DOI:10.3406/cep.1998.1229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/cep.1998.1229
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/cep_0154-8344_1998_num_32_1_1229
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/cep.1998.1229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathalie Sigot, 1993. "« Be quiet », mais modérément : le rôle de l'État dans la pensée économique de Jeremy Bentham," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(1), pages 23-50.
    2. Michel Rosier, 1994. "Être ou ne pas être smithien en 1804 : le cas Lord Peter King," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 45(5), pages 1227-1250.
    3. Marco E.L. Guidi, 2009. "Jeremy Bentham," Chapters, in: Jan Peil & Irene van Staveren (ed.), Handbook of Economics and Ethics, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Brebner, J. Bartlett, 1948. "Laissez Faire and State Intervention in Nineteenth-Century Britain," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(S1), pages 59-73, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michel Bellet, 2011. "Saint-Simonism and Utilitarianism : the history of a paradox. Bentham’s Defence of Usury under Saint-Amand Bazard’s Interpretation," Working Papers 1135, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    2. Michel Bellet, 2011. "Saint-Simonism and Utilitarianism: the history of a paradox. Bentham's Defence of Usury under Saint-Amand Bazard's Interpretation," Working Papers halshs-00654847, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Baujard, 2006. "From moral welfarism to technical non-welfarism : A step back to Bentham’s felicific calculus of its members," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) 200606, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS.
    2. Nathalie Sigot, 2005. "Compte rendu de Jeremy Bentham, Rights, representation and reform. Nonsense upon stilts and other writings on the French Revolution (ed. par Ph. Schofield, C. Pease-Watkin et C. Blamires), Oxford : Cl," Post-Print hal-00637258, HAL.
    3. Antoinette Baujard, 2010. "Collective interest vs. individual interest in Bentham's Felicific Calculus. Questioning welfarism and fairness," Post-Print halshs-00528587, HAL.
    4. Michel Rosier, 1996. "Adam Smith et la Pennsylvanie : la main invisible et les ailes dédaliennes du papier monnaie," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 27(1), pages 89-111.
    5. Nathalie Sigot, 1993. "« Be quiet », mais modérément : le rôle de l'État dans la pensée économique de Jeremy Bentham," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(1), pages 23-50.
    6. Michel Bellet, 2011. "Saint-Simonism and Utilitarianism: the history of a paradox. Bentham's Defence of Usury under Saint-Amand Bazard's Interpretation," Working Papers halshs-00654847, HAL.
    7. Nathalie Sigot & Laurie Bréban, 2020. "The influence of laws on informal rules: a reassement of the controversy between Jeremy Bentham and Adam Smith on usury [L’influence des lois sur les règles informelles : une relecture de la contro," Post-Print hal-03825528, HAL.
    8. Domènec Melé, 2016. "Re-thinking Capitalism: What We can Learn from Scholasticism?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 293-304, January.
    9. Marco Dardi, 2010. "Marshall on welfare, or: the 'utilitarian' meets the 'evolver'," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 405-437.
    10. Michel Bellet, 2011. "Saint-Simonism and Utilitarianism : the history of a paradox. Bentham’s Defence of Usury under Saint-Amand Bazard’s Interpretation," Working Papers 1135, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    11. Andr Lapidus & Nathalie Sigot, 2000. "Individual utility in a context of asymmetric sensitivity to pleasure and pain: an interpretation of Bentham's felicific calculus," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 45-78.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_1998_num_32_1_1229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/cep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.