IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/caecpo/cep_0154-8344_1997_num_29_1_1206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Histoire de l'analyse économique et économie politique. À propos des Cahiers d'économie politique

Author

Listed:
  • Marcello Messori

Abstract

[eng] This paper aims to show the evolution in the research project pursued in the first twenty issues of the Cahiers d'économie politique (CEP). First, I stress that the coherence of this project is due to the organization in the research work and to the consequent definition of the research topics. This singles out four stages in CEP's evolution. The first three stages lead to a new conception of the history of economic analysis which becomes the fundamental tool to allow a heterodox theorizing. This new conception leaves, however, open questions. The fourth stage analyzes these open questions but does not solve them by means of a combination between the critical approach in the history of economic analysis and a number of recent results . reached in the orthodox economic theory. [ita] Lo scopo di questo lavoro è di esaminare Pevoluzione del progetto di ricerca perseguito dai Cahiers d'économie politique (CEP). Si sottolinea, dapprima, che la coerenza di tale progetto dipende dallo stile di lavoro e dalla conseguente definizione dell'oggetto di ricerca. Cio permette di indi- viduare quattro tappe nll'evoluzione dei CEP. Le prime tre tappe portano a una nuova concezione della storia dell'analisi economica che diventa lo strumento fondamentale per « fare » teoria economica eterodossa. Questa concezione présenta, perô, punti deboli. La quarta tappa affronta tali punti ma non è in grado di risolverli mediante un confronto fra l'approccio critico nella storia dell'analisi economica e alcuni recenti risultati raggiunti dalla teoria economica ortodossa. [fre] Lo scopo di questo lavoro è di esaminare Pevoluzione del progetto di ricerca perseguito dai Cahiers d'économie politique (CEP). Si sottolinea, dapprima, che la coerenza di tale progetto dipende dallo stile di lavoro e dalla conseguente definizione dell'oggetto di ricerca. Ciô permette di indi- viduare quattro tappe nll'evoluzione dei CEP. Le prime tre tappe portano a una nuova concezione della storia dell'analisi economica che diventa lo strumento fondamentale per « fare » teoria economica eterodossa. Questa concezione présenta, perô, punti deboli. La quarta tappa affronta tali punti ma non è in grado di risolverli mediante un confronto fra l'approccio critico nella storia dell'analisi economica e alcuni recenti risultati raggiunti dalla teoria economica ortodossa.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcello Messori, 1997. "Histoire de l'analyse économique et économie politique. À propos des Cahiers d'économie politique," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 29(1), pages 7-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_1997_num_29_1_1206
    DOI: 10.3406/cep.1997.1206
    Note: DOI:10.3406/cep.1997.1206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/cep.1997.1206
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/cep_0154-8344_1997_num_29_1_1206
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/cep.1997.1206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro & Wright, Randall, 1989. "On Money as a Medium of Exchange," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(4), pages 927-954, August.
    2. Marcello Messori, 1987. "L'offre et la demande de crédit chez Schumpeter," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 13(1), pages 131-152.
    3. Jean Cartelier & Bernard Morucci, 1974. "Quelques remarques sur la différenciation des taux de profit," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 1(1), pages 163-165.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berentsen, Aleksander & Huber, Samuel & Marchesiani, Alessandro, 2016. "The societal benefit of a financial transaction tax," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 303-323.
    2. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:5:y:2008:i:7:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kevin D. Hoover, 2016. "The Crisis in Economic Theory: A Review Essay," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1350-1361, December.
    4. Menzio, Guido & Shi, Shouyong & Sun, Hongfei, 2013. "A monetary theory with non-degenerate distributions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(6), pages 2266-2312.
    5. Radwanski, Juliusz, 2020. "On the Purchasing Power of Money in an Exchange Economy," MPRA Paper 104244, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Maryam Farboodi & Gregor Jarosch & Guido Menzio, 2016. "Intermediation as Rent Extraction," PIER Working Paper Archive 16-026, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 01 Dec 2016.
    7. White, Reilly & Marinakis, Yorgos & Islam, Nazrul & Walsh, Steven, 2020. "Is Bitcoin a currency, a technology-based product, or something else?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Emilio Depetris-Chauvin & Ömer Özak, 2020. "The origins of the division of labor in pre-industrial times," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 297-340, September.
    9. Guillaume Rocheteau & Pierre‐Olivier Weill, 2011. "Liquidity in Frictional Asset Markets," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(s2), pages 261-282, October.
    10. Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro & Lagos, Ricardo & Wright, Randall, 2016. "Introduction to the symposium issue on money and liquidity," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-9.
    11. Berentsen, Aleksander & McBride, Michael & Rocheteau, Guillaume, 2017. "Limelight on dark markets: Theory and experimental evidence on liquidity and information," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 70-90.
    12. Maurizio Iacopetta, 2014. "Dynamics of assets liquidity and inequality in economies with decentralized markets," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/2029nqlehl8, Sciences Po.
    13. E. Samanidou & E. Zschischang & D. Stauffer & T. Lux, 2001. "Microscopic Models of Financial Markets," Papers cond-mat/0110354, arXiv.org.
    14. Matthias Doepke & Martin Schneider, 2017. "Money as a Unit of Account," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 1537-1574, September.
    15. Ennis, H.M.Huberto M., 2004. "Macroeconomic fluctuations and bargaining," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 322-340, April.
    16. Luis Angeles, 2020. "Four Phases in the History of Money," Working Papers 2020_24, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    17. Berentsen, Aleksander & Monnet, Cyril, 2008. "Monetary policy in a channel system," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 1067-1080, September.
    18. Ricardo de O. Cavalcanti & Andres Erosa & Ted Temzelides, 1999. "Private Money and Reserve Management in a Random-Matching Model," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 107(5), pages 929-945, October.
    19. Munetomo Ando & Daisuke Oyama, 2002. "A model of a spatial economy with trading posts," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 18(1), pages 1-11.
    20. Arun G. Chandrasekhar & Robert Townsend & Juan Pablo Xandri, 2018. "Financial Centrality and Liquidity Provision," NBER Working Papers 24406, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Chao Gu & Cyril Monnet & Ed Nosal & Randall Wright, 2019. "On the Instability of Banking and Other Financial Intermediation," Working Papers 19.04, Swiss National Bank, Study Center Gerzensee.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_1997_num_29_1_1206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/cep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.