IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2014y2014i1id371p1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Používání experimentu jako vědecké metody ve vědě ekonomické

Author

Listed:
  • Pavla Chmelová

Abstract

The paper discusses the experiments and their explicit and covert use in economics. Due to the nature of the scientific method is its suitability for inclusion in the methodological apparatus of science often questionable, in the case of the economy even more because it is a very complex science having as object of research the individuals and the economic system as a whole. After a confrontation of selected economic schools in terms of their attitudes toward testing hypotheses (the emphasis is placed on the comparison of praxeology and methodological positivism) is critically assessed the actual level of economic experimentation. On the grounds of the defined relationship between economics and political science is in the paper identified an extensive examination of the conclusions of economic theory in practice and discussed dimension of this finding.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavla Chmelová, 2014. "Používání experimentu jako vědecké metody ve vědě ekonomické," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 1-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2014:y:2014:i:1:id:371:p:1-13
    DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.371.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.371.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.e-logos.371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy N. Cason & Vai-Lam Mui, 2003. "Testing Political Economy Models of Reform in the Laboratory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(2), pages 208-212, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Urs Fischbacher & Simeon Schudy, 2014. "Reciprocity and resistance to comprehensive reform," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 411-428, September.
    2. Haas, Nicholas & Hassan, Mazen & Mansour, Sarah & Morton, Rebecca B., 2021. "Polarizing information and support for reform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 883-901.
    3. Danila Serra, 2012. "Combining Top-Down and Bottom-Up Accountability: Evidence from a Bribery Experiment," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 569-587, August.
    4. Paetzel, Fabian & Sausgruber, Rupert & Traub, Stefan, 2014. "Social preferences and voting on reform: An experimental study," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 36-55.
    5. repec:unu:wpaper:wp2012-55 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ulrike Müller, 2012. "Pro-poor Service Delivery and Social Identity," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-055, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Cason, Timothy N. & Mui, Vai-Lam, 2005. "Uncertainty and resistance to reform in laboratory participation games," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 708-737, September.
    8. Müller, Ulrike, 2012. "Pro-poor Service Delivery and Social Identity," WIDER Working Paper Series 055, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2014:y:2014:i:1:id:371:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.