IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0059734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lifetime Costs and Outcomes of Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot Compared to Natural Progression of the Disease: Great Ormond Street Hospital Cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Rachael Maree Hunter
  • Mark Isaac
  • Alessandra Frigiola
  • David Blundell
  • Kate Brown
  • Kate Bull

Abstract

Background: Tetralogy of Fallot is a congenital heart disease that requires surgical repair without which survival through childhood is extremely rare. The aim of this paper is to use data from the mandatory follow-up of patients with Tetralogy of Fallot to model the health-related costs and outcomes over the first 55-years of life. Method: A decision analytical model was developed to establish costs and outcomes for patients up to 55 years after diagnosis and first repair of Tetralogy of Fallot compared to natural progression. Data from Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) centres that follow up Tetralogy of Fallot patients and Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), London, United Kingdom (UK) medical records was used to establish the cost and effectiveness of current interventions. Data from a Czech cohort was used for the natural, no intervention condition. Results: The average cost per patient of a repair for Tetralogy of Fallot was £26,938 (SE = £4,140). The full life time cost per patient, with no discount rate, was £65,310 (95% CI £64,981–£65,729); £56,559 discounted (95% CI £56,159–£56,960). Patients with a repair had an average of 35 Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) per patient over 55 years undiscounted and 20.16 QALYs discounted. If the disorder was left to take its natural course, patients on average had a total of 3 QALYs per patient with no discount rate and 2.30 QALYs discounted. Conclusion: A model has been developed that provides an estimate of the value for money of an expensive repair of a congenital heart disease. The model could be used to test the cost-effectiveness of making amendments to the care pathway.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachael Maree Hunter & Mark Isaac & Alessandra Frigiola & David Blundell & Kate Brown & Kate Bull, 2013. "Lifetime Costs and Outcomes of Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot Compared to Natural Progression of the Disease: Great Ormond Street Hospital Cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-7, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0059734
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059734&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0059734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine Stevens, 2012. "Valuation of the Child Health Utility 9D Index," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 729-747, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ratcliffe, Julie & Huynh, Elisabeth & Chen, Gang & Stevens, Katherine & Swait, Joffre & Brazier, John & Sawyer, Michael & Roberts, Rachel & Flynn, Terry, 2016. "Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 48-59.
    2. Russell Jago & Byron Tibbitts & Emily Sanderson & Emma L. Bird & Alice Porter & Chris Metcalfe & Jane E. Powell & Darren Gillett & Simon J. Sebire, 2019. "Action 3:30R: Results of a Cluster Randomised Feasibility Study of a Revised Teaching Assistant-Led Extracurricular Physical Activity Intervention for 8 to 10 Year Olds," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Ruvini M. Hettiarachchi & Peter Arrow & Sameera Senanayake & Hannah Carter & David Brain & Richard Norman & Utsana Tonmukayawul & Lisa Jamieson & Sanjeewa Kularatna, 2023. "Developing an Australian utility value set for the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale-4D (ECOHIS-4D) using a discrete choice experiment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(8), pages 1285-1296, November.
    4. Jennifer Hafekost & Sarah Johnson & David Lawrence & Michael Sawyer & John Ainley & Cathrine Mihalopoulos & Stephen R. Zubrick, 2016. "Introducing ‘Young Minds Matter’," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 49(4), pages 503-514, December.
    5. Eve Wittenberg, 2012. "Valuing Children’s Health," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 633-635, August.
    6. Julio Gallego-Méndez & Jorge Perez-Gomez & José Ignacio Calzada-Rodríguez & Ángel Manuel Denche-Zamorano & María Mendoza-Muñoz & Jorge Carlos-Vivas & Miguel Ángel Garcia-Gordillo & Jose C. Adsuar, 2020. "Relationship between Health-Related Quality of Life and Physical Activity in Children with Hyperactivity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Ruslan Jabrayilov & Antoinette D I van Asselt & Karin M Vermeulen & Sheri Volger & Patrick Detzel & Livia Dainelli & Paul F M Krabbe & for the Pediatrics expert group, 2018. "A descriptive system for the Infant health-related Quality of life Instrument (IQI): Measuring health with a mobile app," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Benjamin M. Craig & Wolfgang Greiner & Derek S. Brown & Bryce B. Reeve, 2016. "Valuation of Child Health‐Related Quality of Life in the United States," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 768-777, June.
    9. Julie Ratcliffe & Elisabeth Huynh & Katherine Stevens & John Brazier & Michael Sawyer & Terry Flynn, 2016. "Nothing About Us Without Us? A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Health‐State Values for the Child Health Utility‐9D Using Profile Case Best–Worst Scaling," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 486-496, April.
    10. Alastair Canaway & Emma Frew & Emma Lancashire & Miranda Pallan & Karla Hemming & Peymane Adab & on behalf of the WAVES trial investigators, 2019. "Economic evaluation of a childhood obesity prevention programme for children: Results from the WAVES cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in schools," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0059734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.