IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motion prediction enables simulated MR-imaging of freely moving model organisms

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Reischl
  • Mazin Jouda
  • Neil MacKinnon
  • Erwin Fuhrer
  • Natalia Bakhtina
  • Andreas Bartschat
  • Ralf Mikut
  • Jan G Korvink

Abstract

Magnetic resonance tomography typically applies the Fourier transform to k-space signals repeatedly acquired from a frequency encoded spatial region of interest, therefore requiring a stationary object during scanning. Any movement of the object results in phase errors in the recorded signal, leading to deformed images, phantoms, and artifacts, since the encoded information does not originate from the intended region of the object. However, if the type and magnitude of movement is known instantaneously, the scanner or the reconstruction algorithm could be adjusted to compensate for the movement, directly allowing high quality imaging with non-stationary objects. This would be an enormous boon to studies that tie cell metabolomics to spontaneous organism behaviour, eliminating the stress otherwise necessitated by restraining measures such as anesthesia or clamping. In the present theoretical study, we use a phantom of the animal model C. elegans to examine the feasibility to automatically predict its movement and position, and to evaluate the impact of movement prediction, within a sufficiently long time horizon, on image reconstruction. For this purpose, we use automated image processing to annotate body parts in freely moving C. elegans, and predict their path of movement. We further introduce an MRI simulation platform based on bright field videos of the moving worm, combined with a stack of high resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM) slice images as virtual high resolution phantoms. A phantom provides an indication of the spatial distribution of signal-generating nuclei on a particular imaging slice. We show that adjustment of the scanning to the predicted movements strongly reduces distortions in the resulting image, opening the door for implementation in a high-resolution NMR scanner.Author summary: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) requires its subjects not to move, since movement will cause image artifacts. This is hard to achieve for adult humans, whom we can ask to comply, but can currently only be achieved by sedation for other freely moving biological specimens. Because of the importance of non-invasive MRI as a technique to also capture metabolic information during activity, this is a huge deficiency of the methodology that is hampering progress. In our paper we ask the question whether it is possible to computationally combine optical information on specimen movement with MRI. Our approach is to predict the future movement and position of the specimen and thereby anticipate where it will be so as to specify correct MRI parameters. Our computer simulations show, for a freely moving worm, that a reasonable prediction is already possible for a short time window, and that we can control the amount of error of the resulting MRI image. Importantly, with the continuous speedup of computation, our simulations suggest that it is opportune now to implement such a system in hardware.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Reischl & Mazin Jouda & Neil MacKinnon & Erwin Fuhrer & Natalia Bakhtina & Andreas Bartschat & Ralf Mikut & Jan G Korvink, 2019. "Motion prediction enables simulated MR-imaging of freely moving model organisms," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006997
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006997
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006997&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greg J Stephens & Bethany Johnson-Kerner & William Bialek & William S Ryu, 2008. "Dimensionality and Dynamics in the Behavior of C. elegans," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elke Braun & Bart Geurten & Martin Egelhaaf, 2010. "Identifying Prototypical Components in Behaviour Using Clustering Algorithms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Stanislav Nagy & Marc Goessling & Yali Amit & David Biron, 2015. "A Generative Statistical Algorithm for Automatic Detection of Complex Postures," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Christophe Restif & Carolina Ibáñez-Ventoso & Mehul M Vora & Suzhen Guo & Dimitris Metaxas & Monica Driscoll, 2014. "CeleST: Computer Vision Software for Quantitative Analysis of C. elegans Swim Behavior Reveals Novel Features of Locomotion," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Chang Woo Ji & Young-Seuk Park & Yongde Cui & Hongzhu Wang & Ihn-Sil Kwak & Tae-Soo Chon, 2020. "Analyzing the Response Behavior of Lumbriculus variegatus (Oligochaeta: Lumbriculidae) to Different Concentrations of Copper Sulfate Based on Line Body Shape Detection and a Recurrent Self-Organizing ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Sepideh Bazazi & Frederic Bartumeus & Joseph J Hale & Iain D Couzin, 2012. "Intermittent Motion in Desert Locusts: Behavioural Complexity in Simple Environments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    6. Steffen Werner & Jochen C Rink & Ingmar H Riedel-Kruse & Benjamin M Friedrich, 2014. "Shape Mode Analysis Exposes Movement Patterns in Biology: Flagella and Flatworms as Case Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Jeffrey P Nguyen & Ashley N Linder & George S Plummer & Joshua W Shaevitz & Andrew M Leifer, 2017. "Automatically tracking neurons in a moving and deforming brain," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Laetitia Hebert & Tosif Ahamed & Antonio C Costa & Liam O’Shaughnessy & Greg J Stephens, 2021. "WormPose: Image synthesis and convolutional networks for pose estimation in C. elegans," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Li-Chun Lin & Han-Sheng Chuang, 2017. "Analyzing the locomotory gaitprint of Caenorhabditis elegans on the basis of empirical mode decomposition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.