IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manifold Based Optimization for Single-Cell 3D Genome Reconstruction

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Paulsen
  • Odin Gramstad
  • Philippe Collas

Abstract

The three-dimensional (3D) structure of the genome is important for orchestration of gene expression and cell differentiation. While mapping genomes in 3D has for a long time been elusive, recent adaptations of high-throughput sequencing to chromosome conformation capture (3C) techniques, allows for genome-wide structural characterization for the first time. However, reconstruction of "consensus" 3D genomes from 3C-based data is a challenging problem, since the data are aggregated over millions of cells. Recent single-cell adaptations to the 3C-technique, however, allow for non-aggregated structural assessment of genome structure, but data suffer from sparse and noisy interaction sampling. We present a manifold based optimization (MBO) approach for the reconstruction of 3D genome structure from chromosomal contact data. We show that MBO is able to reconstruct 3D structures based on the chromosomal contacts, imposing fewer structural violations than comparable methods. Additionally, MBO is suitable for efficient high-throughput reconstruction of large systems, such as entire genomes, allowing for comparative studies of genomic structure across cell-lines and different species.Author Summary: Understanding how the genome is folded in three-dimensional (3D) space is crucial for unravelling the complex regulatory mechanisms underlying the differentiation and proliferation of cells. With recent high-throughput adaptations of chromosome conformation capture in techniques such as single-cell Hi-C, it is now possible to probe 3D information of chromosomes genome-wide. Such experiments, however, only provide sparse information about contacts between regions in the genome. We have developed a tool, based on manifold based optimization (MBO), that reconstructs 3D structures from such contact information. We show that MBO allows for reconstruction of 3D genomes more consistent with the original contact map, and with fewer structural violations compared to other, related methods. Since MBO is also computationally fast, it can be used for high-throughput and large-scale 3D reconstruction of entire genomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas Paulsen & Odin Gramstad & Philippe Collas, 2015. "Manifold Based Optimization for Single-Cell 3D Genome Reconstruction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004396
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004396
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004396&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Lisha & Buja, Andreas, 2009. "Local Multidimensional Scaling for Nonlinear Dimension Reduction, Graph Drawing, and Proximity Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(485), pages 209-219.
    2. Daniel Russel & Keren Lasker & Ben Webb & Javier Velázquez-Muriel & Elina Tjioe & Dina Schneidman-Duhovny & Bret Peterson & Andrej Sali, 2012. "Putting the Pieces Together: Integrative Modeling Platform Software for Structure Determination of Macromolecular Assemblies," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5, January.
    3. Zhijun Duan & Mirela Andronescu & Kevin Schutz & Sean McIlwain & Yoo Jung Kim & Choli Lee & Jay Shendure & Stanley Fields & C. Anthony Blau & William S. Noble, 2010. "A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7296), pages 363-367, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simeon Carstens & Michael Nilges & Michael Habeck, 2016. "Inferential Structure Determination of Chromosomes from Single-Cell Hi-C Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-33, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simeon Carstens & Michael Nilges & Michael Habeck, 2016. "Inferential Structure Determination of Chromosomes from Single-Cell Hi-C Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-33, December.
    2. Alon Diament & Tamir Tuller, 2015. "Improving 3D Genome Reconstructions Using Orthologous and Functional Constraints," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Jessen V. Bredeson & Austin B. Mudd & Sofia Medina-Ruiz & Therese Mitros & Owen Kabnick Smith & Kelly E. Miller & Jessica B. Lyons & Sanjit S. Batra & Joseph Park & Kodiak C. Berkoff & Christopher Plo, 2024. "Conserved chromatin and repetitive patterns reveal slow genome evolution in frogs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Fan Cheng & Rob J Hyndman & Anastasios Panagiotelis, 2021. "Manifold Learning with Approximate Nearest Neighbors," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 3/21, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    5. Seungsoo Hahn & Dongsup Kim, 2015. "Identifying and Reducing Systematic Errors in Chromosome Conformation Capture Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Zhang Qi & Xu Zheng & Lai Yutong, 2021. "An Empirical Bayes approach for the identification of long-range chromosomal interaction from Hi-C data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Patrick Bryant & Gabriele Pozzati & Wensi Zhu & Aditi Shenoy & Petras Kundrotas & Arne Elofsson, 2022. "Predicting the structure of large protein complexes using AlphaFold and Monte Carlo tree search," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Zhaohui Qin & Ben Li & Karen N. Conneely & Hao Wu & Ming Hu & Deepak Ayyala & Yongseok Park & Victor X. Jin & Fangyuan Zhang & Han Zhang & Li Li & Shili Lin, 2016. "Statistical Challenges in Analyzing Methylation and Long-Range Chromosomal Interaction Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 8(2), pages 284-309, October.
    9. Yana Valasatava & Anthony R Bradley & Alexander S Rose & Jose M Duarte & Andreas Prlić & Peter W Rose, 2017. "Towards an efficient compression of 3D coordinates of macromolecular structures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Harold A. Hernández-Roig & M. Carmen Aguilera-Morillo & Rosa E. Lillo, 2021. "Functional Modeling of High-Dimensional Data: A Manifold Learning Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Luwan Zhang & Grace Wahba & Ming Yuan, 2016. "Distance shrinkage and Euclidean embedding via regularized kernel estimation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(4), pages 849-867, September.
    12. Zhen Wah Tan & Enrico Guarnera & Igor N Berezovsky, 2018. "Exploring chromatin hierarchical organization via Markov State Modelling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-35, December.
    13. Avrin Ghanaeian & Sumita Majhi & Caitlyn L. McCafferty & Babak Nami & Corbin S. Black & Shun Kai Yang & Thibault Legal & Ophelia Papoulas & Martyna Janowska & Melissa Valente-Paterno & Edward M. Marco, 2023. "Integrated modeling of the Nexin-dynein regulatory complex reveals its regulatory mechanism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Guang Shi & D. Thirumalai, 2023. "A maximum-entropy model to predict 3D structural ensembles of chromatin from pairwise distances with applications to interphase chromosomes and structural variants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Hao Wang & Jiaxin Yang & Yu Zhang & Jianliang Qian & Jianrong Wang, 2022. "Reconstruct high-resolution 3D genome structures for diverse cell-types using FLAMINGO," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Manyu Du & Fan Zou & Yi Li & Yujie Yan & Lu Bai, 2022. "Chemically Induced Chromosomal Interaction (CICI) method to study chromosome dynamics and its biological roles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Hyelim Jo & Taemook Kim & Yujin Chun & Inkyung Jung & Daeyoup Lee, 2021. "A compendium of chromatin contact maps reflecting regulation by chromatin remodelers in budding yeast," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Silva, F.N. & Rodrigues, F.A. & Oliveira, O.N. & da F. Costa, L., 2013. "Quantifying the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals and fields," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 469-477.
    19. Benjamin Walker & Dane Taylor & Josh Lawrimore & Caitlin Hult & David Adalsteinsson & Kerry Bloom & M Gregory Forest, 2019. "Transient crosslinking kinetics optimize gene cluster interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, August.
    20. Surya K Ghosh & Daniel Jost, 2018. "How epigenome drives chromatin folding and dynamics, insights from efficient coarse-grained models of chromosomes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.