IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ierequ/v16y2021i2p413-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How innovativeness of family-owned SMEs differ depending on their characteristics?

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Civelek

    (University of Entrepreneurship and Law, Czech Republic)

  • Aleksandr Kljucnikov

    (University of Entrepreneurship and Law, Czech Republic)

  • Vendula Fialova

    (University of Entrepreneurship and Law, Czech Republic)

  • Andrea Folvarcna

    (University of Entrepreneurship and Law, Czech Republic)

  • Milan Stoch

    (University of Entrepreneurship and Law, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Research background: SMEs encounter more survival impediments than larger businesses. Innovativeness is a crucial attribute for smaller firms to overcome these barriers since it positively influences their performance, competitiveness, and capability to operate in the long term. However, depending on firm characteristics, the innovativeness of SMEs might differ. Purpose of the article: This research investigates whether the innovativeness of family-owned SMEs differs depending on their size, sector, area of activity, and succession on the sample of 350 family-owned SMEs that operate in Czechia. Methods: The data collected in the Czech Republic in 2020 through the structured self-administered questionnaire were analyzed using Skewness-Kurtosis and Levene's normality tests and Independent Sample T-test to find the differences in SMEs innovativeness depending on their selected characteristics. Findings & value added: According to the results, SMEs' innovativeness differs depending on their size, industry, and area activity. On the other hand, the analyses confirmed the nonexistence of the differences in SMEs' innovative-ness concerning succession involvement. The region of SMEs' operation, the scope of their activities, and firms' executives' age might be crucial arguments to explain the differences and similarities in these enterprises' innovativeness. Even though the research focuses only on the SMEs located in Czechia, the similarity of the issues all SMEs face when competing with the larger firms worldwide, especially if we take into consideration the countries with a similar level of development and overall institutional business conditions, allows for generalizing our results and might draw readers' attention to this paper. Policymakers, universities, international institutions, and financial institutions might cooperate to create industrial zones, encourage research centers, and provide education and financial support to stimulate SMEs' innovative activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Civelek & Aleksandr Kljucnikov & Vendula Fialova & Andrea Folvarcna & Milan Stoch, 2021. "How innovativeness of family-owned SMEs differ depending on their characteristics?," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(2), pages 413-428, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pes:ierequ:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:413-428
    DOI: 10.24136/eq.2021.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/eq.2021.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandr Kljucnikov & Mehmet Civelek & Vendula Fialova & Andrea Folvarcna, 2021. "Organizational, local, and global innovativeness of family-owned SMEs depending on firm-individual level characteristics: evidence from the Czech Republic," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(1), pages 169-184, March.
    2. Izabela Kowalik & Lidia Danik & Petr Král & Hana Řezanková, 2017. "Antecedents of Accelerated Internationalisation of Polish and Czech Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(3), pages 31-48.
    3. David Audretsch & Maksim Belitski & Sameeksha Desai, 2015. "Entrepreneurship and economic development in cities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(1), pages 33-60, October.
    4. Matthias Filser & Alfredo de Massis & Johanna Gast & Sascha Kraus & Thomas Niemand, 2018. "Tracing the Roots of Innovativeness in Family SMEs," Post-Print hal-02057212, HAL.
    5. Mehmet Civelek & Krzysztof Gajdka & Jaroslav Svetlik & Vladimir Vavrecka, 2020. "Differences in the usage of online marketing and social media tools: evidence from Czech, Slovakian and Hungarian SMEs," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 15(3), pages 537-563, September.
    6. Robert Nowacki & Marcin W. Staniewski, 2012. "Innovation in the Management of SMEs in the Service Sector in Poland," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(Special N), pages 755-773, November.
    7. Webb, Justin W. & Ketchen Jr., David J. & Ireland, R. Duane, 2010. "Strategic entrepreneurship within family-controlled firms: Opportunities and challenges," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 67-77, June.
    8. J.P. Coen Rigtering & Sascha Kraus & Fabian Eggers & Søren H. Jensen, 2014. "A comparative analysis of the entrepreneurial orientation/growth relationship in service firms and manufacturing firms," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 275-294, February.
    9. Grundström, Christina & Öberg, Christina & Öhrwall Rönnbäck, Anna, 2012. "Family-owned manufacturing SMEs and innovativeness: A comparison between within-family successions and external takeovers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 162-173.
    10. Kenneth Chukwujioke Agbim, 2020. "Government policy, financial inclusion and performance of SMEs in South Eastern Nigeria," International Entrepreneurship Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 6(2), pages 69-82.
    11. GuoXiang Tang & Kwangtae Park & Anurag Agarwal & Feng Liu, 2020. "Impact of Innovation Culture, Organization Size and Technological Capability on the Performance of SMEs: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Piątkowski, Marcin J., 2020. "Implementation of innovations in enterprises using the EU funds: A comparative analysis," MPRA Paper 101883, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Josip Kotlar & Alfredo De Massis & Hanqing Fang & Federico Frattini, 2014. "Strategic reference points in family firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 597-619, October.
    14. Polona Tominc, 2019. "Perceived Innovativeness and Competitiveness of Early-Stage Entrepreneurs," Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb, vol. 21(1), pages 87-108, June.
    15. Laforet, Sylvie, 2013. "Organizational innovation outcomes in SMEs: Effects of age, size, and sector," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 490-502.
    16. Robert Dankiewicz & Anna Ostrowska-Dankiewicz & Cagri Bulut, 2020. "The attitudes of entrepreneurs of the small and medium-sized enterprises sector in Poland to key business risks," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 15(3), pages 511-536, September.
    17. Zuzana Virglerova & Francesca Conte & John Amoah & Maria Rita Massaro, 2020. "The Perception Of Legal Risk And Its Impact On The Business Of Smes," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Heidi Wiig Aslesen & Gouya Harirchi, 2015. "The effect of local and global linkages on the innovativeness in ICT SMEs: does location-specific context matter?," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9-10), pages 644-669, October.
    19. Aleksandr Kljucnikov & Mehmet Civelek & Petr Cech & Jitka Kloudova, 2019. "Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs’ executives in the comparative perspective for Czechia and Turkey," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(4), pages 773-795, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Kolková & Aleksandr Kljuènikov, 2021. "Demand forecasting: an alternative approach based on technical indicator Pbands," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 1063-1094, December.
    2. Gul Shah Sabary & Aleksandr Kljuènikov, 2023. "Barriers to immigrant entrepreneurship: A causal relationship analysis of the Asian immigrant entrepreneurs in Germany employing the DEMATEL approach," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 18(2), pages 491-522, June.
    3. Michal Karas & Mária Režòáková, 2023. "A novel approach to estimating the debt capacity of European SMEs," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 18(2), pages 551-581, June.
    4. Civelek Mehmet & Polách Jiří & Švihlíková Ilona & Paták Milan, 2022. "International Differences in the Perceptions of Export Obstacles By SMEs in the Same Firm-Level Characteristics: Evidence from European Countries," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 18-45, June.
    5. Krzysztof Wach & Agnieszka Glodowska, 2021. "How do demographics and basic traits of an entrepreneur impact the internationalization of firms?," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 399-424, June.
    6. Beata Gavurova & Sylvia Jencova & Radovan Bacik & Marta Miskufova & Stanislav Letkovsky, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in predicting the bankruptcy of non-financial corporations," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1215-1251, December.
    7. Aleksandr Kljuènikov & Mehmet Civelek & Cyril Klimeš & Radim Farana, 2022. "Export risk perceptions of SMEs in selected Visegrad countries," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(1), pages 173-190, March.
    8. Aleksandr Kljuènikov & Mehmet Civelek & Vladimír Krajèík & Petr Novák & Michal Èervinka, 2022. "Financial performance and bankruptcy concerns of SMEs in their export decision," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 867-890, September.
    9. Škare, Marinko & Blanco-Gonzalez-Tejero, Cristina & Crecente, Fernando & del Val, Maria Teresa, 2022. "Scientometric analysis on entrepreneurial skills - creativity, communication, leadership: How strong is the association?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehmet Civelek & Vladimír Krajèík, 2022. "How do SMEs from different countries perceive export impediments depending on their firm-level characteristics? System approach," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(1), pages 55-78, March.
    2. Beata Gavurova & Sylvia Jencova & Radovan Bacik & Marta Miskufova & Stanislav Letkovsky, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in predicting the bankruptcy of non-financial corporations," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1215-1251, December.
    3. Fernando Muñoz-Bullón & Maria J. Sanchez-Bueno & Alfredo De Massis, 2020. "Combining Internal and External R&D: The Effects on Innovation Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(5), pages 996-1031, September.
    4. Migliori, Stefania & De Massis, Alfredo & Maturo, Fabrizio & Paolone, Francesco, 2020. "How does family management affect innovation investment propensity? The key role of innovation impulses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 243-256.
    5. Zuzana Virglerova & Eva Ivanova & Jan Dvorsky & Jaroslav Belas & Tomáš Krulický, 2021. "Selected factors of internationalisation and their impact on the SME perception of the market risk," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 1011-1032, December.
    6. Civelek Mehmet & Polách Jiří & Švihlíková Ilona & Paták Milan, 2022. "International Differences in the Perceptions of Export Obstacles By SMEs in the Same Firm-Level Characteristics: Evidence from European Countries," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 18-45, June.
    7. Jan Dvorsky & Ludmila Kozubikova & Aleksandr Kljucnikov & Eva Ivanova, 2022. "Owners vs. Managers. Disparities of Attitudes on the Business Risk in SME Segment," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 174-174.
    8. Vanessa Weimann & Maike Gerken & Marcel Hülsbeck, 2021. "Old flames never die – the role of binding social ties for corporate entrepreneurship in family firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1707-1730, December.
    9. Tommaso Minola & Nadine Kammerlander & Franz W. Kellermanns & Frank Hoy, 2021. "Corporate Entrepreneurship and Family Business: Learning Across Domains," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Aleksandr Kljuènikov & Mehmet Civelek & Vladimír Krajèík & Petr Novák & Michal Èervinka, 2022. "Financial performance and bankruptcy concerns of SMEs in their export decision," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 867-890, September.
    11. Julio Diéguez-Soto & María J. Martínez-Romero, 2019. "Family Involvement in Management and Product Innovation: The Mediating Role of R&D Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Rondi, Emanuela & De Massis, Alfredo & Kraus, Sascha, 2021. "Servitization through open service innovation in family firms: Exploring the ability-willingness paradox," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 436-444.
    13. Alessandro Cirillo & Luca Pennacchio & Maria Rosaria Carillo & Mauro Romano, 2021. "The antecedents of entrepreneurial risk-taking in private family firms: CEO seasons and contingency factors," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1571-1590, April.
    14. Andersson, Ulf & Dasí, Àngels & Mudambi, Ram & Pedersen, Torben, 2016. "Technology, innovation and knowledge: The importance of ideas and international connectivity," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 153-162.
    15. Jean–Luc Arregle & Bat Batjargal & Michael A. Hitt & Justin W. Webb & Toyah Miller & Anne S. Tsui, 2015. "Family Ties in Entrepreneurs’ Social Networks and New Venture Growth," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(2), pages 313-344, March.
    16. Tommaso Pucci & Mara Brumana & Tommaso Minola & Lorenzo Zanni, 2020. "Social capital and innovation in a life science cluster: the role of proximity and family involvement," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 205-227, February.
    17. Chua, Jess H. & Chrisman, James J. & De Massis, Alfredo & Wang, Hao, 2018. "Reflections on family firm goals and the assessment of performance," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 107-113.
    18. Raquel Ortega-Argilés, 2022. "The evolution of regional entrepreneurship policies: “no one size fits all”," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(3), pages 585-610, December.
    19. Jonas Hammerschmidt & Fabian Eggers & Sascha Kraus & Paul Jones & Matthias Filser, 2020. "Entrepreneurial orientation in sports entrepreneurship - a mixed methods analysis of professional soccer clubs in the German-speaking countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 839-857, September.
    20. D’Angelo, Alfredo & Presutti, Manuela, 2019. "SMEs international growth: The moderating role of experience on entrepreneurial and learning orientations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 613-624.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation; SMEs; succession; family-owned businesses; manufacturing-service sectors;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ierequ:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:413-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.