IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pcz/journl/v9y2014i1p43-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aspects Of The Gender Inequality Issue In Knowledge Society Careers

Author

Listed:
  • Sabina Irimie

    (University of Petroºani, Mining Faculty, Romania,)

  • Roland Iosif Moraru

    (University of Petroºani, Mining Faculty, Romania,)

  • Lucian-Ionel Cioca

    („Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Romania)

  • Maria – Elena Boatca

    (University of Petroºani, Mining Faculty, Romania)

Abstract

Professional segregation, as a form of gender inequality persists in the labor market. The main issue with this phenomenon is gender inequality payment, with drawbacks in both individual and social evolution. Women’s potential as professionals is not used at its highest level and, thus, the economic and social development is not in the right pace. Also, the additional income generated by equal payment would offer benefits for the society, as well as for its members, through the reduction of poverty rate. As gender bias seems to be the main cause of professional segregation and unequal payment, this paper aims to study the causes and the existent situation at a global level. The comparison between European countries and the US best reflects the differences and causes of gender inequality issues in both education and labor market. Also, the paper sheds light upon unemployment as an indicator of gender equality in the workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabina Irimie & Roland Iosif Moraru & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Maria – Elena Boatca, 2014. "Aspects Of The Gender Inequality Issue In Knowledge Society Careers," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 9(1), pages 43-53, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:1:p:43-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pjms.zim.pcz.pl/files/Aspects-of-The-Gender-Inequality-Issue-in-Knowledge-Society-Careers.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.pjms.zim.pcz.pl/aspects-of-the-gender-inequality-issue-in-knowledge-society-careers.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabina IRIMIE & Virginia BALEANU & Maria Elena BOATCÃ, 2013. "The Gender Issue In Romania Between Aspirations And Reality," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 114-124, November.
    2. Jeremy Greenwood & Nezih Guner & Georgi Kocharkov & Cezar Santos, 2014. "Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 348-353, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jerzy Kazmierczyk & Daria Figas & Maria Akulich & Ireneusz Jazwinski, 2021. "Mobbing in Banks: The Role of Gender and Position on the Process of Mobbing in Banks in Poland and Russia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 697-714.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Greenwood, Jeremy & Guner, Nezih & Santos, Cezar & Kocharakov, Georgi, 2015. "Technology and the Changing Family: A Unified Model of Marriage, Divorce, Educational Attainment and Married Female Labor-Force," CEPR Discussion Papers 10434, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Alena Bicakova & Stepan Jurajda, 2014. "The Quiet Revolution and the Family: Gender Composition of Tertiary Education and Early Fertility Patterns," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp504, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    3. Ray Boshara & William R. Emmons & Bryan J. Noeth, 2015. "The Demographics of Wealth - How Age, Education and Race Separate Thrivers from Strugglers in Today's Economy. Essay No. 2: The Role of Education," Demographics of Wealth, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue 2, pages 1-28.
    4. Jeremy Greenwood & Nezih Guner & Karen A. Kopecky, 2019. "The Wife's Protector: A Quantitative Theory Linking Contraceptive Technology with the Decline in Marriage," Working Papers wp2019_1912, CEMFI.
    5. Alan G. Isaac, 2021. "Wealth Inequality and the Financial Accumulation Process," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 430-448, June.
    6. Ugo Bolletta & Luca Paolo Merlino, 2022. "Marriage Through Friends," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1046-1066, December.
    7. Boxho, Claire & Donald, Aletheia & Goldstein, Markus & Montalvao, Joao & Rouanet, Léa, 2020. "Assortative matching in Africa: Evidence from rural Mozambique, Côte d’Ivoire, and Malawi," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Marcel Fischer & Natalia Khorunzhina, 2019. "Housing Decision With Divorce Risk," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 60(3), pages 1263-1290, August.
    9. Jeremy Greenwood & Nezih Guner & Georgi Kocharkov & Cezar Santos, 2016. "Technology and the Changing Family: A Unified Model of Marriage, Divorce, Educational Attainment, and Married Female Labor-Force Participation," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 1-41, January.
    10. Macchioni Giaquinto, Annarita & Jones, Andrew M. & Rice, Nigel & Zantomio, Francesca, 2021. "Labour supply and informal care responses to health shocks within couples: evidence from the UKHLS," GLO Discussion Paper Series 806, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Pierre‐André Chiappori & Monica Costa‐Dias & Sam Crossman & Costas Meghir, 2020. "Changes in Assortative Matching and Inequality in Income: Evidence for the UK," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 39-63, March.
    12. Khachaturyan, Marianna & Peterson, E. Wesley F., 2016. "Economic Inequality and Changing Family Structure," Cornhusker Economics 306977, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    13. Peter Mihalyi & Iván Szelenyi, 2016. "Two different sources of inequalities: profits and rents in advanced market economies," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1630, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    14. Buchinsky, Moshe & Gotlibovski, Chemi & Lifshitz, Osnat, 2023. "Residential location and the male-female gap in labor market outcomes—a lesson from newcomers to israel," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Pestel, Nico, 2017. "Searching on Campus? Marriage Market Effects of the Student Gender Composition," IZA Discussion Papers 11175, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Nie, Haifeng & Xing, Chunbing, 2019. "Education expansion, assortative marriage, and income inequality in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 37-51.
    17. Hanzhe Zhang, 2021. "An Investment-and-Marriage Model with Differential Fecundity: On the College Gender Gap," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(5), pages 1464-1486.
    18. Espinosa, Hector & Guzman, Ivan, 2018. "Mercado Matrimonial Dominicano: Impacto del Nivel de Educación en el Proceso de Selección de Parejas y su Vinculación con el Mercado Laboral [Marriage Market in the Dominican Republic: Impact of Ed," MPRA Paper 92112, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Nicolas Frémeaux & Arnaud Lefranc, 2020. "Assortative Mating and Earnings Inequality in France," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(4), pages 757-783, December.
    20. Matthew Gnagey & Therese Grijalva & Rong Rong, 2020. "Spousal influence and assortative mating on time preferences: a field experiment in the USA," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 461-512, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:1:p:43-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paula Bajdor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzpczpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.