IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v9y2000i1p69-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some recent developments in the evaluation of university research outcomes in the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Garrett-Jones
  • David Aylward

Abstract

Three specific recent developments in the evaluation of UK university research — the Research Assessment Exercise, the common performance indicators for the research councils, and the ‘evaluation portfolio’ of the Economic and Social Research Council — are described, and how they work in practice is examined. As in other countries, we find some tension between the criteria of excellence and socioeconomic benefit in valuing research outcomes. Driven by government policy, the primacy of peer evaluation based on publications is being strongly augmented by methods and performance measures that attempt to capture the broader benefits and impacts of academic research within the context of agency and national planning. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Garrett-Jones & David Aylward, 2000. "Some recent developments in the evaluation of university research outcomes in the United Kingdom," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 69-75, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:1:p:69-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154400781777430
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Walter, Alexander I. & Helgenberger, Sebastian & Wiek, Arnim & Scholz, Roland W., 2007. "Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: Design and application of an evaluation method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 325-338, November.
    2. Shefali SRIVASTAVA & Nilofer HUSSAINI, 2023. "Managing Quality In Higher Education System: Insights From The Literature," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 63-79, March.
    3. Chiang Kao & Hwei-Lan Pao, 2009. "An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 261-277, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:1:p:69-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.