IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v32y2023i2p188-199..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • James M Bowen
  • Mathieu Ouimet
  • Justin Lawarée
  • Joanna Bielecki
  • Ashley Rhéaume
  • Caylee Greenberg
  • Valeria E

Abstract

Diabetes Action Canada Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Network in Chronic Disease was formed in 2016 and is funded primarily through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We propose a novel mixed-methods approach to a network evaluation integrating the State of Network Evaluation framework and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS) preferred framework and indicators. We measure key network themes of connectivity, health and results, and impact and return on investment associated with health research networks. Our methods consist of a longitudinal cross-sectional network survey of members and social network analysis to examine Network Connectivity and assess the frequency of interactions, the topics discussed during them, and how networking effectively facilitates interactions and collaboration among members. Network Health will be evaluated through semistructured interviews, a membership survey inquiring about satisfaction and experience with the Network, and a review of documentary sources related to funding and infrastructure to evaluate Network Sustainability. Finally, we will examine Network Results and Impact using the CAHS preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research across the five domains of the CAHS framework, which include: advancing knowledge, capacity building, informing decision making, health impact, and economic and social impact. Indicators will be assessed with various methods, including bibliometric analyses, review of relevant documentary sources (annual reports), member activities informing health and research policy, and Patient Partner involvement. The Network Evaluation will provide members and stakeholders with information for planning, improvements, and funding future Network endeavors.

Suggested Citation

  • James M Bowen & Mathieu Ouimet & Justin Lawarée & Joanna Bielecki & Ashley Rhéaume & Caylee Greenberg & Valeria E, 2023. "Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 188-199.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2023:i:2:p:188-199.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvac034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Wixted & J. Adam Holbrook, 2012. "Environmental complexity and stakeholder theory in formal research network evaluations," Prometheus, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 291-314, September.
    2. Paula Adam & Maite Solans-Domènech & Joan M. V. Pons & Marta Aymerich & Silvina Berra & Imma Guillamon & Emilia Sánchez & Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda, 2012. "Assessment of the impact of a clinical and health services research call in Catalonia," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 319-328, October.
    3. David A Griffith & Michael Y Hu & John K Ryans, 2000. "Process Standardization across Intra- and Inter-Cultural Relationships," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 31(2), pages 303-324, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zubcevic, Nives & Luxton, Sandra, 2011. "A comparison of print advertisements from Australia and Croatia," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 131-136.
    2. Dinur, Adva & Hamilton III, Robert D. & Inkpen, Andrew C., 2009. "Critical context and international intrafirm best-practice transfers," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 432-446, December.
    3. Sharma, Kavita & Licsandru, Tana Cristina & Gupta, Suraksha & Aggarwal, Swati & Kanungo, Rama, 2020. "An investigation into corporate trust and its linkages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 806-824.
    4. Grzegorczyk, Malgorzata, 2019. "The role of culture-moderated social capital in technology transfer – insights from Asia and America," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 132-141.
    5. Cristina López-Duarte & Marta M. Vidal-Suárez & Belén González-Díaz & Nuno Rosa Reis, 2016. "Understanding the relevance of national culture in international business research: a quantitative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1553-1590, September.
    6. Brauer, Rene & Dymitrow, Mirek & Tribe, John, 2019. "The impact of tourism research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 64-78.
    7. García-Romero, Antonio & Escribano, Álvaro & Tribó, Josep A., 2017. "The impact of health research on length of stay in Spanish public hospitals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 591-604.
    8. Griffith, David A. & Yalcinkaya, Goksel & Calantone, Roger J., 2010. "Do marketing capabilities consistently mediate effects of firm intangible capital on performance across institutional environments?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 217-227, July.
    9. Apoorva Ghosh, 2013. "Interpersonal Cross-Cultural Contact," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 38(1-2), pages 81-101, February.
    10. Luis Filipe Lages & Cristiana Raquel Lages, 2003. "The MIXADAPT scale: a measure of marketing mix adaptation to the foreign market," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp429, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    11. Kustin, Richard Alan, 2004. "Marketing mix standardization: a cross cultural study of four countries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 637-649, October.
    12. Ogonowski, Andrzej & Montandon, Andrew & Botha, Elsamari & Reyneke, Mignon, 2014. "Should new online stores invest in social presence elements? The effect of social presence on initial trust formation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 482-491.
    13. Matteo Pedrini & Valentina Langella & Mario Alberto Battaglia & Paola Zaratin, 2018. "Assessing the health research’s social impact: a systematic review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(3), pages 1227-1250, March.
    14. Chung, Henry F.L. & Rose, Ellen & Huang, Pei-how, 2012. "Linking international adaptation strategy, immigrant effect, and performance: The case of home–host and cross-market scenario," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 40-58.
    15. Linwan Wu, 2017. "Relationship building in nation branding: The central role of nation brand commitment," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 65-80, February.
    16. Parthajit Doley & Mithun J. Sharma, 2020. "Network Centrality Measure as an Indicator for Standardized Advertising Strategy in Economically Similar Countries," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(6), pages 1406-1426, December.
    17. Fariborz Damanpour & Carlos Devece & Chao Chen & Vijay Pothukuchi, 2012. "Organizational culture and partner interaction in the management of international joint ventures in India," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 453-478, June.
    18. Hannah S. Lee & David A. Griffith, 2012. "Comparative insights into the governance problems of agency theory: the influence of institutional environment on the basic human tenets," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 2(1), pages 19-33, March.
    19. Marzieh Zendehdel & Laily Hj Paim & Narges Delafrooz, 2016. "The moderating effect of culture on the construct factor of perceived risk towards online shopping behaviour," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1223390-122, December.
    20. Lee, Sang-Gun & Trimi, Silvana & Kim, Changsoo, 2013. "The impact of cultural differences on technology adoption," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 20-29.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2023:i:2:p:188-199.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.