IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v34y2021i7p3456-3496..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thousands of Alpha Tests
[The performance of hedge funds: Risk, return, and incentives]

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Giglio
  • Yuan Liao
  • Dacheng Xiu
  • Wei Jiang

Abstract

Data snooping is a major concern in empirical asset pricing. We develop a new framework to rigorously perform multiple hypothesis testing in linear asset pricing models, while limiting the occurrence of false positive results typically associated with data snooping. By exploiting a variety of machine learning techniques, our multiple-testing procedure is robust to omitted factors and missing data. We also prove its asymptotic validity when the number of tests is large relative to the sample size, as in many finance applications. To improve the finite sample performance, we also provide a wild-bootstrap procedure for inference and prove its validity in this setting. Finally, we illustrate the empirical relevance in the context of hedge fund performance evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Giglio & Yuan Liao & Dacheng Xiu & Wei Jiang, 2021. "Thousands of Alpha Tests [The performance of hedge funds: Risk, return, and incentives]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(7), pages 3456-3496.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:34:y:2021:i:7:p:3456-3496.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhaa111
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaume Coqueret, 2023. "Forking paths in financial economics," Papers 2401.08606, arXiv.org.
    2. Constantinos Kardaras & Hyeng Keun Koo & Johannes Ruf, 2022. "Estimation of growth in fund models," Papers 2208.02573, arXiv.org.
    3. Huang, Haitao & Jiang, Lei & Leng, Xuan & Peng, Liang, 2023. "Bootstrap analysis of mutual fund performance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 239-255.
    4. Lee, Hsiu-Chuan & Lee, Yun-Huan & Nguyen, Cuong, 2023. "Tail comovements of implied volatility indices and global index futures returns predictability," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    5. Li, Ang & Liu, Mark & Sheather, Simon, 2023. "Predicting stock splits using ensemble machine learning and SMOTE oversampling," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Guanhao Feng & Stefano Giglio & Dacheng Xiu, 2020. "Taming the Factor Zoo: A Test of New Factors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(3), pages 1327-1370, June.
    7. Andrew Y. Chen, 2022. "Most claimed statistical findings in cross-sectional return predictability are likely true," Papers 2206.15365, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    8. Smith, Simon C., 2022. "Time-variation, multiple testing, and the factor zoo," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Andrew Y. Chen, 2022. "Do t-Statistic Hurdles Need to be Raised?," Papers 2204.10275, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    10. Ai He & Guofu Zhou, 2023. "Diagnostics for asset pricing models," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(4), pages 617-642, December.
    11. Hollstein, Fabian, 2022. "The world of anomalies: Smaller than we think?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Campbell R. Harvey & Yan Liu, 2020. "False (and Missed) Discoveries in Financial Economics," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(5), pages 2503-2553, October.
    13. Pätäri, Eero & Ahmed, Sheraz & Luukka, Pasi & Yeomans, Julian Scott, 2023. "Can monthly-return rank order reveal a hidden dimension of momentum? The post-cost evidence from the U.S. stock markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Colak, Gonul & Fu, Mengchuan & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2022. "On modeling IPO failure risk," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Nabil Bouamara & S'ebastien Laurent & Shuping Shi, 2023. "Sequential Cauchy Combination Test for Multiple Testing Problems with Financial Applications," Papers 2303.13406, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    16. Niels Joachim Gormsen & Eben Lazarus, 2023. "Duration‐Driven Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(3), pages 1393-1447, June.
    17. Ge, Shuyi & Li, Shaoran & Linton, Oliver, 2023. "News-implied linkages and local dependency in the equity market," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 779-815.
    18. Campbell R. Harvey & Yan Liu, 2020. "False (and Missed) Discoveries in Financial Economics," Papers 2006.04269, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:34:y:2021:i:7:p:3456-3496.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.