IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v2y1999i2p195-223..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Hedging: The Relevance of Contract Specifications and Banking Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Ian A. Cooper
  • Antonio S. Mello

Abstract

This article examines the contribution of hedging to firm value and the cost of hedging in a unified framework. Optimal hedging and firm value are explicitly linked to firm risk, the type of debt covenants and the relative priority of the hedging contract. It is shown that in some cases hedging is possible only if the counterparty to the forward contract also holds a significant portion of the debt. Also, the spread in the hedging contract reduces the optimal amount of hedging to less than the minimum-variance hedge ratio. Among other results this article elucidates why some firms hedge using forward contracts while other firms hedge in the futures markets, as well as why higher priority forward contracts are more efficient hedging vehicles. JEL Classification numbers: G13, G22 and G33.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian A. Cooper & Antonio S. Mello, 1999. "Corporate Hedging: The Relevance of Contract Specifications and Banking Relationships," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 2(2), pages 195-223.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:2:y:1999:i:2:p:195-223.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1009790704572
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hahnenstein, Lutz & Roder, Klaus, 2003. "The minimum variance hedge and the bankruptcy risk of the firm," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 315-326.
    2. Lookman, Aziz A., 2009. "Bank borrowing and corporate risk management," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 632-649, October.
    3. Lutz Hahnenstein & Klaus Röder, 2003. "The minimum variance hedge and the bankruptcy risk of the firm," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 315-326.
    4. Lutz Hahnenstein & Gerrit Köchling & Peter N. Posch, 2021. "Do firms hedge in order to avoid financial distress costs? New empirical evidence using bank data," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 718-741, March.
    5. Marcello Spanò, 2013. "Theoretical explanations of corporate hedging," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(7), pages 84-102, July.
    6. Marcello Spanò, 2013. "Theoretical explanations of corporate hedging," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 3(7), pages 84-102, July.
    7. Tim Brailsford & Richard Heaney & Barry Oliver, 2005. "Use of derivatives in public sector organizations," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 45(1), pages 43-66, March.
    8. Lutz Hahnenstein & Klaus Röder, 2007. "Who hedges more when leverage is endogenous? A testable theory of corporate risk management under general distributional conditions," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 353-391, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:2:y:1999:i:2:p:195-223.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.